• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去在确定多标准决策合适的归一化方法方面所做的努力:简要综述。

Past efforts in determining suitable normalization methods for multi-criteria decision-making: A short survey.

作者信息

Krishnan Anath Rau

机构信息

Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Labuan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Front Big Data. 2022 Aug 18;5:990699. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.990699. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fdata.2022.990699
PMID:36059923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9433668/
Abstract

The use of a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique mostly begins with normalizing the incommensurable data values in the decision matrix. Numerous normalization methods are available in the literature and applying different normalization methods to an MCDM technique is proven to deliver varying results. As such, selecting suitable normalization methods for an MCDM technique has emerged as an intriguing research topic, especially with the advent of big data. Several efforts have been made to compare the suitability of various normalization methods, but regrettably, no paper provides an updated review of these crucial efforts. This study, therefore, aimed to trace articles reporting such efforts and review them based on the following three perspectives: (1) the normalization methods considered, (2) the MCDM methods considered, and (3) the comparison metrics used to determine the suitable normalization methods. The relevant articles were extracted with the aid of Google Scholar using the keywords of "normalization" and "MCDM," and Tableau software was used to analyze further the data gathered through the articles. A total of five limitations were uncovered based on the current state of literature, and potential future works to address those limitations were offered. This paper is the first to compile and review the previous investigations that compared and determined the ideal normalization methods for an MCDM technique.

摘要

多准则决策(MCDM)技术的使用通常始于对决策矩阵中不可通约的数据值进行归一化处理。文献中存在多种归一化方法,事实证明,将不同的归一化方法应用于MCDM技术会产生不同的结果。因此,为MCDM技术选择合适的归一化方法已成为一个引人关注的研究课题,尤其是在大数据出现之后。人们已经做出了一些努力来比较各种归一化方法的适用性,但遗憾的是,没有论文对这些重要的努力进行更新的综述。因此,本研究旨在追踪报道此类努力的文章,并基于以下三个视角对其进行综述:(1)所考虑的归一化方法;(2)所考虑的MCDM方法;(3)用于确定合适归一化方法的比较指标。借助谷歌学术,使用“归一化”和“MCDM”作为关键词提取相关文章,并使用Tableau软件进一步分析通过这些文章收集的数据。基于当前的文献状况共发现了五个局限性,并提出了应对这些局限性的潜在未来工作。本文首次汇编并综述了之前比较和确定MCDM技术理想归一化方法的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/5beced9d72f6/fdata-05-990699-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/c8443e8a904c/fdata-05-990699-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/0aae21d350ba/fdata-05-990699-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/5beced9d72f6/fdata-05-990699-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/c8443e8a904c/fdata-05-990699-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/0aae21d350ba/fdata-05-990699-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d80/9433668/5beced9d72f6/fdata-05-990699-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Past efforts in determining suitable normalization methods for multi-criteria decision-making: A short survey.过去在确定多标准决策合适的归一化方法方面所做的努力:简要综述。
Front Big Data. 2022 Aug 18;5:990699. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.990699. eCollection 2022.
2
An investigation to offer conclusive recommendations on suitable benefit/cost criteria-based normalization methods for TOPSIS.一项关于为TOPSIS提供基于合适的效益/成本标准的归一化方法的结论性建议的调查。
MethodsX. 2023 May 30;10:102227. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102227. eCollection 2023.
3
GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: A comprehensive review of the literature.基于 GIS 的多准则决策模型在垃圾填埋场选址适宜性分析中的应用:文献综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(30):30711-30730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06298-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.可持续废物处理技术选择:分层最佳最差多准则决策方法。
Waste Manag. 2021 Mar 1;122:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.040. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
A survey of multi-criteria decision-making techniques for green logistics and low-carbon transportation systems.绿色物流与低碳运输系统的多准则决策技术综述
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):57279-57301. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26577-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
A decision analysis model for material selection using simple ranking process.基于简单排序过程的选材决策分析模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 27;13(1):8631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35405-z.
7
Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review.糖尿病管理与决策支持中的多标准决策:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Feb 1;12:e47701. doi: 10.2196/47701.
8
Impact of Normalization on Entropy-Based Weights in Hellwig's Method: A Case Study on Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Education Area.归一化对赫尔维格方法中基于熵的权重的影响:以教育领域可持续发展评估为例
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;26(5):365. doi: 10.3390/e26050365.
9
A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.一种基于平衡计分卡方法的用于研究与技术组织绩效评估的新型混合多准则决策模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:125-140. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.一种用于ETL软件选择的集成多准则决策AHP-TOPSIS方法的应用。
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 2;5:263. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation to offer conclusive recommendations on suitable benefit/cost criteria-based normalization methods for TOPSIS.一项关于为TOPSIS提供基于合适的效益/成本标准的归一化方法的结论性建议的调查。
MethodsX. 2023 May 30;10:102227. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102227. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a multi-criteria decision-making approach to a new party's election campaign - A case study.将多标准决策方法应用于新政党的选举活动——一个案例研究。
MethodsX. 2021 Apr 9;8:101328. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101328. eCollection 2021.
2
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.谷歌学术、微软学术、Scopus、Dimensions、科学网以及开放引文的COCI:基于引文的多学科覆盖范围比较
Scientometrics. 2021;126(1):871-906. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4. Epub 2020 Sep 21.