Vermeeren Laura
Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cult Stud. 2022 Jan 6;36(5):748-769. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2021.2011934. eCollection 2022.
How and where to be creative, and what creativity entails and affords has been subject to momentous change in recent decades in China. Since the early 2000s, the discourse of creativity has played a leading role in governmental policies that aim to boost economic development through a focus on the creative industries. First-tier Chinese cities have reinvented themselves as creative hotbeds with distinctive areas, often located at the fringes of the city, for creative production and practice (Ren and Meng [2012]. Artistic urbanization: creative industries and creative control in Beijing. International journal of urban and regional research, 36 (3), 504-521, Power, capital, and artistic freedom: contemporary Chinese art communities and the city. Cultural studies, 33 (4), 657-689). This article complicates this creative-city script, one that is deeply enmeshed in a global proliferation of the creativity discourse in tandem with Chinese state policies, by examining the practice of water calligraphy. This is an urban ephemeral creative practice that takes place in public parks in the centre of Beijing. Water calligraphy, done by the elderly in Beijing, challenges the idea of creativity as the domain of a young cool urban class, while its ephemerality contests ideas that urban creativity is necessarily forced into structures of commodification and governmentalization. Water calligraphers' adherence to the traditional discourse of calligraphy, despite several creative deviations, further challenges notions of creativity that identify it with novelty. Within the urban landscape, these senior citizens carve out a creative space for themselves outside designated art districts and creative industries clusters. In doing so, they disregard the imperative of the new that is conventionally believed to underpin 'real' creativity, and thus may help us to rethink the idea of creativity itself.
在中国,近几十年来,如何发挥创造力、在何处发挥创造力,以及创造力的内涵和作用都发生了重大变化。自21世纪初以来,创造力话语在旨在通过关注创意产业来促进经济发展的政府政策中发挥了主导作用。中国的一线城市将自己重塑为创意温床,拥有独特的区域,这些区域通常位于城市边缘,用于创意生产和实践(任和孟[2012年]。艺术城市化:北京的创意产业与创意控制。《国际城市与区域研究杂志》,36(3),504 - 521;权力、资本与艺术自由:当代中国艺术社区与城市。《文化研究》,33(4),657 - 689)。本文通过审视水书这一实践,使这一与全球创造力话语扩散以及中国国家政策紧密相连的创意城市脚本变得复杂。水书是一种在北京中心城区公园中进行的城市短暂创意实践。由北京老年人进行的水书,挑战了创造力是年轻时尚城市阶层专属领域的观念,而其短暂性则对城市创造力必然被纳入商品化和政府化结构的观点提出了质疑。尽管存在一些创造性的偏离,水书书写者对传统书法话语的坚持,进一步挑战了将创造力等同于新颖性的观念。在城市景观中,这些老年人在指定艺术区和创意产业集群之外为自己开辟了一个创意空间。这样做时,他们无视了传统上被认为支撑“真正”创造力的求新要求,因此可能有助于我们重新思考创造力本身的概念。