• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于孕产妇健康的机器学习:预测桑给巴尔社区卫生工作者项目中的分娩地点。

Machine learning for maternal health: Predicting delivery location in a community health worker program in Zanzibar.

作者信息

Fredriksson Alma, Fulcher Isabel R, Russell Allyson L, Li Tracey, Tsai Yi-Ting, Seif Samira S, Mpembeni Rose N, Hedt-Gauthier Bethany

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;4:855236. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.855236. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2022.855236
PMID:36060544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9428344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal and neonatal health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have improved over the last two decades. However, many pregnant women still deliver at home, which increases the health risks for both the mother and the child. Community health worker programs have been broadly employed in LMICs to connect women to antenatal care and delivery locations. More recently, employment of digital tools in maternal health programs have resulted in better care delivery and served as a routine mode of data collection. Despite the availability of rich, patient-level data within these digital tools, there has been limited utilization of this type of data to inform program delivery in LMICs.

METHODS

We use program data from 38,787 women enrolled in Safer Deliveries a community health worker program in Zanzibar, to build a generalizable prediction model that accurately predicts whether a newly enrolled pregnant woman will deliver in a health facility. We use information collected during the enrollment visit, including demographic data, health characteristics and current pregnancy information. We apply four machine learning methods: logistic regression, LASSO regularized logistic regression, random forest and an artificial neural network; and three sampling techniques to address the imbalanced data: undersampling of facility deliveries, oversampling of home deliveries and addition of synthetic home deliveries using SMOTE.

RESULTS

Our models correctly predicted the delivery location for 68%-77% of the women in the test set, with slightly higher accuracy when predicting facility delivery versus home delivery. A random forest model with a balanced training set created using undersampling of existing facility deliveries accurately identified 74.4% of women delivering at home.

CONCLUSIONS

This model can provide a "real-time" prediction of the delivery location for new maternal health program enrollees and may enable early provision of extra support for individuals at risk of not delivering in a health facility, which has potential to improve health outcomes for both mothers and their newborns. The framework presented here is applicable in other contexts and the selection of input features can easily be adapted to match data availability and other outcomes, both within and beyond maternal health.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的孕产妇和新生儿健康状况有所改善。然而,许多孕妇仍在家中分娩,这增加了母亲和孩子的健康风险。社区卫生工作者项目已在低收入和中等收入国家广泛采用,以帮助妇女获得产前护理和分娩地点。最近,在孕产妇健康项目中使用数字工具提高了护理质量,并成为常规的数据收集方式。尽管这些数字工具中存在丰富的患者层面数据,但在低收入和中等收入国家,这类数据在为项目实施提供信息方面的利用有限。

方法

我们使用来自坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔“安全分娩”社区卫生工作者项目中38787名妇女的项目数据,构建一个可推广的预测模型,以准确预测新登记的孕妇是否会在医疗机构分娩。我们使用登记访视期间收集的信息,包括人口统计学数据、健康特征和当前妊娠信息。我们应用四种机器学习方法:逻辑回归、LASSO正则化逻辑回归、随机森林和人工神经网络;以及三种抽样技术来处理不平衡数据:医疗机构分娩的欠采样、家庭分娩的过采样以及使用SMOTE添加合成家庭分娩数据。

结果

我们的模型正确预测了测试集中68%-77%妇女的分娩地点,预测医疗机构分娩的准确率略高于家庭分娩。通过对现有医疗机构分娩数据进行欠采样创建的平衡训练集的随机森林模型准确识别了74.4%在家分娩的妇女。

结论

该模型可以对新参与孕产妇健康项目的人员的分娩地点进行“实时”预测,并可能为有不在医疗机构分娩风险的个人提前提供额外支持,这有可能改善母亲及其新生儿的健康状况。这里提出的框架适用于其他情况,输入特征的选择可以很容易地调整以匹配数据可用性和其他结果,无论是在孕产妇健康领域内还是之外。

相似文献

1
Machine learning for maternal health: Predicting delivery location in a community health worker program in Zanzibar.用于孕产妇健康的机器学习:预测桑给巴尔社区卫生工作者项目中的分娩地点。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;4:855236. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.855236. eCollection 2022.
2
Identifying Programmatic Factors that Increase Likelihood of Health Facility Delivery: Results from a Community Health Worker Program in Zanzibar.确定增加医疗机构分娩可能性的方案因素:桑给巴尔社区卫生工作者方案的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Sep;26(9):1840-1853. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03432-3. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
3
Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.预测桑给巴尔基于医疗机构的分娩情况:机器学习算法对抗击性攻击的脆弱性。
Heliyon. 2023 May 13;9(5):e16244. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16244. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Are populations of postpartum women differentially served by community health worker programs: an observational cohort study from Zanzibar, Tanzania.社区卫生工作者项目对产后妇女群体的服务是否存在差异:来自坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔的观察性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06356-8.
5
Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar.估计胎龄的误差降低了在医疗机构分娩的可能性:来自桑给巴尔的一项观察性队列研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4904-5.
6
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
7
Should I stay or should I go?: consistency and switching of delivery locations among new mothers in 39 Sub-Saharan African and South/Southeast Asian countries.我该留下还是离开?:39 个撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚/东南亚国家新妈妈的分娩地点的一致性和转换。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(9):1294-1308. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx087.
8
Prediction of low Apgar score at five minutes following labor induction intervention in vaginal deliveries: machine learning approach for imbalanced data at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania.坦桑尼亚北部一家三级医院分娩时行引产干预后 5 分钟低 Apgar 评分的预测:不平衡数据的机器学习方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04534-0.
9
Effect of maternal education on choice of location for delivery among Indian women.母亲教育程度对印度女性分娩地点选择的影响。
Natl Med J India. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):328-34.
10
Improving health facility delivery rates in Zanzibar, Tanzania through a large-scale digital community health volunteer programme: a process evaluation.通过大规模数字化社区卫生志愿者计划提高坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔的卫生机构分娩率:过程评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Feb 16;35(10):1-11. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa068.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting place of delivery choice among childbearing women in East Africa: a comparative analysis of advanced machine learning techniques.预测东非育龄妇女的分娩地点选择:先进机器学习技术的比较分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1439320. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439320. eCollection 2024.
2
The use and potential impact of digital health tools at the community level: results from a multi-country survey of community health workers.数字健康工具在社区层面的使用及其潜在影响:来自社区卫生工作者多国家调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18062-3.
3
The Journey of Zanzibar's Digitally Enabled Community Health Program to National Scale: Implementation Report.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.机器学习指导南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区新生儿筛查代谢组学数据的产后胎龄评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04067-y.
2
Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings.移动设备决策支持工具改善基层医疗服务质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 27;7(7):CD012944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2.
3
Identifying Factors Associated with Neonatal Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa using Machine Learning.
桑给巴尔数字化社区健康项目迈向全国规模的历程:实施报告
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Oct 9;11:e48097. doi: 10.2196/48097.
4
Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.预测桑给巴尔基于医疗机构的分娩情况:机器学习算法对抗击性攻击的脆弱性。
Heliyon. 2023 May 13;9(5):e16244. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16244. eCollection 2023 May.
5
A Semi-Supervised Machine Learning Approach in Predicting High-Risk Pregnancies in the Philippines.一种用于预测菲律宾高危妊娠的半监督机器学习方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;12(11):2782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112782.
使用机器学习识别撒哈拉以南非洲地区与新生儿死亡率相关的因素。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:963-972. eCollection 2020.
4
Data-Driven Modeling of Pregnancy-Related Complications.基于数据的妊娠并发症建模。
Trends Mol Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):762-776. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Prevalence and determinants of the place of delivery among reproductive age women in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区育龄妇女分娩地点的患病率及决定因素
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244875. eCollection 2020.
6
Improving health facility delivery rates in Zanzibar, Tanzania through a large-scale digital community health volunteer programme: a process evaluation.通过大规模数字化社区卫生志愿者计划提高坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔的卫生机构分娩率:过程评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Feb 16;35(10):1-11. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa068.
7
Predictive Modeling for Perinatal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings.资源有限环境下的围产儿死亡率预测模型
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2026750. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26750.
8
Prediction of perinatal death using machine learning models: a birth registry-based cohort study in northern Tanzania.使用机器学习模型预测围产期死亡:坦桑尼亚北部一项基于出生登记的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e040132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040132.
9
A Machine Learning-Based Triage Tool for Children With Acute Infection in a Low Resource Setting.基于机器学习的资源匮乏环境下急性感染儿童分诊工具
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):e524-e530. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002121.
10
Predicting skilled delivery service use in Ethiopia: dual application of logistic regression and machine learning algorithms.预测埃塞俄比亚熟练分娩服务的使用:逻辑回归和机器学习算法的双重应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0942-5.