• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中国农村社区高血压控制项目(CRHCP)研究的非医师主导的农村社区血压干预措施的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a nonphysician-led, community-based blood pressure intervention in rural China based on CRHCP research.

作者信息

Li Qiaoqiao, Xu Teng, Hu Tianyang, Lou Yake

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Precision Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Dec 9;40(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000461.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000461
PMID:39651579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703623/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP) is a nonphysician-led community-based hypertension intervention program that has demonstrated clear benefits in improving blood pressure (BP) control and reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events among hypertensive patients in rural areas of China. However, it is currently unclear whether the benefits of the CRHCP outweigh its costs, and whether promoting this project in China is justifiable from a perspective of healthcare system.

METHODS

We employed a Markov model to forecast the anticipated 20-year costs and effectiveness of the CRHCP trial. Cost data for this study was gathered from public records or published papers, whereas clinical data was extracted from the CRHCP trial. Our primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, expressed in Chinese Yuan (CNY) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), representing the additional cost per additional QALY gained.

RESULTS

Over a span of 20 years, the cost for a rural hypertensive individual in China who received intensive BP intervention by a nonphysician community healthcare provider would amount to 25,129 CNY, yielding an effectiveness of 8.19 QALY. In contrast, if usual care was provided, the cost would be 26,709 CNY with an effectiveness of 7.94 QALY. The CRHCP program demonstrated lower costs and greater effectiveness for rural hypertensive individuals in China.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the implementation of the CRHCP program among rural hypertensive individuals in China resulted in increased effectiveness and reduced costs. From the perspective of Chinese healthcare system, the CRHCP program proves to be cost-saving within the current healthcare landscape.

摘要

背景

中国农村高血压控制项目(CRHCP)是一项由非医生主导的基于社区的高血压干预项目,已在中国农村地区的高血压患者中显示出在改善血压(BP)控制和降低心血管疾病事件发生率方面的明显益处。然而,目前尚不清楚CRHCP的益处是否超过其成本,以及从医疗保健系统的角度来看在中国推广该项目是否合理。

方法

我们采用马尔可夫模型来预测CRHCP试验预期的20年成本和效果。本研究的成本数据来自公共记录或已发表的论文,而临床数据则从CRHCP试验中提取。我们的主要结局指标是增量成本效益比,以每质量调整生命年(QALY)的人民币(CNY)表示,代表每获得一个额外的QALY所增加的成本。

结果

在20年的时间里,在中国接受非医生社区医疗服务提供者强化血压干预的农村高血压患者的成本将达到25,129元人民币,产生8.19个QALY的效果。相比之下,如果提供常规护理,成本将为26,709元人民币,效果为7.94个QALY。CRHCP项目在中国农村高血压患者中显示出更低的成本和更高的效果。

结论

我们的研究表明,在中国农村高血压患者中实施CRHCP项目可提高效果并降低成本。从中国医疗保健系统的角度来看,CRHCP项目在当前医疗保健格局下被证明是节省成本的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/0695e924ec88/S0266462324000461_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/790f18073f45/S0266462324000461_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/56dcededb449/S0266462324000461_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/0695e924ec88/S0266462324000461_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/790f18073f45/S0266462324000461_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/56dcededb449/S0266462324000461_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621f/11703623/0695e924ec88/S0266462324000461_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a nonphysician-led, community-based blood pressure intervention in rural China based on CRHCP research.基于中国农村社区高血压控制项目(CRHCP)研究的非医师主导的农村社区血压干预措施的成本效益分析
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Dec 9;40(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000461.
2
Influenza vaccination for heart failure patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.心力衰竭患者的流感疫苗接种:中国医疗体系视角下的成本效益分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1348207. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348207. eCollection 2024.
3
The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study.中国低成本基本降压药物控制高血压的成本效益:一项建模研究
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 4;12(8):e1001860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860. eCollection 2015 Aug.
4
The economic impact associated with stent retriever selection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis of MASTRO I data from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓术选择治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的经济影响:基于中国医疗体系视角下 MASTRO I 数据的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e240160. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0160. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
5
Cost-Utility Analysis of the Integrated Care Models for the Management of Hypertension Patients: A Quasi-Experiment in Southwest Rural China.中国西南农村地区高血压患者管理的综合护理模式的成本效用分析:一项准实验研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;9:727829. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.727829. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of baseline cardiovascular risk on the outcomes of intensive blood pressure intervention: a post hoc analysis of the China rural hypertension control project.强化血压干预对心血管基线风险的影响:中国农村高血压控制项目的事后分析。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 20;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03494-w.
7
[Cost-effective analysis of seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly Chinese population].[中国老年人群季节性流感疫苗的成本效益分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 6;53(10):993-999. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.10.008.
8
Rationale and Design of a Cluster Randomized Trial of a Village Doctor-Led Intervention on Hypertension Control in China.中国村医主导的高血压控制干预措施的一项集群随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Aug 9;34(8):831-839. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab038.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control Among Older Patients With Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化降压与标准降压的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0708.
10
Multifaceted Intensive Blood Pressure Control Model in Older and Younger Individuals With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.多维度强化血压控制模式在老年和年轻高血压患者中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;9(9):781-790. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1449.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial.非医师社区卫生保健提供者主导的强化血压干预与常规护理对心血管疾病的效果(CRHCP):一项开放标签、盲终点、群组随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):928-938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02603-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control Among Older Patients With Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化降压与标准降压的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0708.
3
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China, 2004-18: findings from six rounds of a national survey.
2004-2018 年中国高血压的流行、知晓、治疗和控制情况:来自六轮全国调查的结果。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 11;380:e071952. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071952.
4
Hypertension in an Emergency Department Population in Moshi, Tanzania; A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Hypertension Control.坦桑尼亚莫希急诊人群中的高血压;高血压控制障碍的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0279377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279377. eCollection 2023.
5
Economic evaluation of new blood pressure target for hypertensive patients in Taiwan according to the 2022 hypertension clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan society of cardiology: a simulation modeling study.根据台湾心脏病学会2022年高血压临床实践指南对台湾高血压患者新血压目标的经济学评估:一项模拟建模研究
Hypertens Res. 2023 Jan;46(1):187-199. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01037-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Treatment in Older Patients With Hypertension in China.中国老年高血压患者强化降压与标准降压治疗的成本效果分析。
Hypertension. 2022 Nov;79(11):2631-2641. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20051. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of hypertension in China: A cost-utility analysis based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗中国高血压的成本-效用分析:基于随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;10:959139. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959139. eCollection 2022.
8
Urban-Rural Difference in Treatment Adherence of Chinese Hypertensive Patients.中国高血压患者治疗依从性的城乡差异
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 15;16:2125-2133. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S377203. eCollection 2022.
9
Village doctors managing hypertension in rural China.中国农村地区管理高血压的乡村医生。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1922-1923. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00424-X. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
10
A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial.农村中国以乡村医生为基础的多方面血压控制干预措施:一项开放、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1964-1975. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00325-7. Epub 2022 Apr 29.