van Harreveld F, van der Pligt J, de Vries N K, Andreas S
Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Sep;39 ( Pt 3):363-80. doi: 10.1348/014466600164543.
Two studies related attribute importance to accessibility and speed of judgment. Attitudes were assessed by a direct attitude measure and a modal set of 15 attributes. Attributes were rated in terms of their probability and desirability. Subsequently, participants were required to select the five attributes they considered to be most important. Results of Study 1 (dealing with attitudes towards condom use) show that individually selected, important attributes are more easily retrieved and judged faster than non-selected, less important attributes. Judging attributes took less time than evaluating one's overall attitude, suggesting a bottom-up process in which the various attributes are combined to form an overall attitude. Study 2 (dealing with attitudes towards smoking) extends these findings and also addresses the stability of attitude structure. Important attributes were again associated with reduced response times, and attribute-related judgments took less time than judging one's overall attitude. Accessibility of important attributes remained stable over time as indicated by the results of a lexical decision task one week later. Finally, important attributes were also recalled better than less important attributes. Implications for research on attitude structure are discussed.
两项研究将属性重要性与可及性和判断速度联系起来。通过直接态度测量和一组包含15个属性的模式集来评估态度。根据属性的可能性和可取性对其进行评级。随后,要求参与者选择他们认为最重要的五个属性。研究1(关于对使用避孕套的态度)的结果表明,与未被选中的、不太重要的属性相比,个体选择的重要属性更容易被检索且判断速度更快。判断属性所花费的时间比评估个人总体态度的时间少,这表明存在一个自下而上的过程,即各种属性被组合形成总体态度。研究2(关于对吸烟的态度)扩展了这些发现,并探讨了态度结构的稳定性。重要属性再次与较短的反应时间相关,且与属性相关的判断比判断个人总体态度花费的时间少。一周后的词汇判定任务结果表明,重要属性的可及性随时间保持稳定。最后,重要属性的回忆效果也优于不太重要的属性。本文讨论了这些结果对态度结构研究的启示。