[Efficacy comparison of minimally invasive atlantoaxial mass fusion and open atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation].

To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive intermuscular atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion (Mis-PALF) and open atlantoaxial fusion in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation. The clinical data of patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who received Mis-PALF operation (17 cases) or open atlantoaxial fusion (88 cases, as control) in the Third Hospital of Peking University from September 2015 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. In Mis-PALF group, there were 9 males and 8 females, aged (45.8±19.8) years; and there were 48 males and 40 females in the control group, aged (50.0±13.9) years. The operation time, perioperative blood loss, postoperative body temperature, postoperative pain [assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS)], postoperative additional analgesic drugs, postoperative hospitalization time, the improvement rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores of spinal cord function in three-months follow-up and complications were compared between the two groups. Mis-PALF group had less perioperative blood loss than control group [(111.8±35.9)ml vs (362.9±18.6)ml, <0.01], shorter hospitalization time [(3.06±0.63) days vs (4.24±0.14) days, <0.01] and fewer additional analgesic drugs (3/17 vs 56/88, <0.01). There was no significant difference between the Mis-PALF and control group in operation time [(125±7)min vs (113±8)min, =0.525], patients with fever(11/17 vs 37/88, =0.086) or postoperative pain (1/17 vs 13/88, =0.357), the improvement rate of JOA score (66.9%±28.8% vs 74.2%±28.6%, =0.409) and complications rate (1/17 vs 3/88, =1.000). Mis-PALF can significantly reduce the perioperative blood loss, shorten the postoperative hospitalization time and the additionally use of analgesic drugs without increasing complications.