• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股浅动脉长段病变腔内治疗联合股鞘切开的 1 年结果。

One-Year Results of Long femoropopliteal Lesions Stenting with Fasciotomy Lamina Vastoadductoria.

机构信息

Center for Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

Center for Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.032. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.032
PMID:36058457
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fasciotomy can increase the mobility of the superficial femoral artery and decrease the incidence of stent fractures. This study aimed to compare the long-term patency of drug-eluting nitinol stents with and without fasciotomy in patients with prolonged superficial femoral artery occlusions.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 (1:1) patients with long femoropopliteal steno-occlusive lesions >200 mm. Patients in group 1 (Zilver) underwent recanalization of femoropopliteal artery occlusion with stenting. In group 2 (ZilverFas), the femoropopliteal occlusion was recanalized with stenting and fasciotomy of Gunter's canal. The follow-up assessment of the patency took place after 6-12 months.

RESULTS

Twelve-month primary patency in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 51% and 80%, respectively (P = 0.02). The freedom from target lesion revascularization in the Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 50% and 76%, respectively (P = 0.04). At 1 year, primary-assisted patency and secondary patency for the ZilverFas and Zilver groups were 83% vs. 62% (P = 0.07) and 86% vs. 65% (P = 0.05), respectively. In the Zilver and ZilverFas groups, the number of stent fractures was 14 and 7, respectively (P = 0.05). The multivariable Cox regression indicated that the stent fracture and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of restenosis and reocclusion. Fasciotomy reduced the risk of reocclusion and restenosis by 2.94 times.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that decompressing the stented segment with fasciotomy significantly improves the patency of the femoropopliteal segment and significantly reduces the number and severity of stent fractures.

摘要

背景

筋膜切开术可以增加股浅动脉的活动性,降低支架断裂的发生率。本研究旨在比较经皮腔内血管成形术联合药物洗脱镍钛诺支架置入治疗股浅动脉长段闭塞患者中筋膜切开术与未行筋膜切开术的长期通畅率。

方法

在 60 例(1:1)股腘长段狭窄闭塞病变>200mm 的患者中进行了一项随机临床试验。组 1(Zilver)患者行股腘动脉闭塞开通及支架置入术,组 2(ZilverFas)患者行股腘动脉闭塞开通及支架置入联合筋膜切开术。术后 6-12 个月进行通畅率随访评估。

结果

Zilver 组和 ZilverFas 组 12 个月的初始通畅率分别为 51%和 80%(P=0.02)。Zilver 组和 ZilverFas 组的免于靶病变血运重建率分别为 50%和 76%(P=0.04)。在 1 年时,ZilverFas 组和 Zilver 组的初始辅助通畅率和二级通畅率分别为 83%比 62%(P=0.07)和 86%比 65%(P=0.05)。Zilver 组和 ZilverFas 组的支架断裂分别为 14 例和 7 例(P=0.05)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,支架断裂和糖尿病是再狭窄和再闭塞的独立预测因素。筋膜切开术使再闭塞和再狭窄的风险降低了 2.94 倍。

结论

本研究表明,筋膜切开术可显著改善股浅动脉段的通畅率,显著减少支架断裂的数量和严重程度。

相似文献

1
One-Year Results of Long femoropopliteal Lesions Stenting with Fasciotomy Lamina Vastoadductoria.股浅动脉长段病变腔内治疗联合股鞘切开的 1 年结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.032. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中 ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):287-295. doi: 10.1177/1526602820902014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Clinical outcomes of polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents vs stent grafts in peripheral arterial disease patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions.在股腘动脉病变的外周动脉疾病患者中,无聚合物、紫杉醇涂层支架与支架移植物的临床结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):1998-2008.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.061. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: The BATTLE Trial.载紫杉醇聚合物涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗首发股浅动脉病变的比较:BATTLE 试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.028.
5
Real-World Performance of Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Bare Metal Stenting (Zilver PTX) for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.紫杉醇药物洗脱裸金属支架(Zilver PTX)治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的真实世界疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
Vessel Calcification as a Risk Factor for In-Stent Restenosis in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions After Zilver PTX Paclitaxel-Coated Stent Placement.血管钙化是 Zilver PTX 紫杉醇涂层支架置入治疗复杂股腘动脉病变后支架内再狭窄的危险因素。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):613-620. doi: 10.1177/1526602819860124. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
PEACE I all-comers registry: patency evaluation after implantation of the 4-French Pulsar-18 self-expanding nitinol stent in femoropopliteal lesions.PEACE I 所有受试者注册研究:4 法国规格的 Pulsar-18 自膨式镍钛合金支架植入股腘动脉病变后的通畅性评估
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Jun;21(3):373-80. doi: 10.1583/13-4637R.1.
8
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent versus Prosthetic Above-the-Knee Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 5-year Results.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中,ZILVER PTX 支架与人工膝上旁路手术的比较,5 年结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1348-1358. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03549-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
9
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs. Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 3 year results and economic analysis.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中,ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较,3 年结果和经济分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Aug;64(4):413-421. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12607-3. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与无聚合物紫杉醇涂层支架(Zilver PTX)治疗下肢股腘动脉腔内介入治疗(IMPERIAL):一项随机非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32262-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Femoral Artery Stent Fractures.股动脉支架骨折的系统评价
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Aug 17;62:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.08.001. eCollection 2024.