• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助质量保证。批判性评估。

Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.

作者信息

Haynes R B, Walker C J

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jul;147(7):1297-301.

PMID:3606287
Abstract

Computerized information systems hold the promise of overcoming problems in the management of clinical information Many of the claims of the creators and promoters of these systems, however, are not based on sound clinical studies. To determine the ability of computer information systems to improve the quality of medical care, we applied methodologic criteria to published articles in the field. Only 30 (22%) of 135 articles reported preplanned investigations, and only half of these met minimal criteria for scientific investigations. Fourteen studies were well designed and executed. All studies reported improvements in the process of care. However, patient outcomes were not measured, not affected, or only minimally influenced. While computer information systems show increasing potential, more work is required to enhance their effect on the quality of care and thus on patient outcomes.

摘要

计算机化信息系统有望解决临床信息管理中的问题。然而,这些系统的创建者和推广者的许多说法并非基于可靠的临床研究。为了确定计算机信息系统改善医疗质量的能力,我们将方法学标准应用于该领域已发表的文章。135篇文章中只有30篇(22%)报告了预先计划的调查,其中只有一半符合科学调查的最低标准。14项研究设计良好且执行得当。所有研究都报告了护理过程的改善。然而,未对患者结局进行测量、未产生影响或仅有极小的影响。虽然计算机信息系统显示出越来越大的潜力,但仍需要开展更多工作来增强其对护理质量进而对患者结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.计算机辅助质量保证。批判性评估。
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jul;147(7):1297-301.
2
Quality control in a medical information system.医学信息系统中的质量控制。
Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4 Suppl):S57-60.
3
[Well-informed on health matters--how well? The German 'Clearinghouse for Patient Information'--objective, background and methods].[了解健康问题——了解程度如何?德国“患者信息交流中心”——目标、背景与方法]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Jul;64(7):391-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32812.
4
Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care.利用计算机化医学数据库来衡量和提高重症监护质量。
J Crit Care. 2004 Dec;19(4):248-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.08.004.
5
Computerized decision support and the quality of care.计算机化决策支持与医疗质量。
Manag Care. 2000 May;9(5):41-2, 44-6, 48-51.
6
The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part I. Information systems for medical transactions.信息技术在提升医疗绩效中的应用。第一部分。医疗交易信息系统。
MedGenMed. 2000 Feb 7;2(1):E14.
7
A framework for evaluation of medical information systems.医学信息系统评估框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:611-6.
8
[Quality assurance of medical information in the internet--challenges for a seal of approval in gynecology].
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2001 Aug;123(8):458-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17244.
9
The computerized patient record: where do we stand ?计算机化患者记录:我们目前的状况如何?
Yearb Med Inform. 2006:29-39.
10
Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.创建以价值为导向的医疗服务体系:第三部分——核心竞争力。
J Oncol Manag. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):16-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.以纸质形式向医疗保健专业人员发送的计算机生成提醒:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD001175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001175.pub4.
2
Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior.系统评价提醒对改善医疗保健专业人员行为有效性的概述。
Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 16;1:36. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-36.
3
The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems.
评估临床信息系统影响的随机对照试验案例。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):173-80. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.010306. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review.计算机化临床指南在医疗过程中的效果:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 4;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-2.
5
Diagnosis, Information Management, Teaching, and Record Coding Using the CONSULTANT Database.使用顾问数据库进行诊断、信息管理、教学和记录编码。
Can Vet J. 1988 Mar;29(3):271-4.
6
Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.制定和实施临床实践指南。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55.
7
Implementing guidelines in general practice care.在全科医疗中实施指南。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184-91. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184.
8
Computerized management of diabetes: a synthesis of controlled trials.糖尿病的计算机化管理:对照试验综述
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:295-9.
9
Effect of physician profiling on utilization. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.医生画像对医疗服务利用的影响。随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Oct;11(10):584-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02599025.
10
Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: the impact on quality, time, and money.计算机化病历的电子表格评估:对质量、时间和成本的影响。
J Med Syst. 1996 Apr;20(2):85-100. doi: 10.1007/BF02260893.