Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported overall survival benefit of triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent [ARAT], docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) over that of doublet therapy (docetaxel and ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Ranking of therapy options and comparisons between triplet therapy and doublet ARAT and ADT therapy are scarce.
To rank therapy options (triplet vs doublet [docetaxel and ADT] vs doublet [ARAT and ADT]) and address them within formal network meta-analyses (NMAs); subsequently, NMAs were refitted following stratification according to (1) low- and high-volume tumor burden and (2) doublet versus triplet therapy.
A systematic literature review (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane database) of RCT trials that investigated the overall survival efficacy of systemic treatment in the setting of mHSPC was conducted. The study search and inclusion criteria were in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
Ten RCTs (n = 9702) were identified. The NMA focusing on the overall cohort of mHSPC demonstrated that triplet therapies (darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT, and abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) were ranked first and second (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.66; HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78), followed by doublet therapy (ARAT and ADT) and lastly docetaxel and ADT. Owing to missing data within one RCT, the NMA for low- and high-volume mHSPC focused on nine trials. In high-volume disease, triplet therapy (abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) was ranked first (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.71).
Triplet therapy, consisting of an ARAT, docetaxel, and ADT, ranked first in systematic treatment in mHSPC. Moreover, triplet therapy might result in more pronounced overall survival benefit than doublet ARAT and ADT therapy in high-volume mHSPC.
We compared different systemic therapy options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and concluded that triplet therapy, consisting of androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent, docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy, seems to be most beneficial for overall survival. Back to top.
两项最近的随机对照试验(RCT)报告称,在转移性激素敏感前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者中,三联疗法(雄激素受体轴靶向治疗药物[ARAT]、多西他赛和雄激素剥夺治疗[ADT])的总生存获益优于二联疗法(多西他赛和 ADT)。三联疗法与二联 ARAT 和 ADT 治疗相比,治疗方案的排序和比较很少。
对治疗方案(三联 vs 二联[多西他赛和 ADT] vs 二联[ARAT 和 ADT])进行排序,并在正式的网络荟萃分析(NMA)中进行处理;随后,根据(1)低肿瘤负荷和高肿瘤负荷和(2)二联与三联疗法对 NMA 进行分层后进行重新拟合。
对 mHSPC 中系统治疗总生存疗效的 RCT 试验进行了系统文献复习(PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库)。研究检索和纳入标准符合系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。
确定了 10 项 RCT 研究(n=9702)。针对 mHSPC 整个队列的 NMA 表明,三联疗法(达罗他胺、多西他赛和 ADT,以及阿比特龙、多西他赛和 ADT)排名第一和第二(风险比[HR]:0.54,95%置信区间[CI]:0.44-0.66;HR:0.60;95%CI:0.46-0.78),其次是二联疗法(ARAT 和 ADT),最后是多西他赛和 ADT。由于一项 RCT 中存在缺失数据,低肿瘤负荷和高肿瘤负荷 mHSPC 的 NMA 集中在 9 项试验上。在高肿瘤负荷疾病中,三联疗法(阿比特龙、多西他赛和 ADT)排名第一(HR:0.52,95%CI:0.38-0.71)。
包含 ARAT、多西他赛和 ADT 的三联疗法在 mHSPC 的系统治疗中排名第一。此外,在高肿瘤负荷 mHSPC 中,三联疗法可能比二联 ARAT 和 ADT 治疗带来更显著的总生存获益。
我们比较了转移性激素敏感前列腺癌的不同系统治疗选择,并得出结论,三联疗法(包括雄激素受体轴靶向治疗药物、多西他赛和雄激素剥夺治疗)似乎对总生存最有益。