• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌间质近距离放疗中不同优化算法的剂量学评估

Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma.

作者信息

Srivastava Shraddha, Singh Navin, Kashyap Varun Kumar

机构信息

PhD, Department of Radiotherapy King George's Medical University Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

PhD, Department of Community Medicine, HIMSAR, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Aug 1;12(4):339-348. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2104-1306. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2104-1306
PMID:36059288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9395632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional optimization techniques are based on the planning approach in which positions and weights are varied to generate the desired dose distribution. Inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) is an advanced optimization method developed to automatically determine a suitable combination of positions to design an acceptable plan.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, three optimization techniques namely IPSA, graphical optimization (GROPT), and geometrical optimization (GOPT) methods are compared in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, twenty computed tomography (CT) data sets of 10 cervical cancer patients treated with Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template-based interstitial brachytherapy were studied. The treatment plans generated were optimized using the IPSA, and GOPT methods. The prescribed dose was 24 Gy in 4 fractions. Plans produced using IPSA, GrOPT, and GOPT techniques were analyzed for comparison of dosimetric parameters, including target coverage, homogeneity, conformity, and organs at risk (OAR) doses.

RESULTS

V100 values for IPSA, GrOPT and GOPT plans were 95.81±2.33%, 93.12±2.76% and 88.90±4.95%, respectively. The mean D90 values for the IPSA, GrOPT, and GOPT plans were 6.45±0.15 Gy, 6.12±0.21 Gy, and 5.85±0.57 Gy, respectively. Significantly lower doses of OAR were in the IPSA plans that were more homogeneous (HI=0.66). Conformity was comparatively higher in IPSA-based plans (CI=0.75).

CONCLUSION

IPSA plans were superior and resulted in better target coverage, homogeneity, conformity, and minimal OAR doses.

摘要

背景

传统的优化技术基于规划方法,即通过改变位置和权重来生成所需的剂量分布。逆向计划模拟退火(IPSA)是一种先进的优化方法,旨在自动确定合适的位置组合以设计出可接受的计划。

目的

在本研究中,比较了三种优化技术,即IPSA、图形优化(GROPT)和几何优化(GOPT)方法在宫颈癌高剂量率组织间近距离治疗中的应用。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性研究中,研究了10例接受基于马丁内斯通用会阴组织间模板的组织间近距离治疗的宫颈癌患者的20组计算机断层扫描(CT)数据集。使用IPSA和GOPT方法对生成的治疗计划进行优化。处方剂量为24 Gy,分4次给予。分析了使用IPSA、GrOPT和GOPT技术生成的计划,以比较剂量学参数,包括靶区覆盖、均匀性、适形性和危及器官(OAR)剂量。

结果

IPSA、GrOPT和GOPT计划的V100值分别为95.81±2.33%、93.12±2.76%和88.90±4.95%。IPSA、GrOPT和GOPT计划的平均D90值分别为6.45±0.15 Gy、6.12±0.21 Gy和5.85±0.57 Gy。IPSA计划中OAR的剂量显著较低,且更均匀(HI=0.66)。基于IPSA的计划的适形性相对较高(CI=0.75)。

结论

IPSA计划更优,能实现更好的靶区覆盖、均匀性、适形性,并使OAR剂量最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/f515c2ef4a00/JBPE-12-339-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/aeb78bab998b/JBPE-12-339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/6750b23219b3/JBPE-12-339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/9320bf2328dd/JBPE-12-339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/c0afecd089b6/JBPE-12-339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/f515c2ef4a00/JBPE-12-339-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/aeb78bab998b/JBPE-12-339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/6750b23219b3/JBPE-12-339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/9320bf2328dd/JBPE-12-339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/c0afecd089b6/JBPE-12-339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13d/9395632/f515c2ef4a00/JBPE-12-339-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma.宫颈癌间质近距离放疗中不同优化算法的剂量学评估
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Aug 1;12(4):339-348. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2104-1306. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy.计划质量评分评估基于模板的间质近距离放射治疗中采用模拟退火和图形优化的限制逆规划的停留时间偏差。
Cancer Radiother. 2023 May;27(3):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.10.006. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.驻留时间偏差约束对逆向近距离治疗计划的剂量学影响,以及与传统优化方法在间质近距离治疗植入物中的比较。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):463-470. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_749_19.
4
Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.宫颈癌近距离治疗中图形优化与逆向计划模拟退火的剂量学比较
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2019 Aug;11(4):379-383. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2019.87145. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.高剂量率近距离放射治疗中基于体积的剂量优化与基于逆向计划模拟退火的剂量优化的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2015 Autumn;40(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors.浅表阴道肿瘤多通道腔内近距离放射治疗优化方法的剂量学比较
Brachytherapy. 2013 Nov-Dec;12(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
7
Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.两种宫颈癌近距离治疗逆向计划算法的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Mar;22(3):157-165. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13195. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.腔内和间质近距离放疗联合治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的逆向计划。
J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1146-52. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt072. Epub 2013 May 31.
9
Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症间质近距离放疗中逆向计划模拟退火[IPSA]与混合逆向计划优化[HIPO]的剂量优化比较研究。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;52(3):417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers.IPSA与剂量点优化和手动优化在妇科癌症组织间模板近距离放射治疗中的比较。
Brachytherapy. 2011 Jul-Aug;10(4):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.宫颈癌近距离放疗混合逆向计划与优化的剂量学和放射生物学评估
Anticancer Res. 2015 Nov;35(11):6091-6.
2
Comparison and consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for CT- and MR-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.基于 CT 和 MRI 的局部晚期宫颈癌近距离放疗临床靶区勾画的比较和共识指南。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Oct 1;90(2):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.005.
3
Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional.
局部晚期宫颈癌的根治性放射治疗:近距离放射治疗不可或缺。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):537-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.011. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
4
Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.腔内和间质近距离放疗联合治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的逆向计划。
J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1146-52. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt072. Epub 2013 May 31.
5
Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers.IPSA与剂量点优化和手动优化在妇科癌症组织间模板近距离放射治疗中的比较。
Brachytherapy. 2011 Jul-Aug;10(4):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
6
Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.高剂量率前列腺近距离放射治疗中基于解剖结构的逆向计划模拟退火优化:相较于其他优化技术具有显著的剂量学优势。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 1;72(3):820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 1.
7
A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.基于解剖结构的逆向计划与模拟退火和图形优化在高剂量率前列腺近距离治疗中的比较。
Brachytherapy. 2008 Jan-Mar;7(1):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Inverse planning approach for 3-D MRI-based pulse-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervix cancer.基于三维磁共振成像的宫颈癌脉冲剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗逆向计划方法
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):955-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2321.
9
Anatomy-based inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: comparison of incidence of acute genitourinary toxicity between anatomy-based inverse optimization and geometric optimization.基于解剖结构的逆向优化在高剂量率近距离放疗联合低分割外照射放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌中的应用:基于解剖结构的逆向优化与几何优化之间急性泌尿生殖系统毒性发生率的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Apr 1;64(5):1360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.005. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
10
3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.宫颈癌串联及卵圆形施源器的三维逆向治疗计划
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 15;63(4):1270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.972.