• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2021 年美国预防服务工作组筛查指南更新后,按种族分析肺癌筛查资格。

Analysis of Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening by Race After 2021 Changes to US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Guidelines.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York.

Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29741.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29741
PMID:36053535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9440399/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Lung cancer incidence and mortality have disproportionate consequences for racial and ethnic minority populations. The extent to which the 2021 changes to the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines have reduced the racial disparity gap in lung cancer screening eligibility is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the consequences of the changes in USPSTF low-dose computed tomography eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening between 2013 and 2021 among Black and White community-dwelling adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed data from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study, a prospective longitudinal cohort study of community-dwelling Black and White adults 45 years and older who were initially recruited across the US between January 2003 and October 2007, with ongoing follow-up. All participants who would have been potentially eligible for lung cancer screening based on the 2021 USPSTF guidelines (N = 14 285) were included. Follow-up data for the current cohort study were collected and analyzed between January 2013 and December 2017, with final analysis performed in 2021.

EXPOSURES

Self-reported Black vs White race.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Differences in the proportion of Black vs White participants eligible for lung cancer screening according to 2013 and 2021 guidelines were assessed using modified Poisson models with robust SEs. Associations between important covariates (demographic characteristics and social factors associated with health), including interaction and dissimilarity indices (2 measures of residential segregation), and differences in screening eligibility were also examined.

RESULTS

Among 14 285 participants (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [7.5] years; 7675 men [53.7%]), 5787 (40.5%) self-identified as Black and 8498 (59.5%) as White. Based on the 2013 USPSTF guidelines, 1109 of 5787 Black participants (19.2%) and 2313 of 8498 White participants (27.2%) were eligible for lung cancer screening (difference, -8.06 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.44 to -6.67 percentage points). Based on the 2021 guidelines, 1667 of 5787 Black participants (28.8%) and 2940 of 8498 White participants (34.6%) were eligible for screening (difference, -5.73 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.28 to -4.19 percentage points). After adjustment for differences in individual characteristics and residential segregation, the 2013 difference in screening eligibility among Black vs White participants was -12.66 percentage points (95% CI, -14.71 to -10.61 percentage points), and the 2021 difference was -12.15 percentage points (95% CI, -14.37 to -9.93 percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, 2021 changes to the USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines were associated with reductions in but not elimination of existing eligibility disparities in lung cancer screening among Black and White adults. These findings suggest that accounting for factors beyond age and pack-years of smoking is needed when tailoring guidelines to improve screening eligibility among groups at high risk of lung cancer.

摘要

重要性

肺癌的发病率和死亡率对少数族裔和族裔群体造成了不成比例的后果。尚不清楚美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)筛查指南 2021 年的变化在多大程度上减少了肺癌筛查资格方面的种族差异。

目的

评估 2013 年至 2021 年间 USPSTF 低剂量计算机断层扫描(CT)肺癌筛查资格标准变化对黑人和白人社区居住成年人的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究分析了 Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke 研究的数据,这是一项针对社区居住的 45 岁及以上黑人和白人成年人的前瞻性纵向队列研究,最初在美国各地招募,招募时间为 2003 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月,随访时间持续进行。所有符合 2021 年 USPSTF 指南潜在肺癌筛查资格的参与者(N=14285)均被纳入本研究。本队列研究的随访数据于 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月间收集和分析,最终分析于 2021 年进行。

暴露情况

自我报告的黑人和白人种族。

主要结果和测量

采用改良泊松模型和稳健标准误评估了 2013 年和 2021 年指南中黑人和白人参与者的肺癌筛查资格比例差异。还检查了重要协变量(与健康相关的人口统计学特征和社会因素)之间的关联,包括交互和差异指数(2 种居住隔离测量),以及筛查资格差异。

结果

在 14285 名参与者中(平均[标准差]年龄为 64.7[7.5]岁;男性 7675 人[53.7%]),5787 人(40.5%)自我认定为黑人,8498 人(59.5%)为白人。根据 2013 年 USPSTF 指南,5787 名黑人参与者中有 1109 名(19.2%)和 8498 名白人参与者中有 2313 名(27.2%)符合肺癌筛查资格(差异,-8.06 个百分点;95%CI,-9.44 至-6.67 个百分点)。根据 2021 年指南,5787 名黑人参与者中有 1667 名(28.8%)和 8498 名白人参与者中有 2940 名(34.6%)符合筛查资格(差异,-5.73 个百分点;95%CI,-7.28 至-4.19 个百分点)。在调整了个体特征和居住隔离的差异后,黑人参与者与白人参与者之间 2013 年筛查资格的差异为-12.66 个百分点(95%CI,-14.71 至-10.61 个百分点),2021 年的差异为-12.15 个百分点(95%CI,-14.37 至-9.93 个百分点)。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,USPSTF 肺癌筛查指南的 2021 年修订与黑人和白人成年人肺癌筛查资格方面现有差异的缩小有关,但并没有消除这些差异。这些发现表明,在为高风险肺癌群体定制指南以提高筛查资格时,需要考虑年龄和吸烟包年数以外的因素。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening by Race After 2021 Changes to US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Guidelines.2021 年美国预防服务工作组筛查指南更新后,按种族分析肺癌筛查资格。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29741.
2
Evaluation of Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Guideline Among Women and Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations.修订版美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南在女性和少数族裔人群中的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033769. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33769.
3
Risk Model-Based Lung Cancer Screening and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the US.基于风险模型的肺癌筛查与美国的种族和民族差异
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Dec 1;9(12):1640-1648. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4447.
4
Evaluation of Population-Level Changes Associated With the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations in Community-Based Health Care Systems.评估与 2021 年美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查建议相关的基于社区的医疗保健系统中的人群水平变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128176. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28176.
5
Persistent race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility.肺癌筛查资格方面持续存在的基于种族和性别的差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):248-260.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Among African American Adult Smokers.对非裔美国成年吸烟者中美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南的评估
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;5(9):1318-1324. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1402.
7
Does the revised LDCT lung cancer screening guideline bridge the racial disparities gap: Results from the health and retirement study.修订后的低剂量CT肺癌筛查指南是否缩小了种族差异差距:来自健康与退休研究的结果
J Natl Med Assoc. 2024 Apr;116(2 Pt 1):180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
8
Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility.2021 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查标准与其他肺癌筛查标准在资格方面的种族差异比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;8(3):374-382. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6720.
9
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.肺癌低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的获益与危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077.
10
Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.肺癌筛查的使用情况以及不同种族和族裔的不同资格标准的影响:2019 年行为风险因素监测系统数据。
Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1812-1819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34098. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-clinician discussions on lung cancer screening in the United States before and after 2021 guidelines.2021年指南前后美国患者与临床医生关于肺癌筛查的讨论。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf039.
2
Fatalism and Interest in Cancer Screening Among African American Individuals.非裔美国人中的宿命论与癌症筛查意愿
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526612. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26612.
3
Novel Platforms of Education to Engage Black and African Americans in Lung Cancer Screening.让黑人和非裔美国人参与肺癌筛查的新型教育平台。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility.2021 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查标准与其他肺癌筛查标准在资格方面的种族差异比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;8(3):374-382. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6720.
2
Evaluating Eligibility of US Black Women Under USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.评估美国黑人女性是否符合 USPSTF 肺癌筛查指南标准。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):163-164. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5790.
3
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Screening Patterns Among Black and White Adults in the United States.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100350. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Characteristics of the Newly Eligible Population under Two Recent Updates of Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations.肺癌筛查建议最近两次更新下新符合条件人群的特征
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jun 2;18(6):365-373. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0465.
5
Easy ensemble classifier-group and intersectional fairness and threshold (EEC-GIFT): a fairness-aware machine learning framework for lung cancer screening eligibility using real-world data.简易集成分类器 - 组与交叉公平性及阈值(EEC - GIFT):一种使用真实世界数据进行肺癌筛查资格判定的公平感知机器学习框架。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Mar 3;9(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf030.
6
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography-where do we go from here?低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——我们从这里走向何方?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Dec 1;116(12):1878-1881. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae197.
7
Innovations in Early Lung Cancer Detection: Tracing the Evolution and Advancements in Screening.早期肺癌检测的创新:探寻筛查技术的演变与进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):4911. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164911.
8
Lung cancer screening eligibility and recruitment during routine care by pulmonologists: barriers and new opportunities in the Brazilian public healthcare system.肺科医生在常规医疗中进行肺癌筛查的资格与招募:巴西公共医疗体系中的障碍与新机遇
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Aug 19;50(3):e20240071. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240071.
9
Computational and experimental microfluidics: Total analysis system for mixing, sorting, and concentrating particles and cells.计算与实验微流控技术:用于混合、分选及浓缩颗粒和细胞的全分析系统
APL Bioeng. 2024 Apr 16;8(2):026101. doi: 10.1063/5.0158648. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.吸烟包年数:一种评估肺癌筛查资格的不充分且有偏差的方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 10;42(17):2026-2037. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01780. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
美国黑人和白人成年人的肺癌筛查资格和筛查模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130350. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30350.
4
Intersectionality of serious psychological distress, cigarette smoking, and substance use disorders in the United States: 2008-2018.美国严重心理困扰、吸烟和物质使用障碍的交叉性:2008-2018 年。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109095. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109095. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.肺癌筛查资格中的种族和民族差异。
Radiology. 2021 Dec;301(3):712-720. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204691. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Social determinants of health and cancer mortality in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study.社会决定因素与 Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) 队列研究中的癌症死亡率。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;128(1):122-130. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33894. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
The Impact of Residential Racial Segregation on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes.居住种族隔离对非小细胞肺癌治疗和结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.096. Epub 2021 May 23.
8
Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Cancer Care for Black People in the United States.美国黑人健康的社会决定因素与癌症护理差异
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):261-263. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00229.
9
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
10
Using Prediction Models to Reduce Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.利用预测模型减少 2020 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查指南草案中持续存在的种族和民族差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1590-1594. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa211.