• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚的全科医疗中,优化阿片类药物安全有效使用的研究重点是什么?

What are the research priorities for optimising the safe and effective use of opioids in Australian general practice?

机构信息

Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Mar;42(3):604-613. doi: 10.1111/dar.13539. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/dar.13539
PMID:36065154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10946507/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Persistent high rates of prescription opioid use and harms remain a concern in Australia, Europe and North America. Research priority setting can inform the research agenda, strategic responses and evidence-based interventions. The objective of this study was to establish research priorities related to the safe and effective use of prescription opioids in general practice.

METHODS

Consumers, clinicians and policy makers were invited to participate in a structured consensus workshop in May 2021. A modified nominal group technique was used to explore research priorities for the safe and effective use of opioids in Australian general practice. Research priorities were identified, consolidated and prioritised using a structured process.

RESULTS

Seventeen consumer, medical, pharmacy, nursing, allied health and policy participants generated 26 consolidated priorities across three domains: (i) consumer-focused priorities; (ii) clinician and practice-focused priorities; and (iii) system and policy-focused priorities. The highest ranked research priorities in each of the domains were consumer characteristics that influence opioid prescribing and outcomes, opioid deprescribing strategies, and system-level barriers to prescribing alternatives to opioids, in the consumer, clinician and practice, and system and policy domains, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The priorities reflect opportunities for research priority setting within Australian general practice. The priorities provide a map for future qualitative and quantitative research that will inform safe and effective opioid prescribing.

摘要

简介

在澳大利亚、欧洲和北美,处方类阿片药物的持续高使用率和相关危害仍然令人担忧。研究重点的设定可以为研究议程、战略应对措施和循证干预措施提供信息。本研究的目的是确定与普通实践中处方类阿片药物的安全和有效使用相关的研究重点。

方法

2021 年 5 月,邀请消费者、临床医生和政策制定者参加了一个结构化的共识研讨会。采用改良的名义群体技术来探讨澳大利亚普通实践中安全有效使用阿片类药物的研究重点。使用结构化的过程确定、整合和优先考虑研究重点。

结果

17 名消费者、医疗、药剂、护理、联合健康和政策参与者在三个领域生成了 26 个综合重点:(i)以消费者为重点的重点;(ii)以临床医生和实践为重点的重点;(iii)以系统和政策为重点的重点。在每个领域中排名最高的研究重点分别是影响阿片类药物处方和结果的消费者特征、阿片类药物停药策略以及系统层面上替代阿片类药物处方的障碍,分别在消费者、临床医生和实践以及系统和政策领域。

讨论与结论

这些重点反映了澳大利亚普通实践中进行研究重点设定的机会。这些重点为未来的定性和定量研究提供了一个蓝图,将为安全有效的阿片类药物处方提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/f0aebf007cdf/DAR-42-604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/e737bb863b24/DAR-42-604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/dd2493a5cf6f/DAR-42-604-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/d62768ff8eac/DAR-42-604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/f0aebf007cdf/DAR-42-604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/e737bb863b24/DAR-42-604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/dd2493a5cf6f/DAR-42-604-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/d62768ff8eac/DAR-42-604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0229/10946507/f0aebf007cdf/DAR-42-604-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
What are the research priorities for optimising the safe and effective use of opioids in Australian general practice?在澳大利亚的全科医疗中,优化阿片类药物安全有效使用的研究重点是什么?
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Mar;42(3):604-613. doi: 10.1111/dar.13539. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Qualitative insights into the opioid prescribing practices of Australian GP.澳大利亚全科医生阿片类药物处方实践的定性洞察
Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 23;37(3):412-417. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz083.
4
Opioid prescribing in general practice: an Australian cross-sectional survey.全科医生开具阿片类药物处方的情况:澳大利亚横断面调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01783-y.
5
Opioid prescribing among aged care residents during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis using general practice health records in Australia.2019年冠状病毒病大流行第一年澳大利亚老年护理机构居民的阿片类药物处方情况:一项基于澳大利亚全科医疗健康记录的分析
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03821-5.
6
Chronic Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: Factors and Perspectives.基层医疗中长期阿片类药物处方:影响因素与观点。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):200-206. doi: 10.1370/afm.2357.
7
The Pattern of Opioid Management by Australian General Practice Trainees.澳大利亚全科医学实习生的阿片类药物管理模式
Pain Med. 2015 Sep;16(9):1720-31. doi: 10.1111/pme.12820. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
8
Managing Opioids, Including Misuse and Addiction, in Patients With Serious Illness in Ambulatory Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study.在门诊姑息治疗中管理阿片类药物,包括滥用和成瘾:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jul;37(7):507-513. doi: 10.1177/1049909119890556. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
The opioid-prescribing practices of Australian general practice registrars: an interview study.澳大利亚全科住院医师阿片类药物处方实践:一项访谈研究。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):473-478. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa148.
10
Barriers and enablers to monitoring and deprescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类镇痛药监测与减药的障碍及促进因素:运用理论领域框架进行定性证据综合分析的方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e034039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034039.

引用本文的文献

1
A time-series analysis of the use of opioid medications in a network of Brazilian hospitals, 2009-2020.2009 - 2020年巴西医院网络中阿片类药物使用情况的时间序列分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 7;48:101167. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101167. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Prescription of Strong Opioids in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in the Province of Valladolid (Spain).西班牙巴利亚多利德省慢性非癌性疼痛中强阿片类药物的处方情况
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;15(1):114. doi: 10.3390/life15010114.
3
Impact of codeine rescheduling on prescribing of codeine and other opioids: Interrupted time series analyses using Australian general practice data.

本文引用的文献

1
Best Practices, Research Gaps, and Future Priorities to Support Tapering Patients on Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Outpatient Settings.支持门诊环境中慢性非癌性疼痛长期使用阿片类药物治疗的患者逐渐减药的最佳实践、研究差距及未来优先事项
NAM Perspect. 2020 Aug 10;2020. doi: 10.31478/202008c. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Visits With Primary Care Visits.直接面向消费者的远程医疗就诊与初级保健就诊比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028392. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28392.
3
Deprescribing long-term opioid therapy in patients with chronic pain.
可待因重新分类对可待因及其他阿片类药物处方的影响:利用澳大利亚全科医疗数据进行的中断时间序列分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;91(1):190-198. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16246. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Trajectories of prescription opioid tapering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a retrospective cohort study, 2015-2020.2015-2020 年慢性非癌痛患者阿片类药物递减治疗轨迹:回顾性队列研究。
Pain Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):263-274. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae002.
5
Opioid characteristics and nonopioid interventions associated with successful opioid taper in patients with chronic noncancer pain.阿片类药物特性和非阿片类药物干预措施与慢性非癌痛患者成功阿片类药物减量相关。
Pain. 2024 Jun 1;165(6):1327-1335. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003133. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
在慢性疼痛患者中停用长期阿片类药物治疗。
Intern Med J. 2020 Oct;50(10):1185-1191. doi: 10.1111/imj.15023.
4
Predictors of Prolonged Opioid Use After Initial Prescription for Acute Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.成人急性肌肉骨骼损伤初始处方后阿片类药物使用时间延长的预测因素:系统评价和观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):721-729. doi: 10.7326/M19-3600. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Strategies to promote access to medications during the COVID-19 pandemic.促进 COVID-19 大流行期间药物获取的策略。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug;49(8):530-532. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-04-20-5390.
6
The Balanced Opioid Initiative: protocol for a clustered, sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial to construct an adaptive implementation strategy to improve guideline-concordant opioid prescribing in primary care.平衡阿片类药物倡议:一项整群、序贯、多分配随机试验的方案,以构建一种适应性实施策略,改善初级保健中符合指南的阿片类药物处方。
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 25;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00990-4.
7
Changes in sales of analgesics to pharmacies after codeine was rescheduled as a prescription only medicine.可待因被重新列为凭处方销售的药物后,向药店销售的镇痛药发生的变化。
Med J Aust. 2020 Apr;212(7):321-327. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50552. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
8
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).健康研究优先排序报告指南(REPRISE)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3.
9
General practice research priority setting in Australia: Informing a research agenda to deliver best patient care.澳大利亚全科医学研究重点制定:为提供最佳患者护理制定研究议程。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov;48(11):789-795. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-05-19-4928.
10
Patient health literacy and the receipt of opioids in the emergency department.患者健康素养与急诊科阿片类药物的使用
J Opioid Manag. 2019 Jul/Aug;15(4):267-271. doi: 10.5055/jom.2019.0511.