• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者的共同护理:范围综述。

Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 2;66(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae285.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezae285
PMID:39087552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11368409/
Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly implanted in patients with advanced heart failure. Currently, LVAD care is predominantly concentrated at specialized tertiary care hospitals. However, the increasing workload and logistical burden for implanting centres pose significant challenges to accessing care for individual patients in remote areas. An emerging approach to LVAD patient management is the use of a shared care model (SCM), which facilitates collaboration between implanting centres and local non-implanting hospitals. This scoping review explores and synthesizes the current scientific evidence on the use of SCMs in LVAD care management. Eligible studies were identified in EMBASE, PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Findings were synthesized in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Of the 950 records screened, five articles met the inclusion criteria. Four review articles focused on the proposed benefits and challenges of using SCMs. Main benefits included improved patient satisfaction and continuity of care. Important challenges were initial education of non-implanting centre staff and maintaining competency. One prospective study showed that absence of LVAD-specific care was associated with impaired survival and higher rates of pump thrombosis and LVAD-related infections. The use of SCMs is a promising approach in the long-term management of LVAD patients. However, sufficient evidence about the impact of SCMs on patients and the healthcare system is not currently available. Standardized protocols based on prospective studies are needed to develop safe and effective shared care for LVAD patients.

摘要

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)越来越多地被植入到晚期心力衰竭患者中。目前,LVAD 护理主要集中在专门的三级护理医院。然而,植入中心不断增加的工作量和后勤负担给偏远地区的个别患者获得护理带来了重大挑战。一种新兴的 LVAD 患者管理方法是使用共享护理模式(SCM),它促进了植入中心和当地非植入医院之间的合作。本范围综述探讨并综合了目前关于 SCM 在 LVAD 护理管理中应用的科学证据。在 EMBASE、PubMed MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar 中确定了合格的研究。根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南对研究结果进行了综合分析。在筛选的 950 条记录中,有 5 篇文章符合纳入标准。四篇综述文章重点讨论了使用 SCM 的预期益处和挑战。主要益处包括提高患者满意度和护理连续性。重要的挑战是对非植入中心工作人员进行初步教育以及保持能力。一项前瞻性研究表明,缺乏 LVAD 特定护理与生存率降低以及泵血栓形成和 LVAD 相关感染发生率增加有关。在 LVAD 患者的长期管理中,使用 SCM 是一种很有前途的方法。然而,目前尚无关于 SCM 对患者和医疗体系影响的充分证据。需要基于前瞻性研究的标准化方案来为 LVAD 患者制定安全有效的共享护理。

相似文献

1
Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.左心室辅助装置患者的共同护理:范围综述。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 2;66(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae285.
2
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
3
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.终末期心力衰竭患者使用左心室辅助装置的临床疗效及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(45):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9450.
4
Understanding Left Ventricular Assist Devices.了解左心室辅助设备。
Blood Purif. 2018;46(4):292-300. doi: 10.1159/000491872. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Impact of Shared Care in Remote Areas for Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.远程地区左心室辅助设备患者共享护理的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.01.004.
6
Self-care in patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD): A systematic review.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的自我护理:一项系统综述。
Appl Nurs Res. 2025 Apr;82:151929. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151929. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
7
Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.左心室辅助装置:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(3):1-69. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
8
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置和药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:ROADMAP 研究 2 年结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Virtual implantation and patient-specific simulation for optimization of outcomes in ventricular assist device recipients.虚拟植入和针对心室辅助装置接受者的个性化模拟以优化治疗效果
Med Hypotheses. 2016 Jun;91:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.左心室辅助装置(HeartMate II)的应用:新加坡的经验
Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12247. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies.心血管疾病管理的综合述评:心脏生物标志物、成像方式、药物治疗、手术干预和草药疗法。
Cells. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):1471. doi: 10.3390/cells13171471.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Care Fragmentation and Total Spending After Durable Left Ventricular Device Implant: A Mediation Analysis of Health Care-Associated Infections Within a National Medicare-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Linked Dataset.耐用性左心室装置植入后护理碎片化与总支出的关联:基于国家医疗保险-胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 链接数据集的医疗保健相关感染中介分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e008592. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008592. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Listing criteria for heart transplantation in the Netherlands.荷兰心脏移植的列入标准。
Neth Heart J. 2021 Dec;29(12):611-622. doi: 10.1007/s12471-021-01627-x. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Shared Care to Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device Site: a Novel Strategy to Start a Successful Mechanical Circulatory Support Program.
共享照护至目的地治疗左心室辅助装置部位:启动成功机械循环支持计划的新策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jul 15;23(8):112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01533-z.
4
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 2020 年度报告》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
5
Impact of Shared Care in Remote Areas for Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.远程地区左心室辅助设备患者共享护理的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.01.004.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家层面 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2017 年 354 种疾病和伤害导致的发病率、患病率和伤残损失寿命年:基于 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.一种系统的检索方法:一种开发文献检索的高效且完整的方法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):531-541. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Advanced heart failure: a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.心力衰竭的治疗进展:欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会立场声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Nov;20(11):1505-1535. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1236. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Impact of Patient Distance From Ventricular Assist Device-Implanting Center on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.患者距心室辅助装置植入中心的远近对短期和长期结局的影响。
ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec;64(6):721-726. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000717.
10
Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure.心力衰竭的全球公共卫生负担。
Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2.