• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项 3 期研究中辅助用依佐加滨治疗未控制局灶性发作的事后分析:根据基线发作频率确定的辅助用依佐加滨剂量与发作减少情况。

Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study for treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures: Adjunctive cenobamate dose and seizure reduction by baseline seizure frequency.

机构信息

Austin Epilepsy Care Center, Austin, TX, USA.

Arkansas Epilepsy Program, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2022 Oct;186:107014. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107014. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107014
PMID:36063589
Abstract

This post hoc analysis (n = 240) of a subset of study sites (10 eligible US sites) from an open-label phase 3 study assessed whether baseline seizure frequency (<3 seizures/28 days vs ≥3 seizures/28 days) impacted mean cenobamate dose required to achieve 100% seizure reduction, duration of this response, and responder rates. Patients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of 1-3 antiseizure medications were administered increasing doses of cenobamate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/day) over 12 weeks at 2-week intervals. Further increases to 400 mg/day by 50-mg/day biweekly increments were allowed during the maintenance phase. Eligible patients were required to have consistent raw seizure data and good-quality data for ≥ 85% of the time spent in the study. Data were assessed until last visit and at data cut-off, on or after September 1, 2019. Among all 240 patients, 127 (52.9%) had < 3 seizures/28 days, and 113 (47.1%) had ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline. Among patients continuing cenobamate at data cut-off (n = 177), 51% (90/177) and 49% (87/177) had < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Retention rate at data cut-off was 73.8% (177/240 patients), and these patients had a median time on study of 32.9 months (range: 22.1-43.0 months). 33.9% of patients continuing cenobamate (60/177) achieved 100% seizure reduction for ≥ 12 months at data cut-off, with 44.4% and 23.0% in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Regardless of baseline seizure frequency, responder rates at ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% during the maintenance phase were similar (∼81%, ∼62%, and ∼43%, respectively). Mean±SD cenobamate dose for patients continuing cenobamate was 254.0 ± 82.1 mg/day, with means of 237.9 ± 78.1 mg/day and 270.7 ± 83.1 mg/day in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Among patients who had 100% seizure reduction for ≥ 12 months at data cut-off (n = 60), the mean cenobamate dose was 226.4 ± 75.4 mg/day and 255.1 ± 93.7 mg/day in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. The current data suggest that cenobamate was effective regardless of baseline seizure frequency, with both groups having a high number of patients reaching 100% seizure reduction. A higher percentage of patients with less vs more frequent seizures at baseline reached zero seizures, suggesting these patients may reach 100% seizure reduction at lower cenobamate doses than those with more frequent seizures. Cenobamate dose varied slightly (∼30 mg/day) across patients who were stratified by baseline seizure frequency, but future analyses are necessary to determine whether patients with more frequent seizures require higher doses of cenobamate to achieve zero seizures.

摘要

本事后分析(n=240)纳入了一项开放标签 3 期研究的部分研究地点(10 个合格的美国研究地点),评估了基线发作频率(<3 次/28 天与≥3 次/28 天)是否影响达到 100%发作减少所需的依诺佐胺平均剂量、该反应的持续时间和应答率。正在服用 1-3 种抗癫痫药物且病情未得到控制的局灶性癫痫患者接受递增剂量的依诺佐胺(12.5、25、50、100、150、200mg/天)治疗,治疗时间为 12 周,间隔 2 周。在维持阶段,允许通过每两周增加 50mg/天的方式进一步增加至 400mg/天。符合条件的患者需要有一致的原始发作数据和≥85%的研究期间的高质量数据。数据评估持续到最后一次就诊和数据截止日期(2019 年 9 月 1 日或之后)。在所有 240 例患者中,127 例(52.9%)基线发作频率<3 次/28 天,113 例(47.1%)基线发作频率≥3 次/28 天。在数据截止日期时继续服用依诺佐胺的 177 例患者中,分别有 51%(90/177)和 49%(87/177)基线发作频率<3 次/28 天和≥3 次/28 天。数据截止日期时的保留率为 73.8%(177/240 例患者),这些患者的中位研究时间为 32.9 个月(范围:22.1-43.0 个月)。继续服用依诺佐胺的患者中有 33.9%(60/177)在数据截止日期时达到 100%的发作减少,基线发作频率<3 次/28 天和≥3 次/28 天的患者分别为 44.4%和 23.0%。无论基线发作频率如何,在维持阶段达到≥50%、≥75%和≥90%应答率的患者比例相似(分别约为 81%、约为 62%和约为 43%)。继续服用依诺佐胺的患者的平均依诺佐胺剂量±SD 为 254.0±82.1mg/天,基线发作频率<3 次/28 天和≥3 次/28 天的患者分别为 237.9±78.1mg/天和 270.7±83.1mg/天。在数据截止日期时达到 100%的发作减少且持续时间≥12 个月的 60 例患者中,分别有 226.4±75.4mg/天和 255.1±93.7mg/天。

相似文献

1
Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study for treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures: Adjunctive cenobamate dose and seizure reduction by baseline seizure frequency.一项 3 期研究中辅助用依佐加滨治疗未控制局灶性发作的事后分析:根据基线发作频率确定的辅助用依佐加滨剂量与发作减少情况。
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Oct;186:107014. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107014. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Post hoc analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study of cenobamate for treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures: Effects of dose adjustments of concomitant antiseizure medications.一项 3 期、多中心、开放性研究的事后分析:cenobamate 治疗未控制的局灶性发作的疗效:伴随抗癫痫药物剂量调整的影响。
Epilepsia. 2021 Dec;62(12):3016-3028. doi: 10.1111/epi.17092. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
3
Efficacy of cenobamate for uncontrolled focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.cenobamate 治疗未控制局灶性癫痫发作的疗效:一项 3 期、多中心、开放标签研究的事后分析。
Epilepsia. 2021 Dec;62(12):3005-3015. doi: 10.1111/epi.17091. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Efficacy of cenobamate for uncontrolled focal seizures in patients with previous epilepsy-related surgery: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.先前癫痫相关手术后发作控制不佳的患者使用cenobamate 的疗效:一项 3 期、多中心、开放标签研究的事后分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Aug;184:106952. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106952. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate based on number of concomitant antiseizure medications, seizure frequency, and epilepsy duration at baseline: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical study.基于基线时同时使用的抗癫痫药物数量、癫痫发作频率和癫痫持续时间的辅助用cenobamate 的疗效:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2021 May;172:106592. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106592. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Cenobamate for the Treatment of Focal Seizures in Older Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.氯巴占治疗老年患者局灶性癫痫发作的安全性和有效性:一项III期多中心开放标签研究的事后分析
Drugs Aging. 2024 Mar;41(3):251-260. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01102-3. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Efficacy of cenobamate by focal seizure subtypes: Post-hoc analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.cenobamate 对局灶性癫痫发作亚型的疗效:一项 3 期、多中心、开放性研究的事后分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Jul;183:106940. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106940. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Reductions in concomitant antiseizure medication drug load during adjunctive cenobamate therapy: Post-hoc analysis of a subset of patients from a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.在添加用cenobamate 治疗期间,伴随抗癫痫药物药物负荷减少:来自一项 3 期、多中心、开放标签研究的患者亚组的事后分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Feb;200:107306. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107306. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
Randomized phase 2 study of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.随机 2 期研究附加用 Cenobamate 治疗未控制局灶性发作患者。
Neurology. 2020 Jun 2;94(22):e2311-e2322. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009530. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate based on patient etiology: Post-hoc analysis of YKP3089C017 randomized clinical trial.依患者病因评估添加用依佐加滨的疗效和安全性:YKP3089C017 随机临床试验的事后分析。
Seizure. 2024 May;118:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Introduction of Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: Insights from a Structured Controversy.在未经控制的局灶性癫痫中早期引入司替戊醇:结构化争议的见解
Neurol Ther. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00781-3.
2
The Effectiveness of Cenobamate in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug Resistant Epilepsy.氯巴占在接受迷走神经刺激治疗的耐药性癫痫患者中的有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70229. doi: 10.1111/ene.70229.
3
Cenobamate: A Review in Focal-Onset Seizures.司替戊醇:局灶性发作的综述
CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01178-4.
4
Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of the patients included into the Early Access Programs (EAP) in Germany, France, and United Kingdom.司替戊醇在耐药性癫痫中的真实世界有效性和耐受性:对德国、法国和英国早期准入项目(EAP)纳入患者的回顾性分析。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70021.
5
Cenobamate as an Early Adjunctive Treatment in Drug-Resistant Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational Cohort Study.cenobamate 作为耐药局灶性发作性癫痫的早期辅助治疗:一项观察性队列研究。
CNS Drugs. 2024 Sep;38(9):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01109-9. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
6
Established and emerging GABA receptor pharmacotherapy for epilepsy.用于癫痫的已确立和新兴的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)受体药物治疗
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 21;15:1341472. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1341472. eCollection 2024.
7
Cenobamate (YKP3089) and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature.依诺贝酸(YKP3089)与耐药性癫痫:文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 28;59(8):1389. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081389.
8
New GABA-Targeting Therapies for the Treatment of Seizures and Epilepsy: I. Role of GABA as a Modulator of Seizure Activity and Recently Approved Medications Acting on the GABA System.用于治疗癫痫发作和癫痫的新型 GABA 靶向治疗药物:I. GABA 作为癫痫活动调节剂的作用,以及最近批准的作用于 GABA 系统的药物。
CNS Drugs. 2023 Sep;37(9):755-779. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01027-2. Epub 2023 Aug 21.