Health Consulting and Education HFSaude, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
School of Nursing-EEUSP, University of São Paulo - Adult Health Nursing Graduate Program-PROESA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3015-3029. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16508. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
To map and synthesise the existing literature on topical therapies for malignant fungating wounds pain management and the gaps involved.
Most cancer patients with malignant fungating wounds suffer from wound-related pain, affecting their quality of life. Unfortunately, even though pain is a relevant symptom in cancer and palliative care, little is currently known about topical treatments' availability and impact on pain management.
A scoping review following JBI® methodology METHODS: Searches were performed in CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, NICE, Scopus, JBISRIR and grey literature, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, with no time limit. Two authors independently reviewed all citations and a third was called in case of divergence, and studies in adults with malignant fungal wounds reporting topical pain interventions were included. In addition, a data extraction tool for synthesis and thematic analysis was developed. This study followed the PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
Seventy publications were selected from 796 records retrieved from databases. The studies mainly included non-systematic reviews and case studies with only six clinical trials. According to the narrative synthesis, twenty therapies were identified, including the use of wound dressings (58.6%), analgesic drugs (55.7%), topical antimicrobials (25.7%), skin barriers (15.7%), cryotherapy (5.7%) and negative pressure wound therapy (4.3%). Therapies were recommended to be applied to the wound bed or the periwound skin. In 68.5% of the studies, a standardised assessment for pain was not described.
Topical therapies applied to malignant fungating wounds or periwound areas had been examined for pain management. However, their effectiveness was analysed in a few interventional studies, indicating the need for further primary studies to inform evidence-based practice.
Highlighted topical therapies for clinical practice consideration are opioids, anaesthetics and antimicrobials, with positive results described in randomised clinical trials. This study did not include patients.
绘制并综合现有关于恶性肿瘤溃烂伤口疼痛管理的局部治疗的文献,并探讨其中存在的差距。
大多数患有恶性肿瘤溃烂伤口的癌症患者都遭受着与伤口相关的疼痛,这影响了他们的生活质量。不幸的是,尽管疼痛是癌症和姑息治疗中的一个相关症状,但目前对于局部治疗的可用性及其对疼痛管理的影响知之甚少。
遵循 JBI®方法的范围综述。
在 CINAHL、LILACS、Embase、Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane、NICE、Scopus、JBISRIR 和灰色文献中,以英文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文进行了无时间限制的搜索。两名作者独立审查了所有引文,如果有分歧,则由第三名作者介入,并纳入了报告恶性真菌性伤口局部疼痛干预措施的成人研究。此外,还开发了一个用于综合和主题分析的数据提取工具。本研究遵循 PRISMA-ScR 清单。
从数据库中检索到的 796 条记录中,共选择了 70 篇出版物。这些研究主要包括非系统性综述和病例研究,只有 6 项临床试验。根据叙述性综合分析,确定了 20 种治疗方法,包括使用伤口敷料(58.6%)、镇痛药物(55.7%)、局部抗菌药物(25.7%)、皮肤屏障(15.7%)、冷冻疗法(5.7%)和负压伤口治疗(4.3%)。建议将这些疗法应用于伤口床或伤口周围皮肤。在 68.5%的研究中,没有描述标准化的疼痛评估。
针对恶性肿瘤溃烂伤口或伤口周围区域的局部治疗已被用于疼痛管理。然而,它们的有效性仅在少数干预性研究中进行了分析,这表明需要进一步的基础研究来为循证实践提供信息。
在临床实践中,突出的局部治疗方法是阿片类药物、麻醉剂和抗菌药物,随机临床试验描述了这些方法的积极结果。本研究未纳入患者。