• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简要报告:功能性活动问卷项目偏差评估。

Brief Report: An Evaluation of Item Bias on the Functional Activities Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb 18;38(2):276-282. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac071.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac071
PMID:36062452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365831/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), a commonly used measure of functional status in neurodegenerative disease research, performs equivalently across demographically diverse subgroups of participants.

METHOD

The FAQs from 30,613 National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center participants were evaluated with a hybrid graded response model-logistic ordinal regression approach to determine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) within five demographic groups: education, ethnicity, race, language, and sex.

RESULTS

Measurable DIF was observed for FAQ items in all groups; however, measures of effect size, latent trait distributions, and item characteristic curves suggested that the impact was minimal for research and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAQ is able to provide minimally biased assessments of daily functioning across diverse participants, suggesting potential value for offsetting disparities in diagnosis and treatment.

摘要

目的

评估常用于神经退行性疾病研究的功能活动问卷(FAQ)在参与者的不同人口统计学亚组中是否具有等效性。

方法

使用混合等级反应模型-逻辑有序回归方法评估了来自 30613 名国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心参与者的 FAQ,以确定五个人口统计学群体(教育程度、种族、民族、语言和性别)内是否存在差异项目功能(DIF)。

结果

在所有群体中都观察到 FAQ 项目存在可衡量的 DIF;但是,效应大小、潜在特质分布和项目特征曲线的测量表明,这种影响在研究和实践中是微不足道的。

结论

FAQ 能够为不同参与者提供最小偏差的日常功能评估,这表明它可能有助于抵消诊断和治疗方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Brief Report: An Evaluation of Item Bias on the Functional Activities Questionnaire.简要报告:功能性活动问卷项目偏差评估。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb 18;38(2):276-282. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac071.
2
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Its Reliability and Validity.功能活动问卷(FAQ)的综合评估及其信度和效度。
Assessment. 2022 Jun;29(4):748-763. doi: 10.1177/1073191121991215. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.用于检测项目功能差异的现代心理测量方法:在认知评估测量中的应用。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1651-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1651::aid-sim453>3.0.co;2-h.
4
A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning.一个包含37个项目的肩部功能状态项目库的项目功能差异可忽略不计。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.007. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
5
Examination of the Measurement Equivalence of the Functional Assessment in Acute Care MCAT (FAMCAT) Mobility Item Bank Using Differential Item Functioning Analyses.使用差异项目功能分析检验急性护理 MCAT(FAMCAT)移动项目库中功能评估的测量等效性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5S):S84-S107.e38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar.使用有序逻辑回归技术进行项目功能差异分析。DIFdetect和difwithpar。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S115-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed.
7
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form Items: Application to Ethnically Diverse Cancer and Palliative Care Populations.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰简表条目的测量等效性:在不同种族癌症和姑息治疗人群中的应用。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):309-352.
8
Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷修订版中的项目功能差异影响
Qual Life Res. 2007 Aug;16(6):981-90. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9200-x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
9
Differential item functioning of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in a rural, multi-ethnic cohort.贝克焦虑量表在农村多民族队列中的差异项目功能。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
10
Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.使用项目反应理论对数似然比(IRTLR)方法评估测量等价性,以评估项目功能差异(DIF):身体功能能力和一般痛苦测量的应用(附说明)
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:43-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9186-4. Epub 2007 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive dispersion and its functional relevance in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and prodromal behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.认知弥散及其在行为变异型额颞叶痴呆和前驱行为变异型额颞叶痴呆中的功能相关性。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Oct;38(7):637-652. doi: 10.1037/neu0000969. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Do we all do the same things? Applicability of daily activities at the intersection of demographics.我们都做同样的事情吗?人口统计学交叉点的日常活动的适用性。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Jul;38(5):379-391. doi: 10.1037/neu0000956. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Regional cerebral tau predicts decline in everyday functioning across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.区域性大脑 tau 可预测阿尔茨海默病谱中日常功能的下降。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Jul 5;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01267-w.
4
Ecological validity of cognitive fluctuations in dementia with Lewy bodies.路易体痴呆认知波动的生态效度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Jan;30(1):35-46. doi: 10.1017/S1355617723000255. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive screening with functional assessment improves diagnostic accuracy and attenuates bias.通过功能评估进行认知筛查可提高诊断准确性并减少偏差。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Dec 8;13(1):e12250. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12250. eCollection 2021.
2
2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2021 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Mar;17(3):327-406. doi: 10.1002/alz.12328. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Its Reliability and Validity.功能活动问卷(FAQ)的综合评估及其信度和效度。
Assessment. 2022 Jun;29(4):748-763. doi: 10.1177/1073191121991215. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
4
Association between enrollment factors and incident cognitive impairment in Blacks and Whites: Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Center.黑人和白人登记因素与认知障碍事件的关联:来自阿尔茨海默病中心的数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Dec;15(12):1533-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
A Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Tests for the Assessment of Dementia in Non-Western, Low-Educated or Illiterate Populations.非西方文化、低教育水平或文盲人群中痴呆症评估的神经心理学测试的系统评价。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Mar;26(3):331-351. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000894. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial.从 α 到 ω 的可靠性:教程。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1395-1411. doi: 10.1037/pas0000754. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need.阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的种族和民族差异视角:更新与当前急需领域。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Feb;15(2):292-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
Version 3 of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set.国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心的统一数据集第 3 版。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2018 Oct-Dec;32(4):351-358. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000279.
9
Patient and caregiver goals for dementia care.痴呆症护理的患者及照护者目标。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):685-693. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1471-7. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations.lordif:一个用于使用迭代混合有序逻辑回归/项目反应理论和蒙特卡罗模拟检测项目功能差异的R包。
J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar 1;39(8):1-30. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i08.