Suppr超能文献

GLP-1 受体激动剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂相比的主要骨质疏松性骨折风险:一项丹麦全国队列研究。

The risk of major osteoporotic fractures with GLP-1 receptor agonists when compared to DPP-4 inhibitors: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 10;13:882998. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.882998. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is associated with an increased fracture risk. There is little evidence for the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on fracture risk in T2D. We aimed to investigate the risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) for treatment with GLP-1RA compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) as add-on therapies to metformin.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using Danish national health registries. Diagnoses were obtained from discharge diagnosis codes (ICD-10 and ICD-8-system) from the Danish National Patient Registry, and all redeemed drug prescriptions were obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry (ATC classification system). Subjects treated with metformin in combination with either GLP-1RA or DPP-4i were enrolled from 2007 to 2018. Subjects were propensity-score matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and index date. MOF were defined as hip, vertebral, humerus, or forearm fractures. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate hazard rate ratios (HR) for MOF, and survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. In addition, Aalen's Additive Hazards model was applied to examine additive rather than relative hazard effects while allowing time-varying effects.

RESULTS

In total, 42,816 individuals treated with either combination were identified and included. After matching, 32,266 individuals were included in the main analysis (16,133 in each group). Median follow-up times were 642 days and 529 days in the GLP-1RA and DPP-4i group, respectively. We found a crude HR of 0.89 [0.76-1.05] for MOF with GLP-1RA compared to DPP-4i. In the fully adjusted model, we obtained an unaltered HR of 0.86 [0.73-1.03]. For the case of hip fracture, we found a crude HR of 0.68 [0.49-0.96] and a similar adjusted HR. Fracture risk was lower in the GLP-1RA group when examining higher daily doses of the medications, when allowing follow-up to continue after medication change, and when examining hip fractures, specifically. Additional subgroup- and sensitivity analyses yielded results similar to the main analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our primary analysis, we did not observe a significantly different risk of MOF between treatment with GLP-1RA and DPP-4i. We conclude that GLP-1RA are safe in terms of fracture.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病(T2D)与骨折风险增加有关。GLP-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)对 T2D 患者骨折风险的影响证据很少。我们旨在研究与二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂(DPP-4i)相比,GLP-1RA 作为二甲双胍的附加疗法治疗主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的风险。

方法

我们使用丹麦国家健康登记处进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。诊断结果来自丹麦国家患者登记处的出院诊断代码(ICD-10 和 ICD-8 系统),所有已使用的药物处方均来自丹麦国家处方登记处(ATC 分类系统)。2007 年至 2018 年期间,招募了接受二甲双胍联合 GLP-1RA 或 DPP-4i 治疗的患者。根据年龄、性别和索引日期,对接受治疗的患者进行倾向评分 1:1 匹配。MOF 定义为髋部、椎体、肱骨或前臂骨折。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计 MOF 的危险率比(HR),并使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计器绘制生存曲线。此外,应用 Aalen 的加法风险模型来检查附加而非相对危险效应,同时允许随时间变化的效应。

结果

共确定并纳入了 42816 名接受任何一种联合治疗的患者。匹配后,在主要分析中纳入了 32266 名患者(每组 16133 名)。GLP-1RA 和 DPP-4i 组的中位随访时间分别为 642 天和 529 天。我们发现,与 DPP-4i 相比,GLP-1RA 治疗的 MOF 的粗 HR 为 0.89 [0.76-1.05]。在完全调整的模型中,我们得到了未改变的 HR 为 0.86 [0.73-1.03]。对于髋部骨折,我们发现粗 HR 为 0.68 [0.49-0.96],且调整后的 HR 相似。在检查更高的每日剂量药物、允许药物更改后继续随访以及专门检查髋部骨折时,GLP-1RA 组的骨折风险较低。进一步的亚组和敏感性分析得出的结果与主要分析相似。

结论

在我们的主要分析中,我们没有观察到 GLP-1RA 与 DPP-4i 治疗之间 MOF 风险的显著差异。我们的结论是,GLP-1RA 在骨折方面是安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/005a/9589410/7b561b69e690/fendo-13-882998-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验