Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13806. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Nestedness and modularity have been found in many species interaction networks. Despite being conceptually distinct, negatively correlated and having different causes, these patterns often co-occur. A realistic but seldom investigated alternative to these simple topologies is hierarchical compound networks, in which the entire network is modular, and modules are internally nested. In compound networks, nestedness is suppressed by modularity at higher network hierarchical levels, but prevails at lower levels, within modules. The aims of this study are (i) to evaluate the prevalence of simple and hierarchical compound topologies in binary and weighted networks describing different kinds of species interactions and (ii) to probe the relationships between modularity and nestedness at different network hierarchical levels. With a procedure that discriminates between simple and compound structures, we re-analysed the topology of 142 well-studied binary networks including seed dispersal, host-parasite, pollination and plant-herbivore interactions; 68 of these also had quantitative information. Additionally, we tested the relationship between robustness and topology of binary networks and compared the robustness of networks with compound topologies to different sequences of species removals. Compound topologies were detected in 34% of binary and 71% of weighted networks of all interaction kinds. These results establish the hierarchical compound topology as a widespread network architecture, often undetected without quantitative data. Furthermore, they disentangle an apparent paradox: despite conflicting with overall nestedness, modularity usually co-occurs with high values of low-level nestedness. Nestedness progressively decreased, while modularity increased, from seed dispersal to host-parasite, pollination and plant-herbivore networks. There were no consistent differences in the robustness of networks with nested and compound topologies. However, compound topologies were especially vulnerable to removal sequences that accelerate the exclusion of entire modules. Compound topologies improve the depiction of ecological networks and differentiate ecological and evolutionary processes that operate at different hierarchical levels, with the potential to advance our understanding of network dynamics, stability and response to species loss or change. Quantitative data often reveal specialization patterns that are indistinguishable in binary networks, strongly improving the detection of modular and compound topologies.
嵌套性和模块性已在许多物种相互作用网络中被发现。尽管这些模式在概念上是不同的、负相关的且具有不同的原因,但它们经常同时出现。与这些简单拓扑结构相反的是,更现实但很少被研究的替代方案是层次复合网络,其中整个网络是模块化的,而模块内部嵌套。在复合网络中,嵌套性在较高的网络层次上被模块性抑制,但在较低的层次上,即在模块内部则占主导地位。本研究的目的是:(i)评估在描述不同种类物种相互作用的二值和加权网络中,简单和层次复合拓扑结构的出现频率;(ii)探究在不同网络层次上,模块性和嵌套性之间的关系。通过一种能够区分简单和复合结构的方法,我们重新分析了包括种子传播、宿主-寄生虫、授粉和植物-食草动物相互作用在内的 142 个经过充分研究的二值网络的拓扑结构;其中 68 个网络还有定量信息。此外,我们测试了二值网络的稳健性和拓扑结构之间的关系,并比较了具有复合拓扑结构的网络与不同物种去除序列的稳健性。在所有的相互作用类型中,复合拓扑结构在 34%的二值网络和 71%的加权网络中被检测到。这些结果确定了层次复合拓扑结构作为一种广泛存在的网络架构,在没有定量数据的情况下通常无法被检测到。此外,它们解开了一个看似矛盾的悖论:尽管与整体嵌套性相冲突,但模块性通常与低层次嵌套性的高值同时出现。嵌套性逐渐降低,而模块性从种子传播到宿主-寄生虫、授粉和植物-食草动物网络逐渐增加。具有嵌套和复合拓扑结构的网络在稳健性方面没有一致的差异。然而,复合拓扑结构特别容易受到加速整个模块排除的移除序列的影响。复合拓扑结构改善了生态网络的描述,并区分了在不同层次上运作的生态和进化过程,有可能促进我们对网络动态、稳定性和对物种损失或变化的反应的理解。定量数据经常揭示出在二值网络中无法区分的专业化模式,大大提高了对模块性和复合拓扑结构的检测能力。