• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

闭合性Lisfranc损伤伴脱位的分期手术

Staged surgery for closed Lisfranc injury with dislocation.

作者信息

He Wenbao, Xia Jiang, Zhou Haichao, Li Zhendong, Zhao Youguang, Yang Yunfeng, Li Bing

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Aug 19;9:984669. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.984669. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.984669
PMID:36061041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9437587/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of staged surgery for patients with closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation.

METHODS

This study included 48 patients with acute closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation admitted between July 2016 and July 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. 23 patients in group A underwent staged surgeries included emergency reduction within 4-8 h after injury, and open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc injury and first tarsometatarsal joint fusion after the swelling had subsided. 25 patients in group B underwent open reduction and internal fixation as an elective procedure after the swelling had subsided. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used for assessment at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients with closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation were included. The lengths of hospitalization were 11.52 ± 1.61 day and 19.80 ± 2.37 day in groups A and B, respectively. The total lengths of surgery were 67.34 ± 1.71 min and 104.36 ± 8.31 min in groups A and B, respectively. 48 patients completed the final follow-up (follow-up period range: 12-24 months, mean: 18 months). All fractures had healed at 12-18 weeks after surgery (mean: 14.6 weeks). At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the AOFAS and VAS score was 86.87 ± 4.24 and 1.91 ± 0.78, respectively, during weight-bearing walking in group A patients and 71.72 ± 5.46 and 3.20 ± 1.17 in group B. By the end of the follow-up period, only 2 patients in group B had developed traumatic arthritis and no patients had joint re-dislocation or required secondary surgery.

CONCLUSION

Staged surgery for closed Lisfranc injury with dislocation reduced the incidence of perioperative complications and achieved good surgical outcomes while shortening the lengths of surgery and hospitalization.

摘要

目的

探讨分期手术治疗闭合性Lisfranc损伤脱位患者的临床疗效。

方法

本研究纳入2016年7月至2021年7月收治的48例急性闭合性Lisfranc损伤脱位患者。将患者分为两组。A组23例患者接受分期手术,包括伤后4 - 8小时内急诊复位,肿胀消退后行Lisfranc损伤切开复位内固定及第一跖跗关节融合术。B组25例患者在肿胀消退后择期行切开复位内固定术。末次随访时采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)中足评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行评估。

结果

共纳入48例闭合性Lisfranc损伤脱位患者。A组和B组的住院时间分别为11.52±1.61天和19.80±2.37天。A组和B组的手术总时长分别为67.34±1.71分钟和104.36±8.31分钟。48例患者完成末次随访(随访期范围:12 - 24个月,平均18个月)。所有骨折在术后12 - 18周愈合(平均14.6周)。术后1年随访时,A组患者负重行走时AOFAS评分和VAS评分分别为86.87±4.24和1.91±0.78,B组分别为71.72±5.46和3.20±1.17。随访期末,B组仅2例患者发生创伤性关节炎,无患者出现关节再脱位或需要二次手术。

结论

闭合性Lisfranc损伤脱位分期手术降低了围手术期并发症的发生率,在缩短手术时长和住院时间的同时取得了良好的手术效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/3729ed14ee47/fsurg-09-984669-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/86f8e71a8427/fsurg-09-984669-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/3ba6a46861a7/fsurg-09-984669-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/0eec60eb5681/fsurg-09-984669-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/80589e8b8a10/fsurg-09-984669-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/5e7922f64271/fsurg-09-984669-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/8e68bd01ecab/fsurg-09-984669-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/3729ed14ee47/fsurg-09-984669-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/86f8e71a8427/fsurg-09-984669-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/3ba6a46861a7/fsurg-09-984669-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/0eec60eb5681/fsurg-09-984669-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/80589e8b8a10/fsurg-09-984669-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/5e7922f64271/fsurg-09-984669-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/8e68bd01ecab/fsurg-09-984669-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b58/9437587/3729ed14ee47/fsurg-09-984669-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Staged surgery for closed Lisfranc injury with dislocation.闭合性Lisfranc损伤伴脱位的分期手术
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 19;9:984669. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.984669. eCollection 2022.
2
[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.
3
Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Lisfranc Injury Using Suspensory Fixation.采用悬吊固定法对Lisfranc损伤进行闭合复位及经皮固定
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Mar 17;13(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00066. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
4
Staged Management of Missed Lisfranc Injuries: A Report of Short-term Results.漏诊的跖跗关节损伤的分期治疗:短期结果报告
Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/os.12320.
5
Lisfranc injuries with dislocation the first tarsometatarsal joint: primary arthrodesis or internal fixation (a randomized controlled trial).跖跗关节内脱位的 Lisfranc 损伤:一期融合或内固定(一项随机对照试验)。
Int Orthop. 2022 Nov;46(11):2529-2537. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05478-y. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Staged surgical treatment of open Lisfranc fracture dislocations using an adjustable bilateral external fixator: A retrospective review of 21 patients.使用可调节双侧外固定架分期手术治疗开放性Lisfranc骨折脱位:21例患者的回顾性研究
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):488-496. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19221.
7
[Effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation for acute and delayed occult Lisfranc injuries].切开复位内固定治疗急性和陈旧性隐匿性Lisfranc损伤的疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 15;33(8):965-969. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901004.
8
A mid-term follow-up retrospective evaluation of tarsometatarsal joint fracture-dislocations treated by closed reduction and percutaneous K-wires fixation.跗跖关节骨折脱位经闭合复位经皮 K 线固定的中期随访回顾性评估。
Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1635-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.040. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
[Indirect fixation of the third tarsometatarsal joint for high-energy Lisfranc injury].[间接固定第三跗跖关节治疗高能Lisfranc损伤]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 15;35(4):426-430. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202009066.
10
Comparison of Arthrodesis and Non-fusion to Treat Lisfranc Injuries.关节融合术与非融合术治疗Lisfranc损伤的比较
Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):62-68. doi: 10.1111/os.12316. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term results of staged management of complex lisfranc and chopart injury: a retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review.复杂Lisfranc和Chopart损伤分期治疗的长期结果:一项回顾性队列研究及系统文献综述
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02747-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Arthrodesis in Acute and Chronic Lisfranc's Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急性和慢性 Lisfranc 患者的关节融合术:回顾性队列研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 May-Jun;61(3):471-478. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation in patients with Lisfranc fracture instability (The BFF Study) study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.跟骨骨折不稳定性患者行一期融合与切开复位内固定术的效果和成本效益比较(BFF 研究):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Surg. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01320-1.
3
Factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation.
影响急性跖跗关节骨折脱位手术后残余间室综合征的因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2685-2694. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04058-w. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Temporary Bridge Plating vs Primary Arthrodesis of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint in Lisfranc Injuries: Randomized Controlled Trial.跖跗关节损伤中第一跖楔关节临时桥接钢板固定与一期关节融合术的随机对照试验。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Aug;41(8):901-910. doi: 10.1177/1071100720925815. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
5
Fusion of the Tarsometatarsal Joints: A Focus on Lateral Column Fusion Nonunion Rates.跗跖关节融合术:聚焦于外侧柱融合不愈合率
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jul-Aug;59(4):704-710. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Strategies to minimize soft tissues and septic complications in staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures.分期治疗高能胫骨近端骨折中减少软组织和感染并发症的策略。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):671-680. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02619-9. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
7
Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction internal fixation for complete Lisfranc fracture dislocations: a retrospective study comparing functional and radiological outcomes.一期关节融合术与切开复位内固定术治疗完全性Lisfranc骨折脱位:一项比较功能和影像学结果的回顾性研究
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):585-590. doi: 10.1111/ans.15627. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Internal fixation or primary arthrodesis for Lisfranc complex joint injuries? A meta-analysis of comparative studies.Lisfranc 复合体关节损伤采用内固定或一期融合术治疗?一项比较性研究的荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Aug;47(4):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01236-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of acute lisfranc injuries: Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis.急性Lisfranc损伤治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析:切开复位内固定与一期关节融合术的对比
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Apr;26(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
10
Staged Prone/Supine Fixation of High-Energy Multicolumnar Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Multicenter Analysis.分期俯卧位/仰卧位固定高能多柱胫骨平台骨折:多中心分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Apr;32(4):e117-e122. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001109.