Suppr超能文献

多部位去污方案可降低机械通气的COVID-19患者的获得性感染发生率。

Multiple-site decontamination regimen decreases acquired infection incidence in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

作者信息

Massart Nicolas, Reizine Florian, Fillatre Pierre, Seguin Philippe, La Combe Béatrice, Frerou Aurélien, Egreteau Pierre-Yves, Hourmant Baptiste, Kergoat Pierre, Lorber Julien, Souchard Jerome, Canet Emmanuel, Rieul Guillaume, Fedun Yannick, Delbove Agathe, Camus Christophe

机构信息

Service de Réanimation, CH de St BRIEUC, 10, rue Marcel Proust, 22000, Saint-Brieuc, France.

Service de Réanimation Médicale CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri le Guilloux, 35000 , Rennes, France.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01057-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among strategies that aimed to prevent acquired infections (AIs), selective decontamination regimens have been poorly studied in the COVID-19 setting. We assessed the impact of a multiple-site decontamination (MSD) regimen on the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in COVID-19 patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We performed an ancillary analysis of a multicenter retrospective observational study in 15 ICUs in western France. In addition to standard-care (SC), 3 ICUs used MSD, a variant of selective digestive decontamination, which consists of the administration of topical antibiotics four times daily in the oropharynx and the gastric tube, chlorhexidine body wash and a 5-day nasal mupirocin course. AIs were compared between the 3 ICUs using MSD (MSD group) and the 12 ICUs using SC.

RESULTS

During study period, 614 of 1158 COVID-19 patients admitted in our ICU were intubated for at least 48 h. Due to missing data in 153 patients, 461 patients were finally included of whom 89 received MSD. There were 34 AIs in the MSD group (2117 patient-days), as compared with 274 AIs in the SC group (8957 patient-days) (p < 0.001). MSD was independently associated with a lower risk of AI (IRR = 0.56 [0.38-0.83]; p = 0.004) (Table 2). When the same model was used for each site of infection, MSD remained independently associated with a lower risk of VAP (IRR = 0.52 [0.33-0.89]; p = 0.005) but not of BSI (IRR = 0.58, [0.25-1.34], p = 0.21). Hospital mortality was lower in the MSD group (16.9% vs 30.1%, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In ventilated COVID-19 patients, MSD was independently associated with lower AI incidence.

摘要

背景

在旨在预防获得性感染(AI)的策略中,选择性净化方案在新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)环境中的研究较少。我们评估了多部位净化(MSD)方案对接受机械通气的COVID-19患者血流感染(BSI)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率的影响。

方法

我们对法国西部15个重症监护病房(ICU)的一项多中心回顾性观察研究进行了辅助分析。除了标准护理(SC)外,3个ICU使用了MSD,这是一种选择性消化道净化的变体,包括每天4次在口咽和胃管局部应用抗生素、洗必泰全身洗浴以及为期5天的鼻内莫匹罗星疗程。比较了使用MSD的3个ICU(MSD组)和使用SC的12个ICU之间的AI情况。

结果

在研究期间,我们ICU收治的1158例COVID-19患者中有614例接受了至少48小时的插管。由于153例患者数据缺失,最终纳入461例患者,其中89例接受了MSD。MSD组有34例AI(2117患者日),而SC组有274例AI(8957患者日)(p<0.001)。MSD与较低的AI风险独立相关(发病率比值比[IRR]=0.56[0.38-0.83];p=0.004)(表2)。当对每个感染部位使用相同模型时,MSD仍与较低的VAP风险独立相关(IRR=0.52[0.33-0.89];p=0.005),但与BSI风险无关(IRR=0.58,[0.25-1.34],p=0.21)。MSD组的医院死亡率较低(16.9%对30.1%,p=0.017)。

结论

在接受机械通气的COVID-19患者中,MSD与较低的AI发生率独立相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/9440172/569fe601056f/13613_2022_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验