Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolism and Clinical Chemistry (Internal Medicine 1), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Diabetologia. 2024 Feb;67(2):275-289. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06050-y. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) allows the identification of individuals with rapid progression of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) based on certain sensory phenotypes. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of these phenotypes with the structural integrity of the sciatic nerve among individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Seventy-six individuals with type 2 diabetes took part in this cross-sectional study and underwent QST of the right foot and high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography including diffusion tensor imaging of the right distal sciatic nerve to determine the sciatic nerve fractional anisotropy (FA) and cross-sectional area (CSA), both of which serve as markers of structural integrity of peripheral nerves. Participants were then assigned to four sensory phenotypes (participants with type 2 diabetes and healthy sensory profile [HSP], thermal hyperalgesia [TH], mechanical hyperalgesia [MH], sensory loss [SL]) by a standardised sorting algorithm based on QST.
Objective neurological deficits showed a gradual increase across HSP, TH, MH and SL groups, being higher in MH compared with HSP and in SL compared with HSP and TH. The number of participants categorised as HSP, TH, MH and SL was 16, 24, 17 and 19, respectively. There was a gradual decrease of the sciatic nerve's FA (HSP 0.444, TH 0.437, MH 0.395, SL 0.382; p=0.005) and increase of CSA (HSP 21.7, TH 21.5, MH 25.9, SL 25.8 mm; p=0.011) across the four phenotypes. Further, MH and SL were associated with a lower sciatic FA (MH unstandardised regression coefficient [B]=-0.048 [95% CI -0.091, -0.006], p=0.027; SL B=-0.062 [95% CI -0.103, -0.020], p=0.004) and CSA (MH β=4.3 [95% CI 0.5, 8.0], p=0.028; SL B=4.0 [95% CI 0.4, 7.7], p=0.032) in a multivariable regression analysis. The sciatic FA correlated negatively with the sciatic CSA (r=-0.35, p=0.002) and markers of microvascular damage (high-sensitivity troponin T, urine albumin/creatinine ratio).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The most severe sensory phenotypes of DSPN (MH and SL) showed diminishing sciatic nerve structural integrity indexed by lower FA, likely representing progressive axonal loss, as well as increasing CSA of the sciatic nerve, which cannot be detected in individuals with TH. Individuals with type 2 diabetes may experience a predefined cascade of nerve fibre damage in the course of the disease, from healthy to TH, to MH and finally SL, while structural changes in the proximal nerve seem to precede the sensory loss of peripheral nerves and indicate potential targets for the prevention of end-stage DSPN.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03022721.
目的/假设:定量感觉测试(QST)允许根据某些感觉表型来识别快速进展的糖尿病感觉运动多发性神经病(DSPN)患者。因此,本研究的目的是调查这些表型与 2 型糖尿病个体坐骨神经结构完整性之间的关系。
76 名 2 型糖尿病患者参与了这项横断面研究,并接受了右脚 QST 和包括右侧远端坐骨神经扩散张量成像在内的高分辨率磁共振神经成像,以确定坐骨神经分数各向异性(FA)和横截面积(CSA),这两者均作为周围神经结构完整性的标志物。然后,根据 QST 通过标准化排序算法将参与者分为四种感觉表型(2 型糖尿病和健康感觉特征[HSP]、热痛觉过敏[TH]、机械性痛觉过敏[MH]和感觉丧失[SL])。
客观神经缺陷在 HSP、TH、MH 和 SL 组中逐渐增加,MH 组比 HSP 组和 SL 组比 HSP 组和 TH 组更高。被归类为 HSP、TH、MH 和 SL 的参与者人数分别为 16、24、17 和 19。坐骨神经 FA(HSP 0.444、TH 0.437、MH 0.395、SL 0.382;p=0.005)逐渐降低,CSA(HSP 21.7、TH 21.5、MH 25.9、SL 25.8 mm;p=0.011)逐渐增加。此外,MH 和 SL 与较低的坐骨 FA 相关(MH 未标准化回归系数 [B]=-0.048 [95% CI -0.091, -0.006],p=0.027;SL B=-0.062 [95% CI -0.103, -0.020],p=0.004)和 CSA(MH β=4.3 [95% CI 0.5, 8.0],p=0.028;SL B=4.0 [95% CI 0.4, 7.7],p=0.032)在多变量回归分析中。坐骨 FA 与坐骨 CSA(r=-0.35,p=0.002)和微血管损伤标志物(高敏肌钙蛋白 T、尿白蛋白/肌酐比)呈负相关。
结论/解释:DSPN 最严重的感觉表型(MH 和 SL)表现出坐骨神经结构完整性降低,FA 值降低,可能代表进行性轴突丧失,以及坐骨神经 CSA 增加,这在 TH 患者中无法检测到。2 型糖尿病患者可能在疾病过程中经历神经纤维损伤的预定义级联,从健康到 TH,再到 MH,最后到 SL,而近端神经的结构变化似乎先于周围神经的感觉丧失,并提示潜在的预防终末期 DSPN 的靶点。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03022721。