Department of Neurology, Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases (Associated National Centre in the European Reference Network ERN EURO-NMD), University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Eur J Pain. 2022 Nov;26(10):2198-2212. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2034. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assesses the functional integrity of small and large nerve fibre afferents and central somatosensory pathways; QST was assumed to provide insight into the mechanisms of neuropathy. We analysed QST profiles and phenotypes in patients with diabetes mellitus to study whether these could differentiate patients with and without pain and neuropathy.
A standardized QST protocol was performed and 'loss and gain of function' abnormalities were analysed in four groups of subjects: diabetic patients with painful (pDSPN; n = 220) and non-painful distal symmetric polyneuropathy (nDSPN; n = 219), diabetic patients without neuropathy (DM; n = 23) and healthy non-diabetic subjects (n = 37). Based on the QST findings, diabetic subjects were further stratified into four predefined prototypic phenotypes: sensory loss (SL), thermal hyperalgesia (TH), mechanical hyperalgesia (MH) and healthy individuals.
Patients in the pDSPN group showed the greatest hyposensitivity ('loss of function'), and DM patients showed the lowest, with statistically significant increases in thermal, thermal pain, mechanical and mechanical pain sensory thresholds. Accordingly, the frequency of the SL phenotype was significantly higher in the pDSPN subgroup (41.8%), than expected (p < 0.0042). The proportion of 'gain of function' abnormalities was low in both pDSPN and nDSPN patients without significant differences.
There is a continuum in the sensory profiles of diabetic patients, with a more pronounced sensory loss in pDSPN group probably reflecting somatosensory nerve fibre degeneration. An analysis of 'gain of function' abnormalities (allodynia, hyperalgesia) did not offer a key to understanding the pathophysiology of spontaneous diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.
This article, using quantitative sensory testing profiles in large cohorts of diabetic patients with and without polyneuropathy and pain, presents a continuum in the sensory profiles of diabetic patients, with more pronounced 'loss of function' abnormalities in painful polyneuropathy patients. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy probably represents a 'more progressed' type of neuropathy with more pronounced somatosensory nerve fibre degeneration. The proportion of 'gain of function' sensory abnormalities was low, and these offer limited understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of spontaneous neuropathic pain.
定量感觉测试(QST)评估小纤维和大纤维传入神经以及中枢躯体感觉通路的功能完整性;QST 被认为可以深入了解神经病变的机制。我们分析了糖尿病患者的 QST 图谱和表型,以研究这些图谱和表型是否可以区分有疼痛和无疼痛及无神经病变的患者。
对四组受试者进行了标准化的 QST 检测,并分析了“功能丧失和获得”异常:有疼痛性(pDSPN;n=220)和无痛性远端对称性多发性神经病(nDSPN;n=219)的糖尿病患者、无神经病变的糖尿病患者(DM;n=23)和健康非糖尿病受试者(n=37)。基于 QST 结果,进一步将糖尿病患者分为四个预先设定的典型表型:感觉丧失(SL)、热痛觉过敏(TH)、机械性痛觉过敏(MH)和健康个体。
pDSPN 组患者表现出最大的感觉迟钝(“功能丧失”),DM 患者表现出最低的感觉迟钝,热、热痛、机械和机械痛觉感觉阈值显著增加。因此,pDSPN 亚组中 SL 表型的频率明显更高(41.8%),明显高于预期(p<0.0042)。pDSPN 和 nDSPN 患者中“功能获得”异常的比例较低,且无显著差异。
糖尿病患者的感觉特征呈连续分布,pDSPN 组的感觉损失更为明显,可能反映出躯体感觉神经纤维变性。对“功能获得”异常(感觉异常、痛觉过敏)的分析并不能为理解自发性糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的病理生理学提供关键线索。
本文使用有和无多发性神经病及疼痛的糖尿病患者的大样本 QST 图谱分析,提出了糖尿病患者的感觉特征呈连续分布,有疼痛性多发性神经病的患者的“功能丧失”异常更为明显。有疼痛的糖尿病多发性神经病可能代表一种“更严重”的神经病变类型,表现为更明显的躯体感觉神经纤维变性。“功能获得”感觉异常的比例较低,对自发性神经病理性疼痛的病理生理学机制的理解有限。