• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

层次化复合拓扑揭示了物种相互作用网络的复杂结构。

Hierarchical compound topology uncovers complex structure of species interaction networks.

机构信息

Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13806. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1111/1365-2656.13806
PMID:36054553
Abstract

Nestedness and modularity have been found in many species interaction networks. Despite being conceptually distinct, negatively correlated and having different causes, these patterns often co-occur. A realistic but seldom investigated alternative to these simple topologies is hierarchical compound networks, in which the entire network is modular, and modules are internally nested. In compound networks, nestedness is suppressed by modularity at higher network hierarchical levels, but prevails at lower levels, within modules. The aims of this study are (i) to evaluate the prevalence of simple and hierarchical compound topologies in binary and weighted networks describing different kinds of species interactions and (ii) to probe the relationships between modularity and nestedness at different network hierarchical levels. With a procedure that discriminates between simple and compound structures, we re-analysed the topology of 142 well-studied binary networks including seed dispersal, host-parasite, pollination and plant-herbivore interactions; 68 of these also had quantitative information. Additionally, we tested the relationship between robustness and topology of binary networks and compared the robustness of networks with compound topologies to different sequences of species removals. Compound topologies were detected in 34% of binary and 71% of weighted networks of all interaction kinds. These results establish the hierarchical compound topology as a widespread network architecture, often undetected without quantitative data. Furthermore, they disentangle an apparent paradox: despite conflicting with overall nestedness, modularity usually co-occurs with high values of low-level nestedness. Nestedness progressively decreased, while modularity increased, from seed dispersal to host-parasite, pollination and plant-herbivore networks. There were no consistent differences in the robustness of networks with nested and compound topologies. However, compound topologies were especially vulnerable to removal sequences that accelerate the exclusion of entire modules. Compound topologies improve the depiction of ecological networks and differentiate ecological and evolutionary processes that operate at different hierarchical levels, with the potential to advance our understanding of network dynamics, stability and response to species loss or change. Quantitative data often reveal specialization patterns that are indistinguishable in binary networks, strongly improving the detection of modular and compound topologies.

摘要

嵌套性和模块性已在许多物种相互作用网络中被发现。尽管这些模式在概念上是不同的、负相关的且具有不同的原因,但它们经常同时出现。与这些简单拓扑结构相反的是,更现实但很少被研究的替代方案是层次复合网络,其中整个网络是模块化的,而模块内部嵌套。在复合网络中,嵌套性在较高的网络层次上被模块性抑制,但在较低的层次上,即在模块内部则占主导地位。本研究的目的是:(i)评估在描述不同种类物种相互作用的二值和加权网络中,简单和层次复合拓扑结构的出现频率;(ii)探究在不同网络层次上,模块性和嵌套性之间的关系。通过一种能够区分简单和复合结构的方法,我们重新分析了包括种子传播、宿主-寄生虫、授粉和植物-食草动物相互作用在内的 142 个经过充分研究的二值网络的拓扑结构;其中 68 个网络还有定量信息。此外,我们测试了二值网络的稳健性和拓扑结构之间的关系,并比较了具有复合拓扑结构的网络与不同物种去除序列的稳健性。在所有的相互作用类型中,复合拓扑结构在 34%的二值网络和 71%的加权网络中被检测到。这些结果确定了层次复合拓扑结构作为一种广泛存在的网络架构,在没有定量数据的情况下通常无法被检测到。此外,它们解开了一个看似矛盾的悖论:尽管与整体嵌套性相冲突,但模块性通常与低层次嵌套性的高值同时出现。嵌套性逐渐降低,而模块性从种子传播到宿主-寄生虫、授粉和植物-食草动物网络逐渐增加。具有嵌套和复合拓扑结构的网络在稳健性方面没有一致的差异。然而,复合拓扑结构特别容易受到加速整个模块排除的移除序列的影响。复合拓扑结构改善了生态网络的描述,并区分了在不同层次上运作的生态和进化过程,有可能促进我们对网络动态、稳定性和对物种损失或变化的反应的理解。定量数据经常揭示出在二值网络中无法区分的专业化模式,大大提高了对模块性和复合拓扑结构的检测能力。

相似文献

1
Hierarchical compound topology uncovers complex structure of species interaction networks.层次化复合拓扑揭示了物种相互作用网络的复杂结构。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13806. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
A new model explaining the origin of different topologies in interaction networks.一种解释交互网络中不同拓扑结构起源的新模型。
Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02796. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2796. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Nestedness interacts with subnetwork structures and interconnection patterns to affect community dynamics in ecological multilayer networks.嵌套结构与子网结构和相互连接模式相互作用,影响生态多层网络中的群落动态。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Apr;91(4):738-751. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13665. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
4
Patterns of interactions of a large fish-parasite network in a tropical floodplain.热带洪泛区大型鱼类-寄生虫网络的相互作用模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jul;81(4):905-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01967.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
5
Distinct responses of antagonistic and mutualistic networks to agricultural intensification.拮抗和互利网络对农业集约化的不同响应。
Ecology. 2020 Oct;101(10):e03116. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3116. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
6
Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: Incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks.从食果性到种子传播:将植物-食果动物网络中相互作用的功能结果纳入其中。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12831. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
7
The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat- and bird-fruit networks.种子扩散的模块性:蝙蝠和鸟类果实网络在结构和稳健性方面的差异。
Oecologia. 2011 Sep;167(1):131-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1984-2. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
8
Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin?生态网络中的嵌套性与模块性:同一枚硬币的两面?
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01688.x. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Human Impacts and Climate Change Influence Nestedness and Modularity in Food-Web and Mutualistic Networks.人类影响和气候变化影响食物网和互利网络的嵌套性与模块性。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 20;11(6):e0157929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157929. eCollection 2016.
10
Flexible foraging shapes the topology of plant-pollinator interaction networks.灵活觅食塑造了植物-传粉者相互作用网络的拓扑结构。
Ecology. 2016 Jun;97(6):1431-41. doi: 10.1890/15-1735.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural dynamics of plant-pollinator mutualistic networks.植物-传粉者互利网络的结构动态
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 8;3(6):pgae209. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae209. eCollection 2024 Jun.