• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中 ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较。

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions.

机构信息

A.Z. Sint-Blasius Hospital, Dendermonde, Belgium.

University of Siena, Italy.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):287-295. doi: 10.1177/1526602820902014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1177/1526602820902014
PMID:31997715
Abstract

To report the 12-month results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent was noninferior in terms of safety and efficacy compared with surgical bypass. This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft ( identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.4%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.6%). Most of the lesions were occlusions (208, 94.5%); the mean lesion length was 247.1±69.3 mm. The primary outcome measure was primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. The estimated 12-month primary patency rate was 74.5% (95% CI 66.3% to 82.7%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 72.5% (95% CI 63.7% to 81.3%) for the bypass arm (p=0.998). Freedom from TLR at 12 months was 80.9% (95% CI 73.3% to 88.5%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 76.2% (95% CI 68.0% to 84.4%) for the bypass group (p=0.471). The 30-day complication rate was significantly lower in the ZILVER PTX group (4.4% vs 11.3%, p=0.004). Also, procedure time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ZILVER PTX group (p<0.001 for both). With noninferior patency results, a lower complication rate, and shorter procedures and hospital stays, paclitaxel-eluting stenting might become a recommended treatment for long TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.

摘要

报告一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验的 12 个月结果,以确定 ZILVER PTX 紫杉醇洗脱支架在安全性和疗效方面是否不劣于手术旁路。这是一项针对有症状的跨大西洋腔内治疗协会共识(TASC)C 和 D 股腘病变的研究,比较了血管内 ZILVER PTX 支架置入与使用假体移植物的旁路手术(标识符 NCT01952457)。2013 年 10 月至 2017 年 7 月,共纳入 220 例患者(平均年龄 68.6±10.5 岁;159 例男性),并随机分为 ZILVER PTX 治疗组(113 例,51.4%)或旁路治疗组(107 例,48.6%)。大多数病变为闭塞(208 例,94.5%);平均病变长度为 247.1±69.3mm。主要终点为 12 个月时的一期通畅率,定义为靶病变或旁路移植段内无二元再狭窄或闭塞的证据,根据双功能超声衍生的峰值收缩速度比值<2.4 及腔内病例无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR)或旁路重建以恢复血流。ZILVER PTX 组的 12 个月一期通畅率估计为 74.5%(95%CI 66.3%至 82.7%),旁路组为 72.5%(95%CI 63.7%至 81.3%)(p=0.998)。ZILVER PTX 组 12 个月 TLR 无复发率为 80.9%(95%CI 73.3%至 88.5%),旁路组为 76.2%(95%CI 68.0%至 84.4%)(p=0.471)。ZILVER PTX 组 30 天并发症发生率显著低于旁路组(4.4%比 11.3%,p=0.004)。此外,ZILVER PTX 组的手术时间和住院时间明显缩短(p<0.001)。紫杉醇洗脱支架具有不劣的通畅率、较低的并发症发生率以及较短的手术和住院时间,可能成为 TASC C 和 D 股腘病变的推荐治疗方法。

相似文献

1
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中 ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):287-295. doi: 10.1177/1526602820902014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs. Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 3 year results and economic analysis.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中,ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较,3 年结果和经济分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Aug;64(4):413-421. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12607-3. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
Clinical outcomes of polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents vs stent grafts in peripheral arterial disease patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions.在股腘动脉病变的外周动脉疾病患者中,无聚合物、紫杉醇涂层支架与支架移植物的临床结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):1998-2008.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.061. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent versus Prosthetic Above-the-Knee Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 5-year Results.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中,ZILVER PTX 支架与人工膝上旁路手术的比较,5 年结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1348-1358. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03549-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: The BATTLE Trial.载紫杉醇聚合物涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗首发股浅动脉病变的比较:BATTLE 试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.028.
6
Real-World Performance of Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Bare Metal Stenting (Zilver PTX) for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.紫杉醇药物洗脱裸金属支架(Zilver PTX)治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的真实世界疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
7
Vessel Calcification as a Risk Factor for In-Stent Restenosis in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions After Zilver PTX Paclitaxel-Coated Stent Placement.血管钙化是 Zilver PTX 紫杉醇涂层支架置入治疗复杂股腘动脉病变后支架内再狭窄的危险因素。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):613-620. doi: 10.1177/1526602819860124. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
One Year Outcomes of Zilver PTX Versus Eluvia for Femoropopliteal Disease in Real-World Practice: REALDES Study.在真实世界实践中,Zilver PTX与Eluvia治疗股腘动脉疾病的一年结局:REALDES研究
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr;32(2):490-497. doi: 10.1177/15266028231179861. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
9
A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与无聚合物紫杉醇涂层支架(Zilver PTX)治疗下肢股腘动脉腔内介入治疗(IMPERIAL):一项随机非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32262-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
10
The Zilver® PTX® Single Arm Study: 12-month results from the TASC C/D lesion subgroup.Zilver® PTX® 单臂研究:TASC C/D 病变亚组的 12 个月结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2013 Feb;54(1):115-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing and utilizing innovative technologies in health care systems: a country comparison for peripheral drug-eluting stents in Germany and the USA.在医疗保健系统中引入和应用创新技术:德国和美国外周药物洗脱支架的国别比较
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;13:1488091. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1488091. eCollection 2025.
2
Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for femoropopliteal arterial disease: A meta-analysis.紫杉醇涂层球囊与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗股腘动脉疾病的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 21;104(12):e41949. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041949.
3
Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Bypass and Endovascular Revascularisation for Peripheral Artery Disease.
比较外周动脉疾病搭桥术和血管内血运重建术的随机对照试验的Meta分析
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Apr;59(3):277-287. doi: 10.1177/15385744241292123. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Systematic Review of Femoral Artery Stent Fractures.股动脉支架骨折的系统评价
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Aug 17;62:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.08.001. eCollection 2024.
5
Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease.药物洗脱装置治疗下肢外周动脉疾病。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1136-e1153. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01080.
6
Association between statin intensity and femoropopliteal stent primary patency in peripheral arterial disease.他汀类药物强度与外周动脉疾病中股腘动脉支架初次通畅率之间的关联。
CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Aug 3;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00472-4.
7
Diversity in randomized clinical trials for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review.外周动脉疾病随机临床试验中的多样性:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 13;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02104-8.
8
Treatment of Complex Femoro-popliteal Lesions: Time to Revise the Guidelines According to Clinical Reality.复杂股腘病变的治疗:根据临床实际情况修订指南的时候到了。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1769-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03589-6. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
9
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent versus Prosthetic Above-the-Knee Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 5-year Results.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中,ZILVER PTX 支架与人工膝上旁路手术的比较,5 年结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1348-1358. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03549-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
10
Endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical revascularization for patients with lower extremity artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.下肢动脉疾病患者的血管内血运重建与开放手术血运重建:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 24;10:1223841. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1223841. eCollection 2023.