• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者护理中的避孕决策自主权:一种心理计量学测量工具。

Agency in Contraceptive Decision-Making in Patient Care: a Psychometric Measure.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1366-1374. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07774-0. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07774-0
PMID:36070169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10160288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient agency in contraceptive decision-making is an essential component of reproductive autonomy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a psychometrically robust measure of patient contraceptive agency in the clinic visit, as a measure does not yet exist.

DESIGN

For scale development, we generated and field tested 54 questionnaire items, grounded in qualitative research. We used item response theory-based methods to select and evaluate scale items for psychometric performance. We iteratively examined model fit, dimensionality, internal consistency, internal structure validity, and differential item functioning to arrive at a final scale.

PARTICIPANTS

A racially/ethnically diverse sample of 338 individuals, aged 15-34 years, receiving contraceptive care across nine California clinics in 2019-2020.

MAIN MEASURES

Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS) of patient agency in preventive care.

KEY RESULTS

Participants were 20.5 mean years, with 36% identifying as Latinx, 26% White, 20% Black, 10% Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Scale items covered the domains of freedom from coercion, non-judgmental care, and active decision-making, and loaded on to a single factor, with a Cronbach's α of 0.80. Item responses fit a unidimensional partial credit item response model (weighted mean square statistic within 0.75-1.33 for each item), met criteria for internal structure validity, and showed no meaningful differential item functioning. Most participants expressed high agency in their contraceptive visit (mean score 9.6 out of 14). One-fifth, however, experienced low agency or coercion, with the provider wanting them to use a specific method or to make decisions for them. Agency scores were lowest among Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander participants (adjusted coefficient: -1.5 [-2.9, -0.1] vs. White) and among those whose mothers had less than a high school education (adjusted coefficient; -2.1 [-3.3, -0.8] vs. college degree or more).

CONCLUSIONS

The Contraceptive Agency Scale can be used in research and clinical care to reinforce non-coercive service provision as a standard of care.

摘要

背景

患者在避孕决策中的自主性是生殖自主权的重要组成部分。

目的

我们旨在开发一种在临床就诊中测量患者避孕自主性的心理测量学上可靠的工具,因为目前还没有这样的工具。

设计

为了进行量表开发,我们生成并在实地测试了 54 个问卷项目,这些项目基于定性研究。我们使用基于项目反应理论的方法来选择和评估量表项目的心理测量性能。我们反复检查模型拟合度、维度、内部一致性、内部结构有效性和不同项目功能,以得出最终的量表。

参与者

2019 年至 2020 年期间,在加利福尼亚州的 9 家诊所接受避孕护理的 338 名年龄在 15 至 34 岁之间的不同种族/族裔的个体。

主要测量

预防保健中的患者代理避孕机构量表(CAS)。

主要结果

参与者的平均年龄为 20.5 岁,其中 36%是拉丁裔,26%是白人,20%是黑人,10%是亚洲/夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民。量表项目涵盖了不受胁迫、非评判性护理和积极决策的领域,并归属于一个单一因素,Cronbach's α 为 0.80。项目反应符合单维部分信用项目反应模型(每个项目的加权均方根统计值在 0.75 到 1.33 之间),符合内部结构有效性标准,并且没有明显的不同项目功能。大多数参与者在避孕就诊中表现出高度的自主性(14 分中平均得分为 9.6 分)。然而,五分之一的参与者经历了低度的自主性或胁迫,提供者希望他们使用特定的方法或为他们做出决定。在亚洲/夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民参与者(调整后的系数:-1.5[-2.9,-0.1]与白人)和母亲受教育程度低于高中的参与者(调整后的系数:-2.1[-3.3,-0.8]与大学学位或更高)中,代理评分最低。

结论

避孕代理量表可用于研究和临床护理,以加强非胁迫性服务提供,作为护理标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58d/10160288/a4cba3a85b34/11606_2022_7774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58d/10160288/c84c0d4ff644/11606_2022_7774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58d/10160288/a4cba3a85b34/11606_2022_7774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58d/10160288/c84c0d4ff644/11606_2022_7774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58d/10160288/a4cba3a85b34/11606_2022_7774_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Agency in Contraceptive Decision-Making in Patient Care: a Psychometric Measure.患者护理中的避孕决策自主权:一种心理计量学测量工具。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1366-1374. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07774-0. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Measuring a Critical Component of Contraceptive Decision Making: The Contraceptive Concerns and Beliefs Scale.测量避孕决策的关键因素:避孕顾虑和信念量表。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 May;28(5):847-857. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03856-5. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
"She should support me, she's my doctor:" Patient perceptions of agency in contraceptive decision-making in the clinical encounter in Northern California.“她应该支持我,她是我的医生:”北加州临床就诊中患者对避孕决策自主权的认知。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jun;55(2):94-103. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12226. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: The Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM).验证一种用于评估三个中低收入国家计划生育服务中决策自主权的衡量标准:计划生育自主决策量表(FP-ADM)。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0293586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293586. eCollection 2023.
6
Measuring the Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Psychometric Examination and Development of a Valid and Reliable Prospective Instrument.测量避孕的性可接受性:心理计量学检验和有效可靠前瞻性工具的开发。
J Sex Med. 2022 Mar;19(3):507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Prospective Pregnancy Preferences: The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale.测量预期妊娠偏好的工具的心理计量学评估:避免妊娠愿望量表。
Med Care. 2019 Feb;57(2):152-158. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001048.
8
Development of a brief questionnaire to assess contraceptive intent.开发一份简短问卷以评估避孕意向。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
10
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy.社区成员对于联邦强制推行的医疗补助绝育政策的目标及优先事项
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 27;146(3):394-401. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988.
2
Bridging the knowledge gap: a feminist lens on the post-birth control syndrome and media narratives.弥合知识鸿沟:从女性主义视角看生育控制后综合征与媒体叙事
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jul 9;6:1556810. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1556810. eCollection 2025.
3
Adaptation of the G-NORM (Gender norms scale) in Uganda: An examination of how gender norms are associated with reproductive health decision-making.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Psychometric Examination and Development of a Valid and Reliable Prospective Instrument.测量避孕的性可接受性:心理计量学检验和有效可靠前瞻性工具的开发。
J Sex Med. 2022 Mar;19(3):507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
2
What's so troubling about 'voluntary' family planning anyway? A feminist perspective.“自愿”计划生育到底有什么问题?女权主义视角。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2021 Dec;75(sup1):221-234. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2021.1996623.
3
'I haven't heard much about other methods': quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania.
《在乌干达适应 G-NORM(性别规范量表):研究性别规范如何与生殖健康决策相关联》
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0308249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308249. eCollection 2024.
4
Conceptualizing Contraceptive Agency: A Critical Step to Enable Human Rights-Based Family Planning Programs and Measurement.概念化避孕自主权:实现基于人权的计划生育方案和衡量的关键步骤。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Feb 28;12(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00299.
5
Measuring a Critical Component of Contraceptive Decision Making: The Contraceptive Concerns and Beliefs Scale.测量避孕决策的关键因素:避孕顾虑和信念量表。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 May;28(5):847-857. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03856-5. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
6
Concern that contraception affects future fertility: How common is this concern among young people and does it stop them from using contraception?对避孕会影响未来生育能力的担忧:这种担忧在年轻人中有多普遍,它是否会阻碍他们使用避孕措施?
Contracept X. 2023 Nov 28;5:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100103. eCollection 2023.
7
"She should support me, she's my doctor:" Patient perceptions of agency in contraceptive decision-making in the clinical encounter in Northern California.“她应该支持我,她是我的医生:”北加州临床就诊中患者对避孕决策自主权的认知。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jun;55(2):94-103. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12226. Epub 2023 May 22.
“我没有听说过其他方法”:在坦桑尼亚推广产后宫内节育器的项目中的护理质量和以人为主。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005775.
4
From choice to agency in family planning services.从计划生育服务中的选择到自主决定权
Lancet. 2021 Jul 10;398(10295):99-101. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00990-9. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Sterilization in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE's) Detention: Ethical Failures and Systemic Injustice.美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)拘留中心的绝育行为:道德失范与系统性不公。
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):832-834. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306186.
7
Measuring Men's Gender Norm Beliefs Related to Contraception: Development of the Masculine Norms and Family Planning Acceptance Scale.测量男性与避孕相关的性别规范信念:男性规范和计划生育接受度量表的制定。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Aug;50(6):2691-2702. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01941-w. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Black Women's Perspectives on Structural Racism across the Reproductive Lifespan: A Conceptual Framework for Measurement Development.黑人群体在生殖生命周期中对结构性种族主义的观点:一种衡量工具的开发概念框架。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Mar;25(3):402-413. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03074-3. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
The Fine Line Between Informing and Coercing: Community Health Center Clinicians' Approaches to Counseling Young People About IUDs.告知与强制之间的微妙界限:社区健康中心临床医生为年轻人提供宫内节育器咨询的方法。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec;52(4):245-252. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12161. Epub 2020 Dec 1.