Kochs Sarah, Pimpini Leonardo, van Zoest Wieske, Jansen Anita, Roefs Anne
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Cogn. 2022 Aug 11;5(1):43. doi: 10.5334/joc.236. eCollection 2022.
Evidence for attention bias (AB) for food in restrained eaters is inconsistent. A person's mindset related to food - that is, whether someone focuses on the hedonic or health aspects of food - might be an overlooked influence on AB for food, possibly explaining the inconsistency in the literature. Fluctuations between a hedonic versus a health mindset might be strongest in restrained eaters, who have a conflicted relationship with food. We investigated the effect of mindset and dietary restraint on AB for food and food intake. We hypothesized that AB for food, as reflected in eye-movement measures and manual response latencies, as well as food intake, would be larger in the hedonic than in the health mindset, most strongly in participants scoring high on dietary restraint. Moreover, we expected a positive correlation between AB for food and food intake, especially in the hedonic mindset. We used short video clips to induce either a health or hedonic mindset. Subsequently, participants ( = 122) performed a modified additional singleton task with pictures of high-caloric food vs neutral pictures as irrelevant distractors. Next, food intake was measured in a bogus taste test. We found no evidence for an AB towards food, nor any moderation by either mindset or dietary restraint. Food intake tended to be higher for participants scoring higher on dietary restraint, but effects were not moderated by mindset. Response-latency based AB for food tended to correlate positively with food intake in the hedonic mindset. Taken together, our hypotheses regarding AB for food were largely not confirmed. We provide suggestions on how to improve upon the specific implementations of our AB task and mindset manipulation, to strengthen future research in this field.
节食者对食物存在注意偏向(AB)的证据并不一致。一个人对食物的思维模式——也就是说,一个人是关注食物的享乐方面还是健康方面——可能是对食物AB的一个被忽视的影响因素,这可能解释了文献中的不一致性。在与食物关系矛盾的节食者中,享乐型与健康型思维模式之间的波动可能最为强烈。我们研究了思维模式和饮食限制对食物AB及食物摄入量的影响。我们假设,从眼动测量和手动反应潜伏期反映出的对食物的AB以及食物摄入量,在享乐型思维模式中会比在健康型思维模式中更大,在饮食限制得分高的参与者中最为明显。此外,我们预计对食物的AB与食物摄入量之间存在正相关,尤其是在享乐型思维模式中。我们使用短视频片段来诱导健康或享乐型思维模式。随后,参与者(n = 122)进行了一项经过修改的额外单例任务,以高热量食物图片与中性图片作为无关干扰物。接下来,在一个虚假味觉测试中测量食物摄入量。我们没有发现对食物存在AB的证据,也没有发现思维模式或饮食限制的调节作用。饮食限制得分较高的参与者的食物摄入量往往更高,但思维模式并没有起到调节作用。在享乐型思维模式中,基于反应潜伏期的对食物的AB往往与食物摄入量呈正相关。综上所述,我们关于对食物的AB的假设在很大程度上没有得到证实。我们就如何改进我们的AB任务和思维模式操纵的具体实施提出了建议,以加强该领域未来的研究。