Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺是否应取代克林霉素成为A组链球菌坏死性软组织感染和中毒性休克综合征的辅助抗菌首选药物?一场聚焦辩论。

Should Linezolid Replace Clindamycin as the Adjunctive Antimicrobial of Choice in Group A Streptococcal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection and Toxic Shock Syndrome? A Focused Debate.

作者信息

Cortés-Penfield Nicolás, Ryder Jonathan H

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 13;76(2):346-350. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac720.

Abstract

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) necrotizing soft tissue infections and toxic shock syndrome remain high-mortality conditions. In vitro and animal model data, as well as multiple observational studies, suggest adjunctive clindamycin (ie, given with a beta-lactam) reduces invasive GAS infection mortality by inhibiting exotoxin production. Unfortunately, clindamycin resistance in GAS has been rapidly increasing in the United States since the mid-2010s, although the clinical significance of this remains unclear. Linezolid is a promising alternative adjunctive agent to which US GAS isolates remain near-universally susceptible, with a similar mechanism of action and similar in vitro evidence of GAS virulence factor attenuation. However, the clinical data supporting linezolid's value in severe GAS infections are far more limited. Here the authors review the data and reasoning behind a general preference for clindamycin or linezolid in a focused, pro-con debate format.

摘要

A组链球菌(GAS)坏死性软组织感染和中毒性休克综合征仍然是高致死性疾病。体外和动物模型数据以及多项观察性研究表明,辅助使用克林霉素(即与β-内酰胺类药物联合使用)可通过抑制外毒素产生降低侵袭性GAS感染的死亡率。不幸的是,自2010年代中期以来,美国GAS对克林霉素的耐药性一直在迅速增加,尽管其临床意义尚不清楚。利奈唑胺是一种有前景的替代辅助药物,美国的GAS分离株对其几乎普遍敏感,其作用机制相似,且有类似的体外证据表明其可减弱GAS毒力因子。然而,支持利奈唑胺在严重GAS感染中价值的临床数据要有限得多。在此,作者以聚焦的正反方辩论形式回顾了普遍倾向于使用克林霉素或利奈唑胺背后的数据和理由。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验