Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Centre, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 337-750 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada.
Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Centre, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 337-750 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada.
Prev Med. 2022 Oct;163:107236. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107236. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
We investigated the role of individual, community and vaccinator characteristics in mediating racial/ethnic disparities in the uptake of differentiated influenza vaccines (DIVs; including high-dose, adjuvanted, recombinant and cell-based vaccines). We included privately-insured (commercial and Medicare Advantage) ≥65 years-old community-dwelling health plan beneficiaries in the US with >1 year of continuous coverage and who received ≥1 influenza vaccine during the study period (July 2014-June 2018). Of 2.8 million distinct vaccination claims, 60% were for DIVs; lower if received in physician offices (49%) compared to pharmacies/facilities (74%). Among those vaccinated in physician offices, non-whites had lower odds of receiving a DIV if they lived in a non-minority county (0.77;95%CI 0.75-0.80) and even lower odds if they lived in a minority county (0.62;0.60-0.63). Differences in education, household income, medical history, community and vaccinator characteristics did not fully explain the disparities. Similar patterns emerged for vaccinations in pharmacies/facilities, although disparities disappeared altogether after controlling for socio-economic and vaccinator characteristics. When vaccinated in physician offices, minority county residents were less likely to receive a DIV, especially for non-whites (0.72;0.67-0.78). These disparities disappeared for whites, but not for non-whites, after controlling for community and vaccinator characteristics. We found an alarming level of inequity in DIV vaccine uptake among fully insured older adults that could not be fully explained by differences in sociodemographic, medical, community, and vaccinator characteristics. New strategies are urgently needed to address these inequities.
我们研究了个体、社区和接种者特征在调节不同流感疫苗(包括高剂量、佐剂、重组和细胞基疫苗)接种率的种族/民族差异方面的作用。我们纳入了美国有≥1 年连续保险(商业和 Medicare Advantage)且≥65 岁的、居住在社区的、在研究期间(2014 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月)接受≥1 次流感疫苗的健康计划受益人群。在 280 万份不同的疫苗接种记录中,有 60%是 DIV 接种记录;如果在医生办公室(49%)接种,而不是在药店/医疗机构(74%)接种,则接种率较低。在医生办公室接种的人群中,如果他们居住在非少数民族县(0.77;95%CI 0.75-0.80),那么他们接种 DIV 的可能性就会降低,如果他们居住在少数民族县(0.62;0.60-0.63),则接种的可能性就会更低。教育、家庭收入、病史、社区和接种者特征方面的差异并不能完全解释这些差异。在药店/医疗机构接种的情况也出现了类似的模式,尽管在控制了社会经济和接种者特征后,差异完全消失。在医生办公室接种的情况下,少数民族县的居民接种 DIV 的可能性较小,尤其是对于非白人(0.72;0.67-0.78)。在控制了社区和接种者特征后,白人的差异消失了,但非白人的差异仍然存在。我们发现,在完全保险的老年人中,不同流感疫苗的接种存在令人震惊的不平等现象,这不能完全用社会人口统计学、医学、社区和接种者特征的差异来解释。迫切需要新的策略来解决这些不平等问题。