Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9299-9306. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07352-4. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Adequate integration of palliative care in oncological care can improve the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Whether such integration affects the use of diagnostic procedures and medical interventions has not been studied extensively. We investigated the effect of the implementation of a standardized palliative care pathway in a hospital on the use of diagnostic procedures, anticancer treatment, and other medical interventions in patients with incurable cancer at the end of their life.
In a pre- and post-intervention study, data were collected concerning adult patients with cancer who died between February 2014 and February 2015 (pre-PCP period) or between November 2015 and November 2016 (post-PCP period). We collected information on diagnostic procedures, anticancer treatments, and other medical interventions during the last 3 months of life.
We included 424 patients in the pre-PCP period and 426 in the post-PCP period. No differences in percentage of laboratory tests (85% vs 85%, p = 0.795) and radiological procedures (85% vs 82%, p = 0.246) were found between both groups. The percentage of patients who received anticancer treatment or other medical interventions was lower in the post-PCP period (40% vs 22%, p < 0.001; and 42% vs 29%, p < 0.001, respectively).
Implementation of a PCP resulted in fewer medical interventions, including anticancer treatments, in the last 3 months of life. Implementation of the PCP may have created awareness among physicians of patients' impending death, thereby supporting caregivers and patients to make appropriate decisions about medical treatment at the end of life.
Netherlands Trial Register; clinical trial number: NL 4400 (NTR4597); date registrated: 2014-04-27.
充分将姑息治疗纳入肿瘤学治疗中,可以提高晚期癌症患者的生活质量。姑息治疗的实施是否会影响诊断程序和医疗干预的使用尚未得到广泛研究。我们研究了在一家医院实施标准化姑息治疗途径对终末期癌症患者的诊断程序、抗癌治疗和其他医疗干预的使用的影响。
在一项干预前后研究中,我们收集了 2014 年 2 月至 2015 年 2 月(PCP 前)或 2015 年 11 月至 2016 年 11 月(PCP 后)期间死亡的成年癌症患者的数据。我们收集了他们生命最后 3 个月的诊断程序、抗癌治疗和其他医疗干预信息。
我们纳入了 PCP 前组的 424 例患者和 PCP 后组的 426 例患者。两组之间实验室检查(85%对 85%,p=0.795)和影像学检查(85%对 82%,p=0.246)的百分比没有差异。PCP 后组接受抗癌治疗或其他医疗干预的患者比例较低(40%对 22%,p<0.001;42%对 29%,p<0.001)。
实施姑息治疗方案后,在生命的最后 3 个月中,接受的医疗干预,包括抗癌治疗,减少了。姑息治疗方案的实施可能使医生对患者即将死亡的意识增强,从而支持医护人员和患者在生命末期做出适当的治疗决策。
荷兰试验注册处;临床试验编号:NL 4400(NTR4597);注册日期:2014 年 4 月 27 日。