University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):540-560. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12571. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
Many things in life are ambivalent, and it might sometimes be useful or necessary to ignore their positive attributes when judging their negative attributes and vice versa. Cross-valence inhibition may complicate this task, leading people to underestimate the positive and negative attributes of ambivalent stimuli. In three studies (total N = 155), participants learned to associate combined evaluative information (gains and losses) with attributes of unfamiliar objects (size and colour of Chernoff faces). Participants then estimated (Studies 1-3) or experienced and recalled (Study 3) the gains and losses associated with novel ambivalent attribute combinations. As predicted, both in estimation and recall, participants rated gains (losses) to be lower, the higher the losses (gains) associated with the stimulus. The effect occurred only when the two attributes were evaluatively conflicting (Study 2). Cross-valence inhibition might lead to maladaptive behaviour when positive and negative attributes are in fact separable in hedonic experience.
生活中有很多事物都是矛盾的,在判断其负面属性时忽略其正面属性,或者在判断其正面属性时忽略其负面属性,有时可能是有用的或必要的。交叉效价抑制可能会使这项任务变得复杂,导致人们低估矛盾刺激的正面和负面属性。在三项研究中(总人数=155),参与者学习将组合评价信息(收益和损失)与不熟悉物体的属性(切尔诺夫面孔的大小和颜色)联系起来。然后,参与者估计(研究 1-3)或体验和回忆(研究 3)与新的矛盾属性组合相关的收益和损失。正如预测的那样,在估计和回忆中,当与刺激相关的损失(收益)越高时,参与者对收益(损失)的评价越低。当两个属性在评价上存在冲突时(研究 2),这种效应才会出现。当积极和消极的属性实际上在享乐体验中是可分离的时候,交叉效价抑制可能会导致适应不良的行为。