Department of Sociology, LSE, London, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2022 Dec;73(5):923-941. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12976. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
The Office for Students is now holding UK universities to account for their failures to address racial inequalities, and the Teaching Excellence Framework is bringing the student experience to the fore in assessing higher education institutions. Racial inequalities persist in spite of decades of legislation aiming to promote equality and end discrimination. The paper considers two main areas of racial equalities work, namely, (1) anti-racist and (2) decolonial initiatives. It suggests that the rise of managerialism and in particular, audit cultures, have allowed racism to flourish in spite, or because of, the need to account for equality, diversity and inclusion in global markets for higher education. Auditing requires a focus on identities, and cannot take into account the complex ways in which race, race thinking and racism are maintained in knowledge production. The lack of consensus around what decolonial education should be undermines attempts to produce educational social justice. From a feminist postcolonial perspective, the paper suggests that recentralizing racism and reengaging difference offer an important way to negotiate more just educational futures.
学生办公室现在要求英国大学对其未能解决种族不平等问题负责,教学卓越框架在评估高等教育机构时将学生体验置于首位。尽管几十年来一直立法旨在促进平等和消除歧视,但种族不平等仍然存在。本文考虑了种族平等工作的两个主要领域,即(1)反种族主义和(2)去殖民化倡议。它表明,尽管需要在全球高等教育市场中平等、多样性和包容性进行核算,但管理主义的兴起,特别是审计文化的兴起,使得种族主义得以蓬勃发展。审计需要关注身份,而不能考虑到种族、种族思维和种族主义在知识生产中得以维持的复杂方式。对于什么是去殖民教育缺乏共识,这破坏了教育社会公正的尝试。从女权主义后殖民主义的角度来看,本文认为,重新集中关注种族主义和重新参与差异为协商更公正的教育未来提供了一个重要途径。