Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Centre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;50(9):1001-1012. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14148. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
To test the hypothesis that 0.01% atropine eyedrops are a safe and effective myopia-control approach in Australian children.
Children (6-16 years; 49% Europeans, 18% East Asian, 22% South Asian, and 12% other/mixed ancestry) with documented myopia progression were enrolled into this single-centre randomised, parallel, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial and randomised to receive 0.01% atropine (n = 104) or placebo (n = 49) eyedrops (2:1 ratio) instilled nightly over 24 months (mean index age = 12.2 ± 2.5 and 11.2 ± 2.8 years, respectively). Outcome measures were the changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) from baseline.
At 12 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline were -0.31D (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.39 to -0.22) and 0.16 mm (95%CI = 0.13-0.20) in the atropine group and -0.53D (95%CI = -0.66 to -0.40) and 0.25 mm (95%CI = 0.20-0.30) in the placebo group (group difference p ≤ 0.01). At 24 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline was -0.64D (95%CI = -0.73 to -0.56) and 0.34 mm (95%CI = 0.30-0.37) in the atropine group, and -0.78D (95%CI = -0.91 to -0.65) and 0.38 mm (95%CI = 0.33-0.43) in the placebo group. Group difference at 24 months was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). At 24 months, the atropine group had reduced accommodative amplitude and pupillary light response compared to the placebo group.
In Australian children, 0.01% atropine eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and had a modest myopia-control effect, although there was an apparent decrease in efficacy between 18 and 24 months, which is likely driven by a higher dropout rate in the placebo group.
为了验证 0.01%阿托品滴眼液是一种安全有效的澳大利亚儿童近视控制方法的假说。
这项单中心、随机、平行、双盲、安慰剂对照试验招募了有近视进展记录的儿童(6-16 岁;49%为欧洲人,18%为东亚人,22%为南亚人,12%为其他/混合血统),并将他们随机分为接受 0.01%阿托品(n=104)或安慰剂(n=49)滴眼液(2:1 比例)每晚滴眼 24 个月(平均指数年龄分别为 12.2±2.5 和 11.2±2.8 岁)。主要观察指标为从基线到球面等效(SE)和眼轴(AL)的变化。
12 个月时,与安慰剂组相比,阿托品组 SE 和 AL 的平均变化分别为-0.31D(95%置信区间[CI]为-0.39 至-0.22)和 0.16mm(95%CI 为 0.13 至 0.20),而安慰剂组分别为-0.53D(95%CI 为-0.66 至-0.40)和 0.25mm(95%CI 为 0.20 至 0.30)(组间差异 p≤0.01)。24 个月时,与安慰剂组相比,阿托品组 SE 和 AL 的平均变化分别为-0.64D(95%CI 为-0.73 至-0.56)和 0.34mm(95%CI 为 0.30 至 0.37),而安慰剂组分别为-0.78D(95%CI 为-0.91 至-0.65)和 0.38mm(95%CI 为 0.33 至 0.43)。24 个月时两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.10)。24 个月时,与安慰剂组相比,阿托品组的调节幅度和瞳孔对光反应降低。
在澳大利亚儿童中,0.01%阿托品滴眼液安全、耐受性好,且具有适度的近视控制效果,但在 18 至 24 个月之间疗效似乎有所下降,这可能是由于安慰剂组的辍学率较高所致。