Suppr超能文献

成人长期护理机构中的决策支持工具:范围综述。

Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 6;24(9):e39681. doi: 10.2196/39681.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital innovations are yet to make real impacts in the care home sector despite the considerable potential of digital health approaches to help with continued staff shortages and to improve quality of care. To understand the current landscape of digital innovation in long-term care facilities such as nursing and care homes, it is important to find out which clinical decision support tools are currently used in long-term care facilities, what their purpose is, how they were developed, and what types of data they use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to analyze studies that evaluated clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities based on the purpose and intended users of the tools, the evidence base used to develop the tools, how the tools are used and their effectiveness, and the types of data the tools use to contribute to the existing scientific evidence to inform a roadmap for digital innovation, specifically for clinical decision support tools, in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

A review of the literature published between January 1, 2010, and July 21, 2021, was conducted, using key search terms in 3 scientific journal databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the British Nursing Index. Only studies evaluating clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities were included in the review.

RESULTS

In total, 17 papers were included in the final review. The clinical decision support tools described in these papers were evaluated for medication management, pressure ulcer prevention, dementia management, falls prevention, hospitalization, malnutrition prevention, urinary tract infection, and COVID-19 infection. In general, the included studies show that decision support tools can show improvements in delivery of care and in health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the studies demonstrate the potential of positive impact of clinical decision support tools, there is variability in results, in part because of the diversity of types of decision support tools, users, and contexts as well as limited validation of the tools in use and in part because of the lack of clarity in defining the whole intervention.

摘要

背景

尽管数字健康方法具有帮助缓解持续的员工短缺和提高护理质量的巨大潜力,但数字创新在养老院等长期护理机构中仍未产生实际影响。为了了解长期护理机构(如护理院)中数字创新的现状,了解目前在长期护理机构中使用的哪些临床决策支持工具、它们的用途、开发方式以及使用哪些类型的数据非常重要。

目的

本综述的目的是分析评估长期护理机构中临床决策支持工具的研究,根据工具的用途和预期用户、用于开发工具的证据基础、工具的使用方式和效果以及工具使用的数据类型进行分析,以丰富现有科学证据,为长期护理机构的数字创新(特别是临床决策支持工具)制定路线图。

方法

对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 21 日期间发表的文献进行了综述,使用了 3 个科学期刊数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library 和英国护理索引)中的关键搜索词。只有评估长期护理机构中临床决策支持工具的研究才被纳入综述。

结果

共有 17 篇论文被纳入最终综述。这些论文中描述的临床决策支持工具用于评估药物管理、压疮预防、痴呆症管理、跌倒预防、住院、营养不良预防、尿路感染和 COVID-19 感染。总的来说,纳入的研究表明,决策支持工具可以改善护理服务的提供和健康结果。

结论

尽管这些研究表明临床决策支持工具具有产生积极影响的潜力,但结果存在差异,部分原因是决策支持工具的类型、用户和使用场景各不相同,以及使用中的工具缺乏验证,部分原因是整个干预措施的定义不明确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07d/9490521/73d7bb6af0a7/jmir_v24i9e39681_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验