Suppr超能文献

与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗与骨质疏松性骨折风险增加无关:一项全国性队列研究。

SGLT2 inhibitor treatment is not associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures when compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists: A nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 19;13:861422. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.861422. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is associated with an increased fracture risk. It is debated whether sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors influence fracture risk in T2D. We aimed to investigate the risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists when used as add-on therapies to metformin.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using Danish national health registries. Diagnoses were obtained from discharge diagnosis codes (ICD-10 and ICD-8-system) from the Danish National Patient Registry, and all redeemed drug prescriptions were obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry (ATC classification system). Subjects treated with metformin in combination with either SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists were identified and enrolled from 2012 to 2018. Subjects were then propensity-score matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and index date. Major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) were defined as hip, vertebral, humerus, or forearm fractures. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate hazard rate ratios (HR) for MOF, and survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

In total, 27,543 individuals treated with either combination were identified and included. After matching, 18,390 individuals were included in the main analysis (9,190 in each group). Median follow-up times were 355 [interquartile range (IQR) 126-780] and 372 [IQR 136-766] days in the SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist group, respectively. We found a crude HR of 0.77 [95% CI 0.56-1.04] for MOF with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists. In the fully adjusted model, we obtained an unaltered HR of 0.77 [95% CI 0.56-1.05]. Results were similar across subgroup- and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors have no effect on fracture risk when compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists. This is in line with results from previous studies.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病(T2D)与骨折风险增加有关。目前仍存在争议,即钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂是否会影响 T2D 患者的骨折风险。我们旨在研究与胰高血糖素样肽 1(GLP-1)受体激动剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂作为二甲双胍的附加治疗药物时,对主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的风险。

方法

我们使用丹麦国家卫生登记处进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。诊断结果来自丹麦国家患者登记处的出院诊断代码(ICD-10 和 ICD-8 系统),所有已使用的药物处方均来自丹麦国家处方登记处(ATC 分类系统)。从 2012 年至 2018 年,我们确定并招募了接受二甲双胍联合 SGLT2 抑制剂或 GLP-1 受体激动剂治疗的患者。然后,根据年龄、性别和索引日期,按 1:1 的比例进行倾向评分匹配。主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)定义为髋部、椎体、肱骨或前臂骨折。利用 Cox 比例风险模型估计 MOF 的危险率比(HR),并使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计器绘制生存曲线。

结果

总共确定并纳入了 27543 名接受联合治疗的患者。匹配后,共有 18390 名患者纳入主要分析(每组 9190 名)。SGLT2 抑制剂组和 GLP-1 受体激动剂组的中位随访时间分别为 355[四分位距(IQR)126-780]和 372[IQR 136-766]天。我们发现,与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂的 MOF 粗 HR 为 0.77[95%CI 0.56-1.04]。在完全调整的模型中,我们得到的未改变的 HR 为 0.77[95%CI 0.56-1.05]。亚组和敏感性分析结果相似。

结论

这些结果表明,与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂对骨折风险没有影响。这与之前的研究结果一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e8/9437938/bcefc419ab90/fendo-13-861422-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验