Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Nutr Res. 2022 Sep;105:163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
Vegetarians (VEG) are reported to have lower body weight, blood pressure (BP), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared with omnivores (OMN), yet the mechanisms remain unclear. A vegetarian diet may protect the vascular endothelium, reducing the risk of atherosclerosis and CVD. This cross-sectional study compared vascular function between OMN and VEG. We hypothesized that VEG would have greater vascular function compared with OMN. Fifty-eight normotensive young healthy adults participated (40 women [W]/18 men [M]; 28 OMN [15W/13M] and 30 VEG [25W/5M]; 26 ± 7 years; BP: 112 ± 11/67 ± 8 mm Hg). Arterial stiffness, assessed by carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (OMN: 5.6 ± 0.8 m/s, VEG: 5.3 ± 0.8 m/s; P = .17) and wave reflection assessed by aortic augmentation index (OMN: 6.9 ± 12.3%, VEG: 8.8 ± 13.5%; P = .57) were not different between groups. However, central pulse pressure (OMN: 32 ± 5; VEG: 29 ± 5 mm Hg; P = .048) and forward wave reflection were greater in omnivores (OMN: 26 ± 3; VEG: 24 ± 3 mm Hg; P = .048). Endothelial-dependent dilation measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was not different between groups (OMN: 6.0 ± 2.9%, VEG: 6.9 ± 3.3%; P = .29). Percent change in femoral blood flow from baseline during passive leg movement, another assessment of nitric oxide-mediated endothelial dilation, was similar between groups (OMN: 203 ± 88 mL/min, VEG: 253 ± 192 mL/min; P = .50). These data suggest that in healthy young adults, normotensive VEG do not have significantly improved vascular function compared with OMN; however, they have a lower central pulse pressure and forward wave amplitude which may lower the risk of future CVD.
素食者(VEG)的体重、血压(BP)和心血管疾病(CVD)风险低于杂食者(OMN),但其机制尚不清楚。素食可能会保护血管内皮,降低动脉粥样硬化和 CVD 的风险。这项横断面研究比较了 OMN 和 VEG 之间的血管功能。我们假设 VEG 的血管功能会比 OMN 更好。58 名血压正常的年轻健康成年人参与了这项研究(40 名女性[W]/18 名男性[M];28 名 OMN[15W/13M]和 30 名 VEG[25W/5M];26±7 岁;血压:112±11/67±8mmHg)。颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(OMN:5.6±0.8m/s,VEG:5.3±0.8m/s;P=0.17)评估的动脉僵硬度和主动脉增强指数(OMN:6.9±12.3%,VEG:8.8±13.5%;P=0.57)在两组之间没有差异。然而,杂食者的中心脉搏压(OMN:32±5;VEG:29±5mmHg;P=0.048)和正向波反射更大。肱动脉血流介导的扩张测量的内皮依赖性舒张在两组之间没有差异(OMN:6.0±2.9%,VEG:6.9±3.3%;P=0.29)。从被动腿部运动的基线开始,股血流的变化百分比,另一种评估一氧化氮介导的内皮舒张,在两组之间相似(OMN:203±88mL/min,VEG:253±192mL/min;P=0.50)。这些数据表明,在健康的年轻成年人中,血压正常的素食者的血管功能与杂食者相比并没有显著改善;然而,他们的中心脉搏压和正向波幅度较低,这可能降低未来 CVD 的风险。