• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between Care Fragmentation and Total Spending After Durable Left Ventricular Device Implant: A Mediation Analysis of Health Care-Associated Infections Within a National Medicare-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Linked Dataset.耐用性左心室装置植入后护理碎片化与总支出的关联:基于国家医疗保险-胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 链接数据集的医疗保健相关感染中介分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e008592. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008592. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中,永久性心室辅助装置植入术后,医院间医疗保健相关感染和支付的差异性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1561-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.074. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Center Variation in Medicare Spending for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Hospitalizations.医疗保险对耐用型左心室辅助装置植入住院费用的中心差异。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):153-160. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4717.
4
Care fragmentation predicts 90-day durable ventricular assist device outcomes.护理碎片化可预测 90 天耐用性心室辅助装置结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(12):e444-e451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89280.
5
Association of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation With Adverse Events and Quality of Life.心室辅助装置植入术后存活天数和出院天数与不良事件及生活质量的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Apr 1;158(4):e228127. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8127. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Comparison of Evaluations for Heart Transplant Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device and Subsequent Receipt of Transplant at Transplant vs Nontransplant Centers.心脏移植前使用耐用性左心室辅助装置评估与在移植中心和非移植中心接受移植后的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40646.
7
Association of Health Insurance Payer Type and Outcomes After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An Analysis of the STS-INTERMACS Registry.医保支付类型与植入式耐用左心室辅助装置术后结局的相关性:STS-INTERMACS 注册分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e008277. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008277. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.
9
Clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures in the real world with left ventricular assist devices - The CLEAR-LVAD study.左心室辅助装置在现实世界中的临床结局与医疗支出——CLEAR-LVAD研究
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 May;40(5):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断变化的适应证、结果和科学合作》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Healthcare consumption of patients with left ventricular assist device: real-world data.左心室辅助装置患者的医疗保健消费:真实世界数据。
Neth Heart J. 2024 Sep;32(9):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01885-5. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.左心室辅助装置患者的共同护理:范围综述。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 2;66(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae285.
4
Infections following left ventricular assist device implantation and 1-year health-related quality of life.左心室辅助装置植入术后感染与 1 年健康相关生活质量。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Sep;42(9):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Care fragmentation predicts 90-day durable ventricular assist device outcomes.护理碎片化可预测 90 天耐用性心室辅助装置结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(12):e444-e451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89280.
2
Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中,永久性心室辅助装置植入术后,医院间医疗保健相关感染和支付的差异性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1561-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.074. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 2020 年度报告》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Outcomes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange: Focus on the Impacts of Device Infection.左心室辅助装置更换后的结果:关注装置感染的影响。
ASAIO J. 2021 Jun 1;67(6):642-649. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001287.
5
Left ventricular assist systems and infection-related outcomes: A comprehensive analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 trial.左心室辅助系统与感染相关结局:MOMENTUM 3 试验的综合分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Aug;39(8):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Impact of Shared Care in Remote Areas for Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.远程地区左心室辅助设备患者共享护理的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.01.004.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.胸外科医生协会 Intermacs 2019 年度报告:设备和适应证的变化格局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005.
8
Prevention and early treatment of driveline infections in ventricular assist device patients - The DESTINE staging proposal and the first standard of care protocol.预防和早期治疗心室辅助装置患者的移植物感染——DESTINE 分期建议和首个标准治疗方案。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report.全磁悬浮左心室辅助装置 - 最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 25;380(17):1618-1627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
10
Center Variation in Medicare Spending for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Hospitalizations.医疗保险对耐用型左心室辅助装置植入住院费用的中心差异。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):153-160. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4717.

耐用性左心室装置植入后护理碎片化与总支出的关联:基于国家医疗保险-胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 链接数据集的医疗保健相关感染中介分析。

Association Between Care Fragmentation and Total Spending After Durable Left Ventricular Device Implant: A Mediation Analysis of Health Care-Associated Infections Within a National Medicare-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Linked Dataset.

机构信息

Strategy, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (K.D.K.).

Department of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (R.J.F.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e008592. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008592. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008592
PMID:36065815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489640/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care fragmentation is associated with higher rates of infection after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. Less is known about the relationship between care fragmentation and total spending, and whether this relationship is mediated by infections.

METHODS

Total payments were captured from admission to 180 days post-discharge. Drawing on network theory, a measure of care fragmentation was developed based on the number of shared patients among providers (ie, anesthesiologists, cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, critical care specialists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) caring for 4,987 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing LVAD implantation between July 2009 - April 2017. Care fragmentation was measured using average path length, which describes how efficiently information flows among network members; longer path length indicates greater fragmentation. Terciles based on the level of care fragmentation and multivariable regression were used to analyze the relationship between care fragmentation and LVAD payments and mediation analysis was used to evaluate the role of post-implant infections.

RESULTS

The patient cohort was 81% male, 73% white, 11% Intermacs Profile 1 with mean (SD) age of 63.1 years (11.1). The mean (SD) level of care fragmentation in provider networks was 1.7 (0.2) and mean (SD) payment from admission to 180 days post-discharge was $246,905 ($109,872). Mean (SD) total payments at the lower, middle, and upper terciles of care fragmentation were $250,135 ($111,924), $243,288 ($109,376), and $247,290 ($108,241), respectively. In mediation analysis, the indirect effect of care fragmentation on total payments, through infections, was positive and statistically significant (β=16032.5, p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater care fragmentation in the delivery of care surrounding durable LVAD implantation is associated with a higher incidence of infections, and consequently, higher payments for Medicare beneficiaries. Interventions to reduce care fragmentation may reduce the incidence of infections and in turn enhance the value of care for patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation.

摘要

背景

在接受耐用型左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后,护理碎片化与更高的感染率相关。关于护理碎片化与总支出之间的关系,以及这种关系是否通过感染来介导,人们了解较少。

方法

从入院到出院后 180 天,共采集了总费用。利用网络理论,根据照顾 4987 名接受 LVAD 植入术的 Medicare 受益人的提供者(即麻醉师、心脏外科医生、心脏病专家、重症监护专家、执业护士、医师助理)之间共享患者的数量,制定了一项护理碎片化措施(即麻醉师、心脏外科医生、心脏病专家、重症监护专家、执业护士、医师助理)。护理碎片化通过平均路径长度来衡量,平均路径长度描述了网络成员之间信息流动的效率;路径越长,碎片化程度越高。根据护理碎片化程度的三分位数和多变量回归分析护理碎片化与 LVAD 支付之间的关系,并采用中介分析评估植入后感染的作用。

结果

患者队列中 81%为男性,73%为白人,11%为 Intermacs Profile 1,平均(标准差)年龄为 63.1 岁(11.1)。提供者网络中的平均(标准差)护理碎片化水平为 1.7(0.2),从入院到出院后 180 天的平均(标准差)支付额为 246905 美元(109872 美元)。护理碎片化程度较低、中、高三分位的平均(标准差)总支出分别为 250135 美元(111924 美元)、243288 美元(109376 美元)和 247290 美元(108241 美元)。在中介分析中,通过感染,护理碎片化对总支出的间接影响为正且具有统计学意义(β=16032.5,p=0.008)。

结论

在耐用型 LVAD 植入术围手术期护理中,护理碎片化程度增加与感染发生率增加相关,从而导致 Medicare 受益人的支付额增加。减少护理碎片化的干预措施可能会降低感染发生率,并进而提高接受耐用型 LVAD 植入术患者的护理价值。