Mueller Stefan, Reiners Christiane S
Institute of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022 Aug 27:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00374-8.
With regard to current controversial public discussions about the credibility of scientific knowledge, it seems particularly important that students possess adequate ideas about the tentativeness of scientific knowledge, which is a key aspect of nature of science. However, international studies show that many pre-service science teachers tend to have naïve conceptions about the tentativeness and these conceptions turn out to be resistant to change. So far, no research was done, on the conceptions of German pre-service chemistry teachers about tentativeness. Therefore, two empirical, qualitative research studies were conducted. The first study with 50 participants was to investigate, which conceptions about tentativeness German pre-service chemistry teachers possess, what the origins of these conceptions are and if they are resistant to change. In a second study with 56 participants, it was examined how a more adequate and functional understanding could be promoted. Data were collected by using different methods, such as open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The participants' views about tentativeness were assigned to different categories. Results show that most participants held inconsistent or only partially informed views on tentativeness. The views turn out to be resistant to change, and many participants are not able to explain their ideas. And if so, their explanations are mostly restricted to scientific theories. Additionally, dealing with tentativeness unsettles some participants. To promote an adequate understanding, new approaches were developed, like the BlackTube activity. Additionally, instructions should focus on the durability of scientific knowledge. Furthermore, a differentiated reflection on different types of scientific knowledge seems necessary.
关于当前公众对科学知识可信度的争议性讨论,学生对科学知识的试探性有充分的认识显得尤为重要,而这是科学本质的一个关键方面。然而,国际研究表明,许多职前科学教师往往对试探性持有天真的观念,而且这些观念难以改变。到目前为止,尚未有关于德国职前化学教师对试探性观念的研究。因此,开展了两项实证性的定性研究。第一项研究有50名参与者,旨在调查德国职前化学教师对试探性持有哪些观念,这些观念的来源是什么,以及它们是否难以改变。在第二项有56名参与者的研究中,考察了如何促进更充分且实用的理解。通过使用开放式问卷和半结构化访谈等不同方法收集数据。参与者对试探性的观点被归类到不同类别。结果表明,大多数参与者对试探性持有不一致或仅部分了解的观点。这些观点难以改变,许多参与者无法解释他们的想法。即便能解释,大多也仅限于科学理论。此外,应对试探性让一些参与者感到不安。为促进充分理解,开发了新方法,如“黑管活动”。此外,教学应关注科学知识的持久性。再者,对不同类型的科学知识进行差异化反思似乎很有必要。