• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟腱垫在 2 型糖尿病患者与非 2 型糖尿病患者之间的材料特性比较:行走期间的研究

Comparison of material properties of heel pad between adults with and without type 2 diabetes history: An investigation during gait.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 17;13:894383. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.894383. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.894383
PMID:36060939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9428762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to compare the material properties of heel pad between diabetes patients and healthy adults, and investigate the impact of compressive loading history and length of diabetes course on the material properties of heel pad.

METHODS

The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and dynamic foot-ground contact pressure-test plate were used for measuring the material properties, including primary thickness, peak strain, peak stress, stiffness, viscous modulus and energy dissipation ratio (EDR), both at time zero and following continuous loading. Material properties between healthy adults and DM patients were compared both at time zero and following continuous weight bearing. After then, comparison between time-zero material properties and properties following continuous loading was performed to identify the loading history-dependent biomechanical behaviour of heel pad. Subgroup-based sensitivity analysis was then conducted to investigate the diabetes course (<10 years vs. ≥10 years) on the material properties of heel pad.

RESULTS

Ten type II DM subjects (20 legs), aged from 59 to 73 (average: 67.8 ± 4.9), and 10 age-matched healthy adults (20 legs), aged from 59 to 72 (average: 64.4 ± 3.4), were enrolled. Diabetes history was demonstrated to be associated with significantly lower primary thickness (t=3.18, p=0.003**), higher peak strain (t=2.41, p=0.021*), lower stiffness (w=283, p=0.024*) and lower viscous modulus (w=331, p<0.001***) at time zero, and significantly lower primary thickness (t=3.30, p=0.002**), higher peak strain (w=120, p=0.031*) and lower viscous modulus (t=3.42, p=0.002**) following continuous loading. The continuous loading was found to be associated with significantly lower primary thickness (paired-w=204, p<0.001***) and viscous modulus (paired-t=5.45, p<0.001***) in healthy adults, and significantly lower primary thickness (paired-w=206, p<0.001***) and viscous modulus (paired-t=7.47, p<0.001***) in diabetes group. No any significant difference was found when conducting the subgroup analysis based on length of diabetes course (<10 years vs. ≥10 years), but the regression analysis showed that the length of diabetes history was positively associated with the peak strain, at time zero (r=0.506, p<0.050) and following continuous loading (r=0.584, p<0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes patients were found to be associated with decreased primary thickness and viscous modulus, and increased peak strain, which may contribute to the vulnerability of heel pad to injury and ulceration. Pre-compression history-dependent behaviour is observable in soft tissue of heel pad, with lowered primary thickness and viscous modulus.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较糖尿病患者与健康成年人足跟垫的材料特性,并探讨压缩加载史和糖尿病病程对足跟垫材料特性的影响。

方法

采用双荧光透视成像系统(DFIS)和动态足底接触压力测试板测量材料特性,包括初始厚度、峰值应变、峰值应力、刚度、粘性模量和能量耗散比(EDR),在零时刻和连续加载后进行测量。比较健康成年人和 DM 患者在零时刻和连续负重后的材料特性。然后,比较零时刻的材料特性和连续加载后的材料特性,以确定足跟垫的加载历史依赖性生物力学行为。然后进行基于亚组的敏感性分析,以研究糖尿病病程(<10 年与≥10 年)对足跟垫材料特性的影响。

结果

纳入了 10 名 2 型 DM 患者(20 条腿),年龄 59 至 73 岁(平均 67.8±4.9),和 10 名年龄匹配的健康成年人(20 条腿),年龄 59 至 72 岁(平均 64.4±3.4)。结果表明,糖尿病病史与初始厚度降低(t=3.18,p=0.003**)、峰值应变升高(t=2.41,p=0.021*)、刚度降低(w=283,p=0.024*)和粘性模量降低(w=331,p<0.001**)有关,在零时刻;而在连续加载后,初始厚度降低(t=3.30,p=0.002**)、峰值应变升高(w=120,p=0.031*)和粘性模量降低(t=3.42,p=0.002**)更为明显。连续加载与健康成年人的初始厚度降低(配对-w=204,p<0.001**)和粘性模量降低(配对-t=5.45,p<0.001**)有关,与糖尿病组的初始厚度降低(配对-w=206,p<0.001**)和粘性模量降低(配对-t=7.47,p<0.001**)有关。但基于糖尿病病程的亚组分析(<10 年与≥10 年)并未发现任何显著差异,但回归分析表明,糖尿病病史与峰值应变呈正相关,无论是在零时刻(r=0.506,p<0.050)还是在连续加载后(r=0.584,p<0.010)。

结论

糖尿病患者的足跟垫存在初始厚度和粘性模量降低,峰值应变升高的情况,这可能导致足跟垫更容易受伤和溃疡。足跟垫的软组织存在预压缩历史依赖性行为,表现为初始厚度和粘性模量降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/53c6dc65dcd5/fendo-13-894383-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/a2aebd27c617/fendo-13-894383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/d1ac693ac8fe/fendo-13-894383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/adc92bf23ca6/fendo-13-894383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/851205d56096/fendo-13-894383-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/161707662bb8/fendo-13-894383-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/a206dc690358/fendo-13-894383-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/53c6dc65dcd5/fendo-13-894383-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/a2aebd27c617/fendo-13-894383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/d1ac693ac8fe/fendo-13-894383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/adc92bf23ca6/fendo-13-894383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/851205d56096/fendo-13-894383-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/161707662bb8/fendo-13-894383-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/a206dc690358/fendo-13-894383-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8934/9428762/53c6dc65dcd5/fendo-13-894383-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of material properties of heel pad between adults with and without type 2 diabetes history: An investigation during gait.跟腱垫在 2 型糖尿病患者与非 2 型糖尿病患者之间的材料特性比较:行走期间的研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 17;13:894383. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.894383. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of loading history on material properties of human heel pad: an in-vivo pilot investigation during gait.加载历史对人脚跟垫材料性能的影响:步态中的体内初步研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 15;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05197-w.
3
Bulk compressive properties of the heel fat pad during walking: a pilot investigation in plantar heel pain.行走过程中足跟脂肪垫的整体压缩特性:一项关于足底足跟痛的初步研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 May;24(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 15.
4
Altered heel-pad mechanical properties in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者足跟垫力学性能的改变
Diabet Med. 2000 Dec;17(12):854-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00394.x.
5
Biomechanics of the heel pad for type 2 diabetic patients.2型糖尿病患者足跟垫的生物力学
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2002 May;17(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00018-9.
6
A clinically applicable non-invasive method to quantitatively assess the visco-hyperelastic properties of human heel pad, implications for assessing the risk of mechanical trauma.一种临床上可应用的非侵入性方法,用于定量评估人足跟垫的粘弹性超弹性特性,对评估机械性创伤风险具有重要意义。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Apr;68:287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
Estimating the material properties of heel pad sub-layers using inverse Finite Element Analysis.使用逆向有限元分析估算足跟垫子层的材料特性。
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Feb;40:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
8
Variations in heel pad mechanical properties variation between children and young adults.儿童和年轻人之间足跟垫力学性能存在差异。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1998 Dec;97(12):850-4.
9
Force-deformation properties of the human heel pad during barefoot walking.人在赤足行走时足跟垫的力-变形特性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Aug;46(8):1588-94. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000281.
10
In vivo biomechanical behavior of the human heel pad during the stance phase of gait.人类足跟垫在步态站立期的体内生物力学行为。
J Biomech. 2001 Dec;34(12):1661-5. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00143-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Materials and Structures Inspired by Human Heel Pads for Advanced Biomechanical Function.受人类足跟垫启发的用于高级生物力学功能的材料与结构
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;10(5):267. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10050267.
2
Footwear Choice and Locomotor Health Throughout the Life Course: A Critical Review.一生中的鞋类选择与运动健康:一项批判性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;13(5):527. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050527.
3
Advances in Machine Learning-Aided Thermal Imaging for Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of loading history on material properties of human heel pad: an in-vivo pilot investigation during gait.加载历史对人脚跟垫材料性能的影响:步态中的体内初步研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 15;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05197-w.
2
[Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly in China (2022 edition)].《中国老年2型糖尿病防治临床指南(2022年版)》
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):12-50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20211027-00751.
3
The Design of Individual Orthopedic Insoles for the Patients with Diabetic Foot Using Integral Curves to Describe the Plantar Over-Pressure Areas.
机器学习辅助热成像技术在糖尿病足溃疡早期检测中的研究进展:综述
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;14(12):614. doi: 10.3390/bios14120614.
4
Enhanced wet grip with North American river otter paws.北美水獭爪子增强的湿抓握力。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024 Dec;1542(1):638-646. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15263. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
A narrative review of the measurement methods for biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissue in patients with diabetic foot.糖尿病足患者足底软组织生物力学特性测量方法的叙述性综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 29;15:1332032. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1332032. eCollection 2024.
利用整体曲线描述足底过度受压区域为糖尿病足患者设计个体化矫形鞋垫。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Aug 6;2021:9061241. doi: 10.1155/2021/9061241. eCollection 2021.
4
Changes in sub-calcaneal fat pad composition and their association with dynamic plantar foot pressure in people with diabetic neuropathy.跟腱下脂肪垫成分的变化及其与糖尿病周围神经病变患者足底动态压力的关系。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Aug;88:105441. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105441. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Diabetic foot ulcer management in a multidisciplinary foot centre: one-year healing, amputation and mortality rate.多学科足部中心的糖尿病足溃疡管理:一年的愈合、截肢和死亡率。
J Wound Care. 2021 Jun 1;30(Sup6):S34-S41. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup6.S34.
6
Knowledge and practice of diabetic foot care - A scoping review.糖尿病足护理知识与实践 - 范围综述。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):783-793. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Sex differences in heel pad stiffness during in vivo loading and unloading.在体内加载和卸载过程中足跟垫硬度的性别差异。
J Anat. 2020 Sep;237(3):520-528. doi: 10.1111/joa.13207. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
8
A novel simplified biomechanical assessment of the heel pad during foot plantarflexion.一种新型的简化生物力学评估方法,用于评估足跖屈时的足跟垫。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Feb;235(2):197-207. doi: 10.1177/0954411920971069. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Diabetes Status is Associated With Plantar Soft Tissue Stiffness Measured Using Ultrasound Reverberant Shear Wave Elastography Approach.糖尿病状况与使用超声背向散射剪切波弹性成像方法测量的足底软组织僵硬有关。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):478-490. doi: 10.1177/1932296820965259. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
10
A Methodological Assessment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome Clinical Practice Guidelines.糖尿病足综合征临床实践指南的方法学评估。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;60(2):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 Jul 4.