Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Department of HPB Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Aug;26(8):2006-2019. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03425-4. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Anlotinib has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in various solid tumors. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that immune therapy can enhance the systemic responses of anlotinib. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining anlotinib with PD-1 inhibitors compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy as a second-line treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).
A total of 242 patients with BTCs were screened at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2022. Among them, 78 patients who received either anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (AP) or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (FB) as second-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and predictive tumor biomarkers.
Among the 78 patients with BTCs, 39 patients received AP, while 39 patients were administered FB. The ORR in the AP group was 20.5%, compared to 5.1% in the FB group. The DCR was 87.2% in the AP group and 66.7% in the FB group. The AP group demonstrated significantly better ORR and DCR compared to the FB group (p = 0.042, p = 0.032). The median PFS and OS in the AP group were 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.35-11.45) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.39-22.41), respectively. In the FB group, the median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.17-5.03) and 13.2 months (95% CI: 8.72-17.68), respectively. The AP group exhibited significantly better median PFS than the FB group (p = 0.027). In the subgroup analysis, patients without liver metastasis had a much longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (14.3 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.016). Similarly, patients with CEA ≤ 5 μg/L also demonstrated a longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (8.7 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.008).
The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a promising clinical effect compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of refractory advanced BTCs. Liver metastases and CEA levels may serve as predictive factors for identifying patients who may benefit from AP therapy.
安罗替尼在各种实体瘤中显示出有前景的抗肿瘤疗效。此外,有证据表明免疫治疗可以增强安罗替尼的全身反应。本研究旨在评估安罗替尼联合 PD-1 抑制剂与氟嘧啶类化疗作为晚期胆道癌(BTC)二线治疗方案相比的有效性和安全性。
2015 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月,郑州大学第一附属医院共筛选了 242 例 BTC 患者。其中,78 例患者接受安罗替尼联合 PD-1 抑制剂(AP)或氟嘧啶类化疗(FB)作为二线治疗,纳入本研究。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)、安全性和预测性肿瘤生物标志物。
在 78 例 BTC 患者中,39 例患者接受 AP 治疗,39 例患者接受 FB 治疗。AP 组的 ORR 为 20.5%,而 FB 组为 5.1%。AP 组的 DCR 为 87.2%,而 FB 组为 66.7%。AP 组的 ORR 和 DCR 明显优于 FB 组(p=0.042,p=0.032)。AP 组的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7.9 个月(95%CI:4.35-11.45)和 13.9 个月(95%CI:5.39-22.41)。FB 组的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 4.1 个月(95%CI:3.17-5.03)和 13.2 个月(95%CI:8.72-17.68)。AP 组的中位 PFS 明显长于 FB 组(p=0.027)。在亚组分析中,无肝转移的患者在 AP 组的 PFS 明显长于 FB 组(14.3 对 5.5 个月,p=0.016)。同样,CEA≤5μg/L 的患者在 AP 组的 PFS 也明显长于 FB 组(8.7 对 3.9 个月,p=0.008)。
安罗替尼联合 PD-1 抑制剂与氟嘧啶类化疗相比,在难治性晚期 BTC 的二线治疗中显示出有前景的临床效果。肝转移和 CEA 水平可能是识别可能从 AP 治疗中获益的患者的预测因素。