Zangpo Dawa, Iino Morio, Nakatome Masato, Yoshimiya Motoo, Norbu Norbu
Division of Forensic Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Jigme Dorji Wangchuk National Referral Hospital, Thimphu 11001, Bhutan.
Yonago Acta Med. 2022 Aug 1;65(3):191-199. doi: 10.33160/yam.2022.08.006. eCollection 2022 Aug.
This study attempted to discuss the historical context and current practice of forensic medicine in South Asia. Comparisons within and between countries in South Asia, and between South Asia and the developed countries (represented by Japan and the USA) have been made to provide an insight into their distinct practice of forensic medicine. Though the formal establishment of forensic medicine in South Asia commenced at a comparable period to the developed countries, their pace of development has been considerably slow. Moreover, their ways of practice as well have evolved differently. In effect, South Asian countries follow an 'integrated service' system, whilst Japan and the USA practice 'divided service' systems to provide forensic medical services. Similarly, regarding the death investigations, most South Asian countries follow a Police-led death investigation system, whereas Japan and the USA follow a hybrid model and the Medical examiner's system of death investigation, respectively. Indeed, forensic medicine in South Asia is undeniably underdeveloped. In this paper, by highlighting the issues and challenges confronted in South Asia, key actions for prompt redressal are discussed to improve the standard of forensic medical services in South Asia.
本研究试图探讨南亚法医学的历史背景和当前实践。对南亚国家内部和之间,以及南亚与发达国家(以日本和美国为代表)进行了比较,以深入了解它们独特的法医学实践。尽管南亚法医学的正式建立与发达国家始于同一时期,但其发展速度相当缓慢。此外,它们的实践方式也有所不同。实际上,南亚国家采用“综合服务”体系,而日本和美国则实行“分散服务”体系来提供法医服务。同样,在死因调查方面,大多数南亚国家采用警方主导的死因调查系统,而日本和美国分别采用混合模式和法医死因调查系统。事实上,南亚的法医学无疑是不发达的。在本文中,通过突出南亚面临的问题和挑战,讨论了迅速补救的关键行动,以提高南亚法医服务的标准。