Kondiboyina Avinash, Smolich Joseph J, Cheung Michael M H, Mynard Jonathan P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2023 Mar;70(3):899-908. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3204773. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
A diastolic-to-systolic shift in the return time (RT) of backward waves to central arteries is expected with ageing. However, current methods of estimating RT-inflection point, zero crossing, and foot-depend on a single waveform feature and produce systolic RT throughout life. We propose a novel centroid method that accounts for the entire backward pressure waveform. We assess the accuracy of the various methods against a ground truth RT (GTRT) and their sensitivity to diastolic/systolic RT.
Linear wave tracking was implemented in a one-dimensional systemic arterial tree model and GTRT was calculated as the amplitude-weighted mean RT of backward waves at the ascending aorta. The sensitivity of the methods to diastolic/systolic RT was also assessed in ten sheep. A balloon catheter in the descending thoracic aorta generated a backward-running pulse that arrived at the ascending aorta at different times during diastole or systole, allowing the 'bulk' RT of the backward-running wave ensemble to be manipulated.
Using a virtual cohort of 1200 patients, the centroid RT was closest to GTRT compared to the zero crossing, inflection point, and foot methods; mean differences (limits of agreement) were -8 (-47, 30), vs -42 (-136, 52), -78 (-305, 149), and -197 (-379,-15) ms, respectively. Furthermore, only the centroid method was sensitive to both diastolic and systolic RT; other methods were only sensitive to systolic RT.
The centroid method had the highest accuracy and robustness in estimating RT.
This can provide insight into the diastolic-to-systolic shift in RT of backward waves with ageing.
随着年龄增长,预计向后波返回中心动脉的返回时间(RT)会出现舒张期到收缩期的转变。然而,当前估计RT拐点、过零点和波谷的方法依赖于单一波形特征,并且在整个生命过程中产生收缩期RT。我们提出了一种考虑整个向后压力波形的新型质心方法。我们根据地面真值RT(GTRT)评估各种方法的准确性及其对舒张期/收缩期RT的敏感性。
在一维全身动脉树模型中实施线性波跟踪,并将GTRT计算为升主动脉处向后波的振幅加权平均RT。还在十只绵羊中评估了这些方法对舒张期/收缩期RT的敏感性。胸降主动脉中的球囊导管产生一个向后传播的脉冲,该脉冲在舒张期或收缩期的不同时间到达升主动脉,从而可以操纵向后传播波群的“总体”RT。
使用1200名患者的虚拟队列,与过零点、拐点和波谷方法相比,质心RT最接近GTRT;平均差异(一致性界限)分别为-8(-47,30),对比-42(-136,52)、-78(-305,149)和-197(-379,-15)毫秒。此外,只有质心方法对舒张期和收缩期RT均敏感;其他方法仅对收缩期RT敏感。
质心方法在估计RT方面具有最高的准确性和稳健性。
这可以深入了解随着年龄增长向后波RT的舒张期到收缩期转变。