• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制性环境监管对绿色发展效率的影响:来自中国的证据。

The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on green development efficiency: evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, 410006, Hunan, China.

School of Finance, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, 410205, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):9782-9792. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22815-1. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22815-1
PMID:36063272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9442595/
Abstract

The existing literature finds that mandatory environmental regulation (MER) can significantly reduce environmental pollution. However, much less is known about how the implementation of MER affects green development efficiency (GDE). Based on the Air Pollution Control Action Plan which was enforced in 2013 in China's most developed regions as an exogenous shock, we find that first, MER has a significant negative effect on the improvement of GDE by reducing regional scale efficiency. Second, MER mainly reduces the GDE of cities with stronger regulation intensities and with larger economic volumes. Third, MER also has a negative impact on regional green total factor productivity by changing technical progress. We suggest that when implementing MER, governments should enhance regional and global cooperation, promote green technology, and use comprehensive policy tools to stimulate firms' green innovation.

摘要

现有文献发现,强制性环境监管(MER)可以显著减少环境污染。然而,对于 MER 的实施如何影响绿色发展效率(GDE),人们知之甚少。基于 2013 年在中国最发达地区实施的《大气污染防治行动计划》这一外生冲击,我们发现,首先,MER 通过降低区域规模效率,对 GDE 的提高有显著的负向影响。其次,MER 主要降低了监管强度更强、经济规模更大的城市的 GDE。第三,MER 通过改变技术进步,对区域绿色全要素生产率也有负向影响。我们建议,在实施 MER 时,政府应加强区域和全球合作,推广绿色技术,并使用综合政策工具来激发企业的绿色创新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/f9e9643e3fd6/11356_2022_22815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/6653590cb840/11356_2022_22815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/b09ae3b79a70/11356_2022_22815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/a393ba340dc2/11356_2022_22815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/b39bb1862746/11356_2022_22815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/4ec8661f452a/11356_2022_22815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/f9e9643e3fd6/11356_2022_22815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/6653590cb840/11356_2022_22815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/b09ae3b79a70/11356_2022_22815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/a393ba340dc2/11356_2022_22815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/b39bb1862746/11356_2022_22815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/4ec8661f452a/11356_2022_22815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/9442595/f9e9643e3fd6/11356_2022_22815_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on green development efficiency: evidence from China.强制性环境监管对绿色发展效率的影响:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):9782-9792. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22815-1. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Does green credit promote green sustainable development in regional economies?-Empirical evidence from 280 cities in China.绿色信贷是否能促进区域经济的绿色可持续发展?——来自中国 280 个城市的实证证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0277569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277569. eCollection 2022.
3
Local Government Competition and Regional Green Development in China: The Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation.中国地方政府竞争与区域绿色发展:环境规制的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 16;17(10):3485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103485.
4
Environmental regulation and carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from pollution levy standards adjustment in China.环境规制与碳排放效率:来自中国污染收费标准调整的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 1;19(2):e0296642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296642. eCollection 2024.
5
How to Evaluate Investment Efficiency of Environmental Pollution Control: Evidence from China.如何评估环境污染控制的投资效率:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127252.
6
Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China.政府研发补贴、环境法规及其对中国长江经济带制造业绿色创新效率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041330.
7
Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and green productivity growth in China: Green innovation or pollution refuge?中国环境规制与绿色生产效率增长的策略互动:绿色创新还是污染避难?
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 25;732:139200. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139200. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
How does manufacturing haze pollution decrease in China: a decomposition study of structural model based on general equilibrium framework.中国制造业霾污染如何减少:基于一般均衡框架的结构模型分解研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):34872-34889. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24699-7. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
9
A Blessing or a Curse? Exploring the Impact of Environmental Regulation on China's Regional Green Development from the Perspective of Governance Transformation.是福是祸?从治理转型视角探究环境规制对中国区域绿色发展的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031312.
10
Does emission trading system improve the urban land green use efficiency? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities.排放交易系统是否能提高城市土地绿色利用效率?来自中国城市的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(58):121666-121683. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30678-3. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Autophagy Improves Inflammatory Response in Sepsis Accompanied by Changes in Gut Microbiota.自噬可改善脓毒症伴肠道菌群变化的炎症反应。
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 Oct 18;2024:9550301. doi: 10.1155/2024/9550301. eCollection 2024.
2
Environmental, social and governance performance and green transformation strategies for enterprises: Improving technical efficiency or expanding technological boundaries.企业的环境、社会和治理绩效与绿色转型策略:是提高技术效率还是拓展技术边界。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0299767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299767. eCollection 2024.
3
The Relationship between Environmental Regulation, Green-Technology Innovation and Green Total-Factor Productivity-Evidence from 279 Cities in China.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the US economy: Fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach.美国经济中新冠疫情、油价、股市、地缘政治风险与政策不确定性之间的联系:基于小波方法的新证据
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2020 Jul;70:101496. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101496. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Capital misallocation, technological innovation, and green development efficiency: empirical analysis based on China provincial panel data.资本错配、技术创新与绿色发展效率:基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):65535-65548. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20364-1. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
环境规制、绿色技术创新与绿色全要素生产率关系研究——来自中国 279 个城市的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316290.
4
How to Efficiently Reduce the Carbon Intensity of the Heavy Industry in China? Using Quantile Regression Approach.如何有效地降低中国重工业的碳强度?使用分位数回归方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;19(19):12865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912865.
Will green finance promote green development: based on the threshold effect of R&D investment.
绿色金融能否促进绿色发展:基于研发投入的门槛效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60232-60243. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20161-w. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Interventions for the Current COVID-19 Pandemic: Frontline Workers' Intention to Use Personal Protective Equipment.当前 COVID-19 大流行的干预措施:一线工作人员使用个人防护设备的意愿。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;9:793642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.793642. eCollection 2021.
5
Retesting the EKC hypothesis through transmission of the ARMEY curve model: an alternative composite model approach with theory and policy implications for NAFTA countries.通过 ARMEY 曲线模型的传递重新检验 EKC 假说:一种具有理论和政策意义的北美自由贸易协定国家的替代综合模型方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):46587-46599. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19106-0. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?-A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China.碳排放交易体系能否提高试点城市的绿色全要素生产率?——基于中国空间双重差分的计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031209.
7
Asymmetric nexus between technological innovation and environmental degradation in Sweden: an aggregated and disaggregated analysis.瑞典技术创新与环境退化之间的非对称关系:综合和细分分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):36547-36564. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17982-6. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
Does FDI improve green total factor energy efficiency under heterogeneous environmental regulation? Evidence from China.FDI 是否会在异质环境规制下提高绿色全要素能源效率?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25665-25678. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17771-1. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
Does interaction between technological innovation and natural resource rent impact environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries? New evidence from method of moments quantile regression.技术创新与自然资源租金之间的相互作用是否会影响新兴工业化国家的环境恶化?矩量分位数回归方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):3162-3169. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17631-y. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO emissions: evidence from Portugal.可再生能源消费和技术创新对碳排放影响的小波分析:来自葡萄牙的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23887-23904. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17708-8. Epub 2021 Nov 24.