Suppr超能文献

妊娠偏好和避孕措施使用范围:美国东南部一项基于人群的调查结果。

Ranges of pregnancy preferences and contraceptive use: Results from a population-based survey in the southeast United States.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, Oakland, California, USA.

College of Public Health, Department of Health Services Management and Policy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Sep;54(3):90-98. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12205. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Understanding how pregnancy preferences shape contraceptive use is essential for guiding contraceptive interventions and policies that center individuals' preferences and desires. Lack of rigorous measurement of pregnancy preferences, particularly on the population level, has been a methodologic challenge.

METHODS

We investigated associations between prospective pregnancy preferences, measured with a valid instrument, the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale, and contraceptive use in a representative sample of 2601 pregnancy-capable self-identified women, aged 18-44 years, in Alabama and South Carolina (2017-2018). We used multivariable regression with weighting to investigate how probability of modern contraceptive use, and use of different contraceptive method types, changed with increasing preference to avoid pregnancy.

RESULTS

Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale scores (range:0-4, 4 = greater preference to avoid pregnancy, median = 2.29, IQR: 1.57-3.14; α:0.95) were strongly associated with contraceptive use among sexually active respondents (aPR = 1.15 [1.10, 1.20]; predicted 45% using contraception among DAP = 0, 62% among DAP = 2, 86% among DAP = 4). Method types used did not differ by DAP score. The most common reasons for nonuse were concern over side effects and not wanting to use a method (32% each) among respondents with mid-range and high DAP scores. Among those with mid-range DAP scores, 20% reported nonuse due to not minding if pregnancy were to occur (vs. 0% among those with high DAP scores).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy preferences strongly influence likelihood of contraceptive use. Providion of appropriate contraceptive care to those not explicitly desiring pregnancy must differentiate between ranges of feelings about pregnancy, perceived drawbacks to contraceptive use, and legitimate psychological and interpersonal benefits of nonuse to promote autonomy in contraceptive decision-making.

摘要

背景

了解妊娠偏好如何影响避孕措施的使用对于指导以个体偏好和意愿为中心的避孕干预和政策至关重要。缺乏对妊娠偏好的严格测量,特别是在人群水平上,这一直是一个方法学挑战。

方法

我们在阿拉巴马州和南卡罗来纳州的一个有代表性的 2601 名有生育能力的自认为是女性的样本中(年龄在 18-44 岁之间),调查了前瞻性妊娠偏好与避孕措施使用之间的关系,使用了经过验证的工具——避孕愿望量表(DAP 量表)来测量妊娠偏好。我们使用多变量回归和加权来研究随着避免妊娠偏好的增加,现代避孕措施使用的概率以及不同避孕方法类型的使用如何变化。

结果

DAP 量表评分(范围:0-4,4 表示更强烈地避免妊娠,中位数=2.29,IQR:1.57-3.14;α:0.95)与有性行为的应答者的避孕措施使用密切相关(aPR=1.15 [1.10,1.20];DAP=0 时预测 45%使用避孕措施,DAP=2 时预测 62%,DAP=4 时预测 86%)。不同 DAP 评分的方法类型使用没有差异。在 DAP 评分处于中高水平的应答者中,最常见的不使用原因是担心副作用和不想使用某种方法(各占 32%)。在 DAP 评分处于中高水平的应答者中,有 20%的人报告不使用是因为不介意怀孕(而 DAP 评分较高的应答者中这一比例为 0%)。

结论

妊娠偏好强烈影响避孕措施的使用可能性。对于那些并非明确希望怀孕的人,提供适当的避孕护理必须区分对怀孕的不同感受范围、对避孕措施使用的潜在弊端,以及非使用的合法心理和人际效益,以促进避孕决策的自主权。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验