Lebovitz Lisa, Daugherty Kimberly K, DiVall Margarita V, Boyce Eric G, Rudolph Michael
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 North Pine Street, PH S303, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
Sullivan University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2100 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY 40205, United States of America.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Aug 13;7:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100169. eCollection 2022 Sep.
US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school rankings are based on a single-question peer perception survey.
The objective of this study was to develop a simple, transparent framework to rank US colleges and schools of pharmacy in overall quality and separately based on program quality and research quality, using data that are readily available to the academy.
Data for three education quality and four research quality metrics were obtained for 2020. Each metric was standardized and ranked, and then each set was summed to determine separate ranks for education and research. Education and research scores were combined using equal weights to provide a single rank for overall quality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of assigning higher proportionate value to education, similar to USNWR medical school rankings.
Distinct ranks were produced for education, research, overall (education: research) 50:50, and overall 60:40. Sensitivity analysis suggests the more disproportionately the education and research factors are weighted, the more ranks change. Mid-ranked schools were most impacted when weightings changed due to relative strength in one factor and relative weakness in the other. When weighted 60:40, nine (7%) mid-ranked programs improved in rank, while 11 (11%) worsened in rank compared to the 50:50 model.
Separately ranking education and research can highlight the diverse strengths of pharmacy schools. The proposed model is based on easily obtainable data and is easily reproducible, allowing for annual rankings. These rankings may be used by PharmD and PhD applicants when selecting schools and by pharmacy schools to benchmark true and aspirational peers.
《美国新闻与世界报道》(USNWR)发布著名的研究生健康项目排名。医学和护理专业通过使用多个标准的加权指标进行排名,医学院则根据其重点(研究或初级保健)进行单独排名。USNWR药学院排名基于单一问题的同行认知调查。
本研究的目的是开发一个简单、透明的框架,使用学院容易获取的数据,对美国药学院在整体质量方面以及分别基于项目质量和研究质量进行排名。
获取了2020年三个教育质量指标和四个研究质量指标的数据。对每个指标进行标准化和排名,然后将每组指标相加,以确定教育和研究的单独排名。教育和研究得分使用相等权重进行合并,以提供整体质量的单一排名。进行了敏感性分析,以确定赋予教育更高比例值的影响,类似于USNWR医学院排名。
得出了教育、研究、整体(教育:研究)50:50以及整体60:40的不同排名。敏感性分析表明,教育和研究因素的权重差异越大,排名变化就越大。当中等排名的学校由于一个因素的相对优势和另一个因素相对劣势导致权重变化时,受到的影响最大。与50:50模型相比,当权重为60:40时,九个(7%)中等排名的项目排名上升,而11个(11%)排名下降。
分别对教育和研究进行排名可以突出药学院的不同优势。所提出的模型基于易于获取的数据且易于重现,可进行年度排名。这些排名可供药学博士和哲学博士申请人在选择学校时使用,也可供药学院用于对标真实和理想的同行。