Suppr超能文献

安罗替尼联合程序性死亡受体-1阻断剂与安罗替尼单药作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌二线或后续治疗的疗效及安全性:一项回顾性研究

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus programmed death-1 blockade versus anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Liu Ying, Ge Qingqing, Xu Shuning, Li Ke, Liu Ying

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 17;12:942678. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942678. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade have been approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the combination of these two therapies has not been evaluated. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, combined with PD-1 blockade as second or further-line treatment for advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and February 2021, 98 advanced ESCC patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade or anlotinib monotherapy as second or further-line treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade were grouped as cohort A (n=48), while those receiving anlotinib monotherapy were grouped as cohort B (n=50). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Data was collected until May 1, 2021, with a median follow-up time of 9.30 months (8.23-10.37 months) in cohort A and11.10months (7.82-14.38 months) in cohort B. For patients with advanced ESCC, cohort A resulted in significantly longer PFS (5.40 vs. 3.00 months, P<0.001) and higher DCR (71.7% vs. 47.9%, P=0.019) than cohort B. The ORR indicated no significant difference between cohort A (23.9%) and cohort B (10.4%) (P=0.082). Adverse reactions were mainly grade1/2 in the two groups. Compared with cohort B, a significantly higher rate of grade 1-2 hypothyroidism was observed in patients in cohort A (P= 0.034). Three patients (6.3%) developed grade 1/2 immune-related pneumonia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the drug regimen (P<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (P=0.002), distant organ metastasis (P=0.008), and metastatic sites (P=0.032) were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity as second or further-line treatment of advanced ESCC.

摘要

背景

安罗替尼和程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)阻断剂均已获批用于转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的二线治疗。然而,这两种疗法的联合应用尚未得到评估。本研究调查了安罗替尼(一种靶向肿瘤血管生成的新型多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)联合PD-1阻断剂作为晚期ESCC二线或后续治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年2月在河南省肿瘤医院接受安罗替尼联合PD-1阻断剂或安罗替尼单药治疗作为二线或后续治疗的98例晚期ESCC患者。接受安罗替尼联合PD-1阻断剂治疗的患者分为A组(n=48),接受安罗替尼单药治疗的患者分为B组(n=50)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和毒性。此外,通过Cox回归分析确定独立预后因素。双侧p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

数据收集至2021年5月1日,A组中位随访时间为9.30个月(8.23-10.37个月),B组为11.10个月(7.82-14.38个月)。对于晚期ESCC患者,A组的PFS显著长于B组(5.40个月对3.00个月,P<0.001),DCR也高于B组(71.7%对47.9%,P=0.019)。ORR显示A组(23.9%)和B组(10.4%)之间无显著差异(P=0.082)。两组不良反应主要为≤2级。与B组相比,A组患者甲状腺功能减退1-2级的发生率显著更高(P=0.034)。3例患者(6.3%)发生1/2级免疫相关肺炎。3/4级毒性发生率无显著差异。多变量Cox回归分析显示,药物治疗方案(P<0.001)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(P=0.002)、远处器官转移(P=0.008)和转移部位(P=0.032)是PFS的独立预后因素。

结论

安罗替尼联合PD-1阻断剂作为晚期ESCC的二线或后续治疗显示出有前景的抗肿瘤活性和可管理的毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fed2/9428701/36a54db6b169/fonc-12-942678-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验