Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗中国高血压的成本-效用分析:基于随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of hypertension in China: A cost-utility analysis based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;10:959139. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959139. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril-valsartan was recommended for heart failure (HF) and proven cost-effective in HF. Recently, sacubitril-valsartan has been recommended to treat hypertension by the Chinese expert consensus. The cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan for hypertension remains uninvestigated.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to investigate the real efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan on blood pressure, compared with angiotensin receptor blockers or placebo. A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), representing the ratio of incremental costs to the incremental utility. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was three times of per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in China in 2021. Sacubitril-valsartan was considered cost-effective if the ICUR obtained was lower than the WTP threshold, otherwise, sacubitril-valsartanis was not cost-effective.

RESULTS

A total of 10 RCTs of 5,781 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For comparison of sacubitril-valsartan 400 mg/day vs. valsartan 320 mg/day, a reduction in blood pressure (BP) of -5.97 (-6.38, -5.56) ( < 0.01) was observed. Cost-utility analysis showed that for a 60-year-old patient with hypertension, if sacubitril-valsartan was prescribed as the antihypertensive agent, he had a life expectancy of 11.91 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with costs of 65,066 CNY, and if valsartan was prescribed as the antihypertensive agent, the life expectancy would be 11.82 QALY with costs of 54,769 CNY; thus, an ICUR of 108,622 CNY/QALY was obtained, lower than the WTP threshold.

CONCLUSION

Compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan is more effective in reducing blood pressure and may result in more quality-adjusted life-year, although with higher costs. Sacubitril-valsartan is cost-effective for hypertension in the current China setting under the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times of per capita GDP.

摘要

背景

沙库巴曲缬沙坦已被推荐用于心力衰竭(HF)治疗,并已被证明具有成本效益。最近,中国专家共识建议将沙库巴曲缬沙坦用于治疗高血压。然而,沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗高血压的成本效益仍有待研究。

方法

我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以评估沙库巴曲缬沙坦在降低血压方面的真实疗效,并与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或安慰剂进行比较。我们构建了一个终生马尔可夫模型,以比较沙库巴曲缬沙坦与缬沙坦的成本效益。主要结局指标是增量成本效用比(ICUR),表示增量成本与增量效用的比值。意愿支付(WTP)阈值为 2021 年中国人均国内生产总值(GDP)的三倍。如果获得的 ICUR 低于 WTP 阈值,则认为沙库巴曲缬沙坦具有成本效益,否则认为沙库巴曲缬沙坦不具有成本效益。

结果

共有 10 项 RCT 纳入了 5781 名患者。与缬沙坦 320mg/d 相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦 400mg/d 可使血压降低-5.97(-6.38,-5.56)(<0.01)。成本效用分析显示,对于一名 60 岁的高血压患者,如果处方沙库巴曲缬沙坦作为降压药,其预期寿命为 11.91 个质量调整生命年(QALY),成本为 65066 元人民币;如果处方缬沙坦作为降压药,预期寿命为 11.82 QALY,成本为 54769 元人民币;因此,ICUR 为 108622 元人民币/QALY,低于 WTP 阈值。

结论

与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在降低血压方面更有效,尽管成本更高,但可能带来更多的质量调整生命年。在中国当前的支付意愿阈值下,沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗高血压具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc94/9432800/d86afc33f648/fpubh-10-959139-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验