Suppr超能文献

晚期英语水平有限的非小细胞肺癌患者的生命末期卫生资源利用。

End-of-Life Health Resource Utilization for Limited English-Proficient Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1716-e1724. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00110. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Limited English-proficient (LEP) patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may receive less palliative care services and more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life (EoL) care. Goals of this retrospective cohort study are to compare access to community palliative home care (CPHC), do not resuscitate (DNR) form completion, place of death, and health resource utilization at EoL between English-proficient (EP) and LEP patients with NSCLC in Vancouver, Canada.

METHODS

All patients with advanced NSCLC referred in 2016 and received medical care were included. Patients were classified as LEP if seen with a medical interpreter. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients were referred, 66% EP. Rates of CPHC referral and DNR form completion were the same for both groups (84% and 92%, = 1.00). LEP patients received earlier access to CPHC (15 10 weeks before death, = .039). Rates of ER visits within 6 months and 30 days of death were 0.89 for EP patients and 0.7 for LEP patients, = .374, and 0.1 for EP patients and 0.13 for LEP patients, = .244. Hospitalization rates within 6 months and 30 days of death were 1.4 for EP patients and 1.59 for LEP patients, = .640, and 0.67 for EP patients and 0.81 for LEP patients, = .091. EP patients were more likely to have a home death (26% 14%), whereas LEP patients died in acute care (23% 14%) or a tertiary palliative care unit (24% 19%). This was not statistically significant ( = .335). LEP patients had better median overall survival (8.5 5.4 months, < .001), but when controlled by age, mutation, and EP status, only receipt of palliative-intent systemic therapy was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

EP and LEP patients with NSCLC have similar referral rates to CPHC, DNR form completion, and EoL health resource utilization. The measured EoL variables did not demonstrate significant disparities between EP and LEP patients.

摘要

目的

有限英语水平(LEP)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者可能接受较少的姑息治疗服务,更有可能接受积极的临终关怀(EoL)治疗。本回顾性队列研究的目的是比较加拿大温哥华精通英语(EP)和 LEP 的 NSCLC 患者在获得社区姑息治疗家庭护理(CPHC)、不复苏(DNR)表填写、死亡地点和临终时卫生资源利用方面的差异。

方法

纳入 2016 年所有接受医疗服务的晚期 NSCLC 患者。如果患者在就诊时使用了医疗翻译,则将其归类为 LEP。使用描述性统计、单变量和多变量分析比较两组之间的结局。

结果

共有 186 名患者被转诊,其中 66%为 EP。两组 CPHC 转诊率和 DNR 表填写率相同(84%和 92%, = 1.00)。LEP 患者更早获得 CPHC(15 10 周前死亡, =.039)。EP 患者在死亡前 6 个月和 30 天内急诊就诊率分别为 0.89 和 0.70, =.374,而 LEP 患者分别为 0.10 和 0.13, =.244。EP 患者在死亡前 6 个月和 30 天内的住院率分别为 1.4 和 1.59, =.640,而 LEP 患者分别为 0.67 和 0.81, =.091。EP 患者更有可能在家中死亡(26% 14%),而 LEP 患者在急性护理病房(23% 14%)或三级姑息治疗病房(24% 19%)死亡。这没有统计学意义( =.335)。LEP 患者的中位总生存期(8.5 5.4 个月, <.001)更长,但在控制年龄、突变和 EP 状态后,只有姑息治疗意向的系统治疗具有统计学意义。

结论

EP 和 LEP 的 NSCLC 患者获得 CPHC、DNR 表填写和 EoL 卫生资源利用的转诊率相似。测量的 EoL 变量并未显示 EP 和 LEP 患者之间存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验