Polytechnical University of Madrid.
CEO at the architectural firm EQAR Urbanism Building and Accessibility, SL.P.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Sep 2;297:288-295. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220851.
This article seeks to analyze different city plans in terms of proximity and accessibility. A total of 6 highly-recognized pedestrian models were chosen to compare their inclusive micro-mobility measures, not only in international contexts (Paris, Melbourne or Portland); but also a closer look will be taken at Spain, as it has managed to present its own referents (Valladolid, Vitoria and Pontevedra). A qualitative approach study was undergone to assess the real extent of inclusive proximity criteria, triggering a more in-depth, critical analysis by recognizing implicit, non-explicit, inclusive micro-mobility measures. The findings show disconnections between accessibility and proximity policies, mainly regarding exclusion of explicit accessibility measures and pedestrian mobility comfortability.
本文旨在分析不同城市规划在可达性和临近性方面的差异。选择了 6 个广受认可的行人模型进行比较，不仅在国际范围内（巴黎、墨尔本或波特兰）进行比较，还对西班牙进行了更深入的研究，因为西班牙成功地提出了自己的参考标准（巴利亚多利德、维多利亚和蓬特韦德拉）。采用定性研究方法评估包容性临近性标准的实际程度，通过识别隐含的、非显性的包容性微移动措施，触发更深入、更具批判性的分析。研究结果表明，可达性和临近性政策之间存在脱节，主要是因为缺乏明确的可达性措施和行人移动舒适度。
