Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2022 Sep;40(9):639-645. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0019. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
The aim of this study was to assess shear bond strength (SBS) and failure analysis of adhesion of composite resin (CR) to caries-affected dentin (CAD) pretreated with the Er,Cr:YSGG (ECY) laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and etch and rinse (ER) used for cavity disinfection. Methods used in this study included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SBS analysis, failure analysis, and digital microscopy. The methods were adopted to assess bond integrity, CAD interface, smear layer, and hybridization. Thirty human third molars assessed clinically and having scores of 4 and 5 based on International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria were inspected. Infected dentin was removed. Dentin that was hard and stained pink was categorized as CAD. Ten samples were used in each group for pretreatment of CAD. Ten samples of healthy dentin [sound dentin (SD)] were collected separately and taken as controls. Samples were divided into the following groups: group 1: SD+ER; group 2: CAD+ER; group 3: CAD+ECY; and group 4: CAD+PDT after the pretreatment bonding agent was applied and the restorative procedure was performed using CR. CAD conditioned with PDT before bonding to CR demonstrated the lowest SBS values (11.22 ± 0.77 MPa), whereas the highest SBS values were observed in the SD surface treated with ER (18.25 ± 1.22 MPa). In CAD and SD pretreated with ER, majority of failure modes were cohesive failure and admixed failure, whereas in CAD pretreated with PDT and the ECY laser, the adhesive failure mode was pertinent. The use of the ECY laser and PDT on CAD for cavity disinfection does not have potential for application in clinical settings as it decreases bond integrity of CR. Moreover, the ER pretreatment method for CAD and SD remains the gold standard.
本研究旨在评估经 Er,Cr:YSGG(ECY)激光、光动力疗法(PDT)和酸蚀冲洗(ER)预处理的龋损牙本质(CAD)的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和粘结失败分析,这些方法用于腔消毒。本研究中使用的方法包括扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、SBS 分析、失败分析和数字显微镜。这些方法用于评估粘结完整性、CAD 界面、玷污层和杂交。根据国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)标准,临床评估了 30 颗人类第三磨牙,这些牙齿的评分为 4 分和 5 分。去除感染的牙本质。硬而呈粉红色染色的牙本质被归类为 CAD。CAD 预处理时,每组使用 10 个样本。另外收集了 10 个健康牙本质(正常牙本质(SD))样本作为对照。样本分为以下几组:组 1:SD+ER;组 2:CAD+ER;组 3:CAD+ECY;组 4:CAD+PDT。预处理粘结剂应用后,对 CR 进行修复。在与 CR 粘结前用 PDT 处理 CAD 后,SBS 值最低(11.22±0.77 MPa),而用 ER 处理的 SD 表面的 SBS 值最高(18.25±1.22 MPa)。在经 ER 预处理的 CAD 和 SD 中,大多数失效模式为内聚性失效和混合性失效,而在经 PDT 和 ECY 激光预处理的 CAD 中,粘结失效模式是主要的。ECY 激光和 PDT 联合用于 CAD 腔消毒不具备在临床环境中的应用潜力,因为这会降低 CR 的粘结完整性。此外,ER 预处理方法仍是 CAD 和 SD 的金标准。