Department of Health Behavior and Social Medicine, West China School of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Operation Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;10:953881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953881. eCollection 2022.
Proper management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is a severe challenge to China's rural health system. This study investigates what influences the poor medical treatment of NCDs (diabetes and angina) by evaluating the "know-do gap" between provider knowledge and practice. To determine whether low levels of provider knowledge low quality of patient care is the primary constraint on the quality of NCDs diagnosis and treatment in rural China. Providers from Village Clinics (VC) and Township Health Centers (THC), and Standardized Patients (SP) were selected by a multi-stage random sampling method. Clinical vignettes were administered to 306 providers from 103 VCs and 50 THCs in rural Sichuan Province. SPs presented diabetes symptoms completed 97 interactions with providers in 46 VCs and 51 THCs; SPs presented angina symptoms completed 100 interactions with providers in 50 VCs and 50 THCs. Process quality, diagnosis quality, and treatment quality were assessed against national standards for diabetes and angina. Two-tailed -tests and tests of proportions for continuous outcomes and tests of proportions for binary dependent variables were used to compare vignette and SP results. Differences between vignette and SP data calculated the know-do gap. Regression analyses were used to examine the providers/facility characteristics and knowledge/practice associations. THC providers demonstrated significantly more knowledge in vignettes and better practices in SP visits than VC providers. However, levels of knowledge were low overall: 48.2% of THC providers and 28.2% of VC providers properly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, while 23.8% of THC providers and 14.7% of VC providers properly diagnosed angina. With SPs, 2.1% of THC providers and 6.8% of VC providers correctly diagnosed type 2 diabetes; 25.5% of THC providers and 12.8% of VC providers correctly diagnosed angina. There were significant know-do gaps in diagnosis process quality, diagnosis quality, and treatment quality for diabetes ( < 0.01), and in diagnosis process quality ( < 0.05) and treatment quality for angina ( < 0.01). Providers in rural China display low levels of knowledge when treating diabetes and angina. Despite low knowledge, evidence of the know-do gap indicates that low-quality healthcare is the primary constraint on the quality of NCD diagnosis and treatment in rural China. Our research findings provide a new perspective for the evaluation of the medical quality and a technical basis for the development of new standardized cases in the future.
慢性病(NCDs)的有效管理是中国农村卫生系统面临的严峻挑战。本研究通过评估提供者知识与实践之间的“知-行差距”,探讨了影响 NCDs(糖尿病和心绞痛)治疗效果不佳的因素。目的是确定提供者知识水平低是否是中国农村 NCD 诊断和治疗质量的主要制约因素。本研究采用多阶段随机抽样方法,选取了乡村诊所(VC)和乡镇卫生院(THC)的提供者和标准化患者(SP)。临床病例在四川省农村地区的 103 个 VC 和 50 个 THC 中,对 306 名提供者进行了评估。SP 呈现出糖尿病症状,与 46 个 VC 和 51 个 THC 中的提供者进行了 97 次互动;SP 呈现出心绞痛症状,与 50 个 VC 和 50 个 THC 中的提供者进行了 100 次互动。根据糖尿病和心绞痛的国家标准,评估了过程质量、诊断质量和治疗质量。对于连续结果使用双侧 t 检验和比例检验,对于二项依赖变量使用比例检验,比较了案例和 SP 的结果。计算了案例和 SP 数据之间的知-行差距。回归分析用于检验提供者/医疗机构特征与知识/实践的相关性。与 VC 提供者相比,THC 提供者在案例中表现出更多的知识,在 SP 访问中表现出更好的实践。然而,总体而言,知识水平较低:48.2%的 THC 提供者和 28.2%的 VC 提供者正确诊断出 2 型糖尿病,而 23.8%的 THC 提供者和 14.7%的 VC 提供者正确诊断出心绞痛。在 SP 中,2.1%的 THC 提供者和 6.8%的 VC 提供者正确诊断出 2 型糖尿病;25.5%的 THC 提供者和 12.8%的 VC 提供者正确诊断出心绞痛。糖尿病的诊断过程质量、诊断质量和治疗质量存在显著的知-行差距(<0.01),而心绞痛的诊断过程质量(<0.05)和治疗质量也存在显著的知-行差距(<0.01)。中国农村的提供者在治疗糖尿病和心绞痛时表现出较低的知识水平。尽管知识水平较低,但知-行差距的证据表明,低质量的医疗保健是中国农村 NCD 诊断和治疗质量的主要制约因素。我们的研究结果为评估医疗质量提供了一个新视角,并为未来开发新的标准化病例提供了技术基础。