School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 131000, Vietnam.
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8454-8469. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21343. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
Panting score (PS) is a common research tool used to assess the physiological state of cows exposed to heat stress, but it is subjective. Infrared temperature (IRT), measured by either infrared thermometers or cameras, may be a more objective and reliable alternative. Very few studies thus far have evaluated the associations between PS, IRT, and milk production. We investigated the applicability of IRT compared with PS as a means of assessing heat stress and milk yield reduction in dairy cows in tropical smallholder dairy farms (SDF). In autumn 2017, SDF located across 4 typical dairy regions of Vietnam were each visited once to collect farm (n = 32) and individual cow data (n = 344). For each SDF, heat load index (HLI) inside the cowsheds, an indicator of environmental heat load calculated from ambient temperature, humidity, and wind speed, was measured. For each cow, PS (0 indicates a cow breathing normally, not panting; 4.5 indicates an extremely heat-stressed cow with excessive panting, tongue fully extended, and excessive drooling), IRT of the cow's body, single-day energy-corrected milk yield (ECM), body weight, and body condition score were measured. Cow genotype, age, lactation number, and days in milk were recorded. The IRT of the cows' inner vulval lip (IVuT) were measured with an infrared thermometer; and the IRT of the cows' vulval surface (OVuT), inner tail base surface (ITBT), ocular area, muzzle, armpit area, paralumbar fossa area, fore udder, rear udder, fore hoof, and hind hoof were also measured with an infrared camera. Multivariate mixed-effects models were used to assess the associations between HLI with PS and IRT, and associations between PS and IRT with ECM while accounting for the effects of other cow variables. All IRT correlated positively with PS (Pearson correlation, r = 0.23-0.50). Each unit increase in HLI was associated with increases of 0.07 units in PS and 0.09 to 0.23°C in IRT. Each degree (°C) increase in IVuT, OVuT, and ITBT was associated with decreases of 0.75, 0.87, and 0.70 kg/cow per day in ECM, respectively, whereas PS and other IRT were not significantly associated with ECM. Thus, all IRT showed potential to assess the heat stress level of cows; and IVuT, OVuT, and ITBT, but not PS and other IRT, showed potential to predict ECM reduction in cows during heat stress. First cross (F1) Holstein Brown Swiss and F1 Holstein Jersey showed lower PS and yielded higher ECM than the third backcross (B3) Holstein Zebu (7/8 Holstein + 1/8 Zebu) and pure Holstein. Thus, F1 Holstein Brown Swiss and F1 Holstein Jersey could be more suitable for tropical SDF than B3 Holstein Zebu and pure Holstein.
喘气评分(PS)是一种常用于评估受热应激奶牛生理状态的常用研究工具,但它具有主观性。通过红外测温仪或摄像机测量的红外温度(IRT)可能是一种更客观、更可靠的替代方法。迄今为止,很少有研究评估 PS 和 IRT 与牛奶产量之间的关联。我们研究了 IRT 与 PS 作为评估热带小规模奶牛场(SDF)奶牛热应激和牛奶产量下降的方法的适用性。2017 年秋季,我们对越南 4 个典型奶牛养殖区的 SDF 进行了一次访问,以收集农场(n=32)和个体奶牛数据(n=344)。对于每个 SDF,我们测量了牛舍内的热负荷指数(HLI),这是一个根据环境温度、湿度和风速计算的环境热负荷指标。对于每头奶牛,我们测量了 PS(0 表示奶牛呼吸正常,不喘气;4.5 表示极度热应激的奶牛,过度喘气,舌头完全伸出,口水过多)、奶牛身体的 IRT、单日能量校正奶产量(ECM)、体重和身体状况评分。还记录了奶牛的基因型、年龄、产奶次数和泌乳天数。我们使用红外测温仪测量奶牛的内阴唇(IVuT)的 IRT;并使用红外摄像机测量奶牛的外阴表面(OVuT)、内尾基底表面(ITBT)、眼部区域、口鼻区域、腋窝区域、腰旁窝区域、前乳房、后乳房、前脚和后脚的 IRT。我们使用多变量混合效应模型评估 HLI 与 PS 和 IRT 之间的关联,以及 PS 和 IRT 与 ECM 之间的关联,同时考虑了其他奶牛变量的影响。所有 IRT 与 PS 呈正相关(皮尔逊相关系数,r=0.23-0.50)。HLI 每增加一个单位,PS 增加 0.07 个单位,IRT 增加 0.09 到 0.23°C。IVuT、OVuT 和 ITBT 每增加 1°C,奶牛 ECM 每天分别减少 0.75、0.87 和 0.70 公斤/头,而 PS 和其他 IRT 与 ECM 无显著关联。因此,所有 IRT 都有可能评估奶牛的热应激水平;IVuT、OVuT 和 ITBT,但不是 PS 和其他 IRT,都有可能预测奶牛在热应激期间 ECM 的减少。第一杂交(F1)荷斯坦-棕色瑞士牛和 F1 荷斯坦-泽西牛的 PS 比第三杂交(B3)荷斯坦-黄牛(7/8 荷斯坦+1/8 黄牛)和纯荷斯坦牛低,产奶量高。因此,F1 荷斯坦-棕色瑞士牛和 F1 荷斯坦-泽西牛可能比 B3 荷斯坦-黄牛和纯荷斯坦牛更适合热带 SDF。